StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Docker Machine vs Rancher

Docker Machine vs Rancher

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rancher
Rancher
Stacks952
Followers1.5K
Votes644
Docker Machine
Docker Machine
Stacks430
Followers518
Votes12

Docker Machine vs Rancher: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Mechanism: Docker Machine is a tool that helps in creating and managing multiple Docker-host virtual machines, making it easier to install Docker Engine on them. On the other hand, Rancher is a powerful container management platform that simplifies the deployment, management, and scaling of containers across different environments.
  2. Cluster Orchestration: Docker Machine focuses on single-host setups and does not provide built-in cluster orchestration capabilities, requiring third-party tools for managing clusters. In contrast, Rancher offers robust cluster orchestration features out of the box, allowing users to easily create and manage container clusters across various infrastructure environments.
  3. Monitoring and Logging: Docker Machine does not natively include monitoring and logging capabilities, requiring additional tools to be integrated for comprehensive monitoring and logging. Rancher, on the other hand, provides built-in monitoring and logging features, making it easier for users to monitor the health and performance of their containerized applications.
  4. Networking Features: Docker Machine offers basic networking features to connect containers running on individual hosts but lacks advanced networking functionalities for managing complex network environments. Rancher comes with advanced networking capabilities, including support for different networking plugins and overlay networks, facilitating seamless communication between containers across clusters.
  5. User Interface: Docker Machine primarily relies on command-line interface (CLI) for interacting with and managing Docker hosts, which can be challenging for users who prefer graphical user interfaces. In contrast, Rancher provides an intuitive web-based user interface that simplifies container management tasks and offers a visual representation of container clusters, making it more user-friendly.
  6. Scalability and Extensibility: Docker Machine is suitable for small to medium-scale deployments and may face limitations in managing large-scale container infrastructures seamlessly. Rancher, on the other hand, is designed to scale efficiently and is highly extensible, allowing users to integrate with various external tools and services to enhance their container management workflows.

In Summary, the key differences between Docker Machine and Rancher lie in their deployment mechanisms, cluster orchestration capabilities, monitoring and logging features, networking functionalities, user interfaces, and scalability/extensibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rancher
Rancher
Docker Machine
Docker Machine

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Machine lets you create Docker hosts on your computer, on cloud providers, and inside your own data center. It creates servers, installs Docker on them, then configures the Docker client to talk to them.

Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources;User Management & Collaboration;Native Docker APIs & Tools;Monitoring and Logging;Connect Containers, Manage Disks, Deploy Load Balancers;Docker App Catalog; Included Kubernetes Distribution;Included Docker Swarm Distribution; Included Mesos Distribution;Infrastructure Management
-
Statistics
Stacks
952
Stacks
430
Followers
1.5K
Followers
518
Votes
644
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 103
    Easy to use
  • 79
    Open source and totally free
  • 63
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 58
    Load balancing and health check included
  • 58
    Simple
Cons
  • 10
    Hosting Rancher can be complicated
Pros
  • 12
    Easy docker hosts management
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Datadog
Datadog
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Drone.io
Drone.io
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Rancher, Docker Machine?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana