Django CMS vs Grav

Overview

Grav

Stacks114

Followers158

Votes16

GitHub Stars15.2K

Forks1.4K

Django CMS

Stacks74

Followers199

Votes12

Django CMS vs Grav: What are the differences?

Rendering: In Grav, pages are rendered dynamically based on markdown files, providing flexibility and speed, while Django CMS uses templates and models to generate content, allowing for more complex dynamic content rendering with a Python backend.
Database: Grav stores content in flat files, which makes it easier to manage and version control, while Django CMS relies on a relational database, enabling more intricate data relationships and storage structures for complex websites.
Authentication: Django CMS comes with built-in user authentication systems for managing user roles and permissions, while Grav relies on plugins or extensions to achieve the same functionality, requiring additional setup for user access control.
Customization: Grav allows for easy theme and plugin customization through its simple file-based structure, ideal for quick modifications and additions, while Django CMS offers a powerful plugin ecosystem and extensive documentation for creating custom features and functionalities for more advanced web projects.
Community Support: Django CMS has a robust community of developers and contributors, providing regular updates, maintenance, and support, while Grav has a smaller but dedicated community that offers helpful resources and forums for assistance and collaboration.
Learning Curve: Django CMS may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its reliance on Python programming and complex configurations, whereas Grav's flat-file architecture and user-friendly UI make it more accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.

In Summary, Django CMS and Grav differ in rendering methods, database storage, authentication systems, customization options, community support, and learning curves.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Grav	Django CMS
It is a free, open-source and self-hosted content management system (CMS) based on the PHP programming language and Symfony web application framework. It uses a flat file database for both backend and frontend. It is more widely used, and growing at a faster rate, than other leading flat-file CMS competitors.	It is user friendly and has a very intuitive drag and drop interface. It's built around the needs of multi-lingual publishing by default. Its lightweight core makes it easy to integrate with other software and put to use immediately, while its ease of use makes it the go-to choice for content managers, content editors and website admins.
Twig; YAML; Markdown; Flat-file; CLI	LDAP authentification; Session management ; Scripting API
Statistics
GitHub Stars 15.2K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.4K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 114	Stacks 74
Followers 158	Followers 199
Votes 16	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Easy to Update 3 No Databases 2 Strong Security 2 Full Control over customisation + functionality 2 Extensive Plugins Cons 2 Not easily to intergrate as an eCommerce (yet)	Pros 2 Rich features 2 Secure 2 Better UX 2 Easy Integration 2 Drag and drop interface
Integrations
NGINX Symfony PHP	Bootstrap React Angular

What are some alternatives to Grav, Django CMS?

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

Django CMS vs Grav: What are the differences?

Rendering: In Grav, pages are rendered dynamically based on markdown files, providing flexibility and speed, while Django CMS uses templates and models to generate content, allowing for more complex dynamic content rendering with a Python backend.
Database: Grav stores content in flat files, which makes it easier to manage and version control, while Django CMS relies on a relational database, enabling more intricate data relationships and storage structures for complex websites.
Authentication: Django CMS comes with built-in user authentication systems for managing user roles and permissions, while Grav relies on plugins or extensions to achieve the same functionality, requiring additional setup for user access control.
Customization: Grav allows for easy theme and plugin customization through its simple file-based structure, ideal for quick modifications and additions, while Django CMS offers a powerful plugin ecosystem and extensive documentation for creating custom features and functionalities for more advanced web projects.
Community Support: Django CMS has a robust community of developers and contributors, providing regular updates, maintenance, and support, while Grav has a smaller but dedicated community that offers helpful resources and forums for assistance and collaboration.
Learning Curve: Django CMS may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its reliance on Python programming and complex configurations, whereas Grav's flat-file architecture and user-friendly UI make it more accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.

In Summary, Django CMS and Grav differ in rendering methods, database storage, authentication systems, customization options, community support, and learning curves.

Django CMS vs Grav

Overview