StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. DeepSource Analyzer vs ESLint

DeepSource Analyzer vs ESLint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ESLint
ESLint
Stacks38.6K
Followers14.0K
Votes28
GitHub Stars26.6K
Forks4.8K
DeepSource
DeepSource
Stacks16
Followers49
Votes8

DeepSource Analyzer vs ESLint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing DeepSource Analyzer and ESLint, it is essential to understand the key differences between the two code analysis tools.

  1. Scope of Analysis: DeepSource Analyzer covers a wide range of languages, including Python, JavaScript, Go, Ruby, and more, while ESLint is primarily focused on JavaScript and its variants such as TypeScript.

  2. Built-in Rules: DeepSource Analyzer comes with a set of built-in rules for code quality and security, tailored to each supported language, whereas ESLint requires configuring which rules to apply from its extensive library based on the project's specific needs.

  3. Integration Abilities: DeepSource Analyzer seamlessly integrates with popular version control systems like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, providing continuous analysis on each code change, whereas ESLint needs to be set up as part of the project's build process and may not offer real-time feedback.

  4. Auto-fix Capabilities: ESLint has robust auto-fix capabilities, which can automatically correct certain code quality issues without manual intervention, while DeepSource Analyzer may require manual fixes for identified issues.

  5. Community Support: ESLint has a large and active community that regularly contributes new rules, plugins, and enhancements to the tool, making it a go-to choice for JavaScript developers, whereas DeepSource Analyzer is relatively newer and may have a smaller community base.

  6. Focus on Specific Languages: ESLint caters specifically to the JavaScript ecosystem, offering a comprehensive suite of tools and frameworks for analyzing and improving code quality, whereas DeepSource Analyzer aims to provide cross-language support with a focus on code quality and security for various programming languages.

In Summary, DeepSource Analyzer offers broader language support and integration capabilities, while ESLint specializes in in-depth analysis and auto-fix capabilities for JavaScript projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ESLint, DeepSource

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ESLint
ESLint
DeepSource
DeepSource

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

DeepSource helps developers ship clean and secure code with powerful static analysis, OWASP Top 10 reporting, and Autofix. Trusted by thousands of startups, enterprises, and Fortune 500 companies.

-
Simple configuration; Continuous analysis; Fewer false-positives; Integration with existing tools; Know each issue in detail; Broad-spectrum of issue coverage.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
26.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
38.6K
Stacks
16
Followers
14.0K
Followers
49
Votes
28
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Consistent javascript - opinions don't matter anymore
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    IDE Integration
  • 4
    Customizable
  • 2
    Broad ecosystem of support & users
Pros
  • 3
    Free for open source
  • 3
    Easy setup and analysis
  • 2
    Autofixes for many lints for free
Cons
  • 1
    Test coverage % differs from actual
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
C#
C#
Terraform
Terraform
Docker
Docker
Scala
Scala
GitHub
GitHub
JavaScript
JavaScript
GitLab
GitLab
Bitbucket
Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to ESLint, DeepSource?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana