StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Localhost Tools
  5. Docker Compose vs ngrok

Docker Compose vs ngrok

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ngrok
ngrok
Stacks419
Followers457
Votes57
GitHub Stars24.4K
Forks4.3K
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K

Docker Compose vs ngrok: What are the differences?

Introduction: Here we will discuss the key differences between Docker Compose and ngrok.

1. Docker Compose: Docker Compose is a tool used for defining and running multi-container Docker applications. It allows users to define the application services and their configurations in a YAML file, making it easy to manage and scale the application.

2. ngrok: ngrok is a tunneling software that creates a secure tunnel to localhost, allowing developers to expose their local server to the internet. It provides a public URL that can be used for testing webhook integrations, demoing projects, and accessing local services remotely.

3. Portability: Docker Compose is more focused on packaging and running applications in a consistent environment, making it easier to replicate the same setup across different environments. On the other hand, ngrok is specifically designed for temporary, external access to local services, making it less suitable for long-term deployments.

4. Configuration: Docker Compose requires defining services, networks, and volumes in a YAML file, which can be version controlled and shared among team members. In contrast, ngrok configuration is done through the command line or web interface, with a focus on simplicity and quick setup for temporary use cases.

5. Collaboration: Docker Compose encourages collaboration by allowing teams to define and share application configurations in a standardized format. Ngrok, while useful for quick demos and testing, may not be as suitable for collaborative development as it lacks features for version control and managing configurations across teams.

6. Environments: Docker Compose excels in managing complex multi-container applications that require interaction between different services, making it ideal for development and production environments. Ngrok, on the other hand, is better suited for providing temporary, external access to local services, making it a handy tool for testing and showcasing projects in temporary environments.

In Summary, Docker Compose focuses on packaging and running applications in a consistent environment, while ngrok provides temporary external access to local services for testing and demo purposes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ngrok
ngrok
Docker Compose
Docker Compose

ngrok is a reverse proxy that creates a secure tunnel between from a public endpoint to a locally running web service. ngrok captures and analyzes all traffic over the tunnel for later inspection and replay.

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Expose any http service behind a NAT or firewall to the internet on a subdomain of ngrok.com;Expose any tcp service behind a NAT or firewall to the internet on a random port of ngrok.com;Inspect all http requests/responses that are transmitted over the tunnel;Replay any request that was transmitted over the tunnel
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.4K
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Forks
4.3K
GitHub Forks
5.5K
Stacks
419
Stacks
22.3K
Followers
457
Followers
16.5K
Votes
57
Votes
501
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Easy to use
  • 11
    Super-fast
  • 7
    Free
  • 6
    Awesome traffic analysis page
  • 5
    Reliable custom domains
Cons
  • 5
    Doesn't Support UDP
  • 1
    El tunel SSH cambia de dominio constantemente
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Integrations
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to ngrok, Docker Compose?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana