Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Dapr vs Kong: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Dapr and Kong
Dapr and Kong are two different technologies used in building and managing modern applications. Here are the key differences between Dapr and Kong:
Architecture: Dapr is designed as a runtime for microservices, providing a set of building blocks for distributed applications. It enables developers to build microservices using any language or framework and offers features like service-to-service communication and state management. On the other hand, Kong is an API gateway and service mesh built for managing API traffic and implementing security, observability, and traffic control in a centralized manner.
Focus: Dapr focuses on simplifying the development of microservices-based applications. It provides a framework for building stateless and stateful services, with features like message routing, pub/sub, and distributed tracing. Kong, on the other hand, is primarily focused on managing and securing API traffic. It acts as a gateway between clients and services, providing features like authentication, rate limiting, and request/response transformations.
Integration: Dapr is designed to be integrated into existing applications and can work alongside other service frameworks. It provides various SDKs and libraries for different programming languages, allowing developers to easily adopt Dapr in their projects. Kong, on the other hand, is typically deployed as a separate component or service in the infrastructure stack and acts as a centralized control plane for managing API traffic.
Service Mesh Capabilities: Dapr provides limited service mesh capabilities, primarily focused on load balancing and service discovery. It can be used as a sidecar alongside application containers to provide these functionalities. Kong, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive service mesh solution called Kong Mesh, which includes advanced features like traffic routing, observability, and security policies for microservices.
Community and Ecosystem: Dapr is backed by Microsoft and has an active open-source community contributing to its development and ecosystem. It leverages popular technologies like Docker, Kubernetes, and Redis. Kong, on the other hand, is developed and maintained by Kong Inc. and also has a strong community support. It integrates with a wide range of technologies and platforms, including Kubernetes, Docker, AWS, and more.
Use Cases: Dapr is suitable for building microservices-based applications and can be used in various scenarios like event-driven architectures, IoT, and batch processing. It provides a platform-agnostic approach and can be used in hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Kong is best suited for managing API traffic and providing security and control to APIs. It is commonly used in scenarios where API management and governance are required, such as in API-driven architectures and microservices-based applications.
In summary, Dapr is a runtime framework for building microservices with a focus on developer simplicity, while Kong is an API gateway and service mesh solution focused on managing API traffic and providing centralized control over APIs.
Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.
Pros of Dapr
- Manage inter-service state3
- MTLS "for free"2
- App dashboard for rapid log overview2
- Zipkin app tracing "for free"2
Pros of Kong
- Easy to maintain37
- Easy to install32
- Flexible26
- Great performance21
- Api blueprint7
- Custom Plugins4
- Kubernetes-native3
- Security2
- Has a good plugin infrastructure2
- Agnostic2
- Load balancing1
- Documentation is clear1
- Very customizable1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Dapr
- Additional overhead1