StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Cypress vs Testim

Cypress vs Testim

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Testim
Testim
Stacks34
Followers57
Votes0
Cypress
Cypress
Stacks3.5K
Followers2.0K
Votes115
GitHub Stars49.4K
Forks3.4K

Cypress vs Testim: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Cypress and Testim, two popular testing frameworks used for web application testing.

  1. Programming Language Support: Cypress is solely based on JavaScript and supports only JavaScript for writing tests. On the other hand, Testim supports multiple programming languages including JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, and more. This flexibility in language support allows Testim to be integrated easily into existing projects written in different languages.

  2. Testing Approach: Cypress follows the traditional approach of testing, where it runs directly in the browser and executes tests in the same run loop as the application being tested. In contrast, Testim follows a cloud-based approach, where tests are executed remotely using real browsers. This enables Testim to leverage the advantages of cloud infrastructure and provide parallel test execution, scalability, and better performance.

  3. Test Building: Cypress provides a built-in test runner and a browser for testing, allowing developers to view and interact with the application in real-time while writing tests. It provides a rich set of APIs to interact with the application under test, making it easy to set up and write tests. Testim, on the other hand, provides a visual test builder along with code-based editing options. It uses AI-powered algorithms to automatically create and maintain tests, reducing the effort required for test creation.

  4. Test Stability: Cypress has a unique architecture that allows it to directly control and modify the application under test. This enables Cypress to handle asynchronous operations, network requests, and other complexities effectively, resulting in stable tests. Testim, on the other hand, leverages AI to analyze the behavior of the application and automatically adapt the test to changes in the UI, making it robust and stable even when the application changes.

  5. Reporting and Collaboration: Cypress provides detailed and interactive test reports that show the test status, command-by-command screenshots, and logs for easy debugging. It also has built-in support for video recording of test runs. Testim offers comprehensive test reports with screenshots and logs, and it integrates well with popular collaboration tools like Jira, Slack, and GitHub, allowing teams to collaborate and track issues efficiently.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Cypress is an open-source testing framework with a free plan for unlimited users and unlimited tests. It also offers a paid enterprise plan with additional features and support. Testim, on the other hand, provides both a free plan with limited features and a paid plan based on the number of test runs per month. The pricing model for Testim is based on usage, which may be more suitable for teams with varying testing requirements.

In summary, Cypress and Testim differ in terms of programming language support, testing approach, test building techniques, test stability, reporting and collaboration capabilities, and pricing/licensing models. Each framework has its own strengths and weaknesses, so choosing the right one depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the testing team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Testim, Cypress

Dane
Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceonCypressCypressJestJest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k
Comments
Yildiz
Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSTypeScriptTypeScriptCypressCypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Testim
Testim
Cypress
Cypress

It uses artificial intelligence to speed-up the authoring, execution, and maintenance of automated tests.

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Super fast authoring; Machine learning based self-maintenance; Efficiency at scale; Fast, scalable test runs
Time Travel; Debuggability; Automatic Waiting; Spies, Stubs, and Clocks; Network Traffic Control; Consistent Results; Screenshots and Videos
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
49.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
34
Stacks
3.5K
Followers
57
Followers
2.0K
Votes
0
Votes
115
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 29
    Open source
  • 22
    Great documentation
  • 20
    Simple usage
  • 18
    Fast
  • 10
    Cross Browser testing
Cons
  • 21
    Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing
  • 14
    Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support
  • 12
    No iFrame support
  • 9
    No multiple domain support
  • 9
    No page object support
Integrations
Travis CI
Travis CI
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Jira
Jira
TeamCity
TeamCity
Slack
Slack
Codeship
Codeship
Trello
Trello
Jenkins
Jenkins
StrongLoop
StrongLoop
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Testim, Cypress?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana