StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Dependency Monitoring
  5. DeepSource Analyzer vs Snyk

DeepSource Analyzer vs Snyk

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Snyk
Snyk
Stacks580
Followers380
Votes20
DeepSource
DeepSource
Stacks16
Followers49
Votes8

DeepSource Analyzer vs Snyk: What are the differences?

DeepSource Analyzer vs Snyk

DeepSource Analyzer and Snyk are both powerful tools used for analyzing code and detecting vulnerabilities in software projects. However, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Integration Process: DeepSource Analyzer seamlessly integrates with various version control systems, such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, making it easier for developers to incorporate it into their existing workflow. On the other hand, Snyk requires additional setup and configuration to integrate with these platforms.

  2. Supported Languages: DeepSource Analyzer supports a wide range of programming languages, including Python, JavaScript, Go, and Ruby, among others. In contrast, while Snyk also supports popular languages like JavaScript, Python, and Ruby, it has limited support for other languages like Go.

  3. Extensibility: DeepSource Analyzer allows users to write custom analyzers and linters using a simple plugin architecture, enabling them to tailor the tool to their specific requirements. In contrast, Snyk does not provide such extensibility options, limiting users to the built-in capabilities of the tool.

  4. Continuous Integration: DeepSource Analyzer provides built-in support for continuous integration systems like Travis CI, CircleCI, and Jenkins, enabling seamless integration into the CI/CD pipeline. Snyk, on the other hand, requires additional configuration to integrate with these systems, which may be cumbersome for some users.

  5. Code Review: DeepSource Analyzer offers powerful code review features that help developers identify and fix issues early in the development process. It provides detailed reports, suggestions, and automated fixes, enabling quicker resolution of code quality and security issues. Snyk, while offering code scanning capabilities, does not provide the same level of code review and automated fixes.

  6. Pricing and Plans: DeepSource Analyzer offers a free plan for open-source projects, making it accessible to developers who work on such projects. Snyk, on the other hand, offers a free plan for individual developers, but charges for additional features and team collaboration.

In summary, DeepSource Analyzer and Snyk differ in terms of integration process, language support, extensibility, continuous integration, code review capabilities, and pricing plans. These differences make them suitable for different use cases and development environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Snyk, DeepSource

Bryan
Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceonWhiteSourceWhiteSourceSnykSnykSonatype NexusSonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Snyk
Snyk
DeepSource
DeepSource

Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform

DeepSource helps developers ship clean and secure code with powerful static analysis, OWASP Top 10 reporting, and Autofix. Trusted by thousands of startups, enterprises, and Fortune 500 companies.

-
Simple configuration; Continuous analysis; Fewer false-positives; Integration with existing tools; Know each issue in detail; Broad-spectrum of issue coverage.
Statistics
Stacks
580
Stacks
16
Followers
380
Followers
49
Votes
20
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Github Integration
  • 5
    Free for open source projects
  • 4
    Finds lots of real vulnerabilities
  • 1
    Easy to deployed
Cons
  • 2
    Does not integrated with SonarQube
  • 1
    No malware detection
  • 1
    False positives
  • 1
    Complex UI
  • 1
    No surface monitoring
Pros
  • 3
    Free for open source
  • 3
    Easy setup and analysis
  • 2
    Autofixes for many lints for free
Cons
  • 1
    Test coverage % differs from actual
Integrations
Scala
Scala
.NET
.NET
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Docker
Docker
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
Java
Java
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
C#
C#
Terraform
Terraform
Docker
Docker
Scala
Scala
GitHub
GitHub
JavaScript
JavaScript
GitLab
GitLab
Bitbucket
Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to Snyk, DeepSource?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana