StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Deployd vs KrakenD

Deployd vs KrakenD

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Deployd
Deployd
Stacks26
Followers56
Votes4
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks659
KrakenD
KrakenD
Stacks59
Followers158
Votes9

Deployd vs KrakenD: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Deployd and KrakenD are both backend server solutions that are used to build APIs and web services. However, these two solutions have some key differences which set them apart. In this document, we will discuss and explain these differences in detail.

  1. Architecture: Deployd is a development platform that allows you to create custom APIs by defining data models and RESTful routes. It provides a self-hosted solution where the deployment is done on your own servers. On the other hand, KrakenD is an API gateway that acts as a middle layer between clients and multiple backend services. It provides aggregation, composition, and transformation of data from these backend services. It is designed to be a lightweight and highly performant solution.

  2. Scalability: Deployd is suitable for small to medium-sized projects where scalability is not a significant concern. It is not designed to handle high traffic or large-scale applications. In contrast, KrakenD is designed for high scalability and can handle heavy traffic loads. It utilizes a distributed architecture and can horizontally scale by adding more instances of the KrakenD service.

  3. Ease of use: Deployd provides a simple and intuitive interface for creating and managing APIs. It has a visual data modeling tool and a web-based admin dashboard for managing data. It is beginner-friendly and requires minimal coding knowledge. On the other hand, KrakenD is more developer-centric and requires coding skills to configure and customize the API gateway. It provides a flexible configuration file where you can define the backend services, routes, and transformations.

  4. Security features: Deployd does not have built-in security features and it is the responsibility of the developer to implement authentication and authorization mechanisms. It does not provide features like rate limiting, access control, or JWT validation out of the box. In contrast, KrakenD provides various security features such as rate limiting, access control, IP whitelisting, and JWT validation. It also supports integration with OAuth providers for authentication.

  5. Backend compatibility: Deployd supports various databases like MongoDB, MySQL, PostgreSQL, etc., and you can easily connect to these databases to store and retrieve data. It provides a GUI-based approach to define data models and their relationships. On the other hand, KrakenD is backend-agnostic and can work with any existing backend services, regardless of the technology stack or database used. It acts as a layer of abstraction between the clients and the backend services.

  6. Extensibility: Deployd is primarily focused on providing a complete backend solution with limited extensibility options. It does not have a plugin system or support for custom middleware. On the other hand, KrakenD provides an extensible architecture with support for plugins and custom middleware. You can easily customize the behavior of the API gateway by writing your own plugins or middleware.

In summary, Deployd and KrakenD differ in their architecture, scalability, ease of use, security features, backend compatibility, and extensibility. Deployd is a self-hosted development platform for creating custom APIs, while KrakenD is an API gateway designed for scalability and integration with existing backend services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Deployd
Deployd
KrakenD
KrakenD

Deployd is the simplest way to build realtime APIs for web and mobile apps. Ready-made, configurable Resources add common functionality to a Deployd backend, which can be further customized with JavaScript Events.

Its core functionality is to create an API that acts as an aggregator of many microservices into single endpoints, doing the heavy-lifting automatically for you: aggregate, transform, filter, decode, throttle, auth and more.

No boilerplate; Dashboard;1-step deploy
Throttling and usage quotas; Extensible architecture; Circuit breaker; High-load and burst; Service discovery
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
659
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
26
Stacks
59
Followers
56
Followers
158
Votes
4
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Very simple to use. Love the real time features
  • 2
    Its simple to use to make a demo for customer and show
Pros
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 2
    Stateless
  • 2
    Best performant
  • 1
    Easiest to install
  • 1
    Easy to install
Integrations
No integrations available
Keycloak
Keycloak
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
ELK
ELK
Logstash
Logstash
Grafana
Grafana
Kibana
Kibana
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub

What are some alternatives to Deployd, KrakenD?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope