Docker vs Netflix OSS

Overview

Docker

Stacks194.2K

Followers143.8K

Votes3.9K

Netflix OSS

Stacks76

Followers145

Votes0

Docker vs Netflix OSS: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between Docker and Netflix OSS are crucial for understanding their respective roles in modern software development environments.

Architecture: Docker is a containerization platform that lets you package an application and all its dependencies into a standardized unit for software development, while Netflix OSS is a set of tools and libraries that Netflix uses to build highly resilient and scalable distributed systems.
Deployment Scope: Docker focuses on the packaging, distribution, and deployment of applications within containers, allowing for consistent delivery across different environments. In contrast, Netflix OSS provides a suite of tools for specific tasks like service discovery, load balancing, and fault tolerance within a distributed system.
Community Support: Docker has a vast community and ecosystem, making it easier to find support, documentation, and pre-built images for a wide range of applications. On the other hand, Netflix OSS, being specific to Netflix's needs, has a smaller community, which may limit the availability of resources and support for non-Netflix projects.
Learning Curve: Docker has gained popularity for its ease of use and straightforward containerization process, making it accessible to beginners and experienced developers alike. In comparison, Netflix OSS tools require a deeper understanding of distributed systems and cloud architectures, which can present a steeper learning curve for users.
Use Cases: Docker is versatile and suitable for various types of applications and environments, from small-scale projects to enterprise-level deployments. Netflix OSS, however, is tailored specifically for building large-scale, cloud-native applications that require robust resilience, scalability, and fault tolerance mechanisms.
Integration with Existing Systems: Docker can be seamlessly integrated into existing development workflows and infrastructure setups, enabling organizations to modernize their applications without significant disruptions. On the other hand, integrating Netflix OSS tools may require substantial changes to the existing architecture and development practices due to their specialized nature.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Docker and Netflix OSS is essential for choosing the right tools and technologies to meet specific software development and deployment requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Docker, Netflix OSS

Florian

IT DevOp at Agitos GmbH

Oct 22, 2019

Decided

lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.

483k views483k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Docker	Netflix OSS
The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere	It provides tools and services to get the most out of your (big) data. It also provides runtime containers, libraries and services that power microservices.
Integrated developer tools; open, portable images; shareable, reusable apps; framework-aware builds; standardized templates; multi-environment support; remote registry management; simple setup for Docker and Kubernetes; certified Kubernetes; application templates; enterprise controls; secure software supply chain; industry-leading container runtime; image scanning; access controls; image signing; caching and mirroring; image lifecycle; policy-based image promotion	-
Statistics
Stacks 194.2K	Stacks 76
Followers 143.8K	Followers 145
Votes 3.9K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 823 Rapid integration and build up 692 Isolation 521 Open source 505 Testability and reproducibility 460 Lightweight Cons 8 New versions == broken features 6 Documentation not always in sync 6 Unreliable networking 4 Moves quickly 3 Not Secure	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java Docker Compose VirtualBox Linux Amazon EC2 Container Service Docker Swarm boot2docker Kubernetes Docker Machine Vagrant	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Docker, Netflix OSS?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

LXD

LXD isn't a rewrite of LXC, in fact it's building on top of LXC to provide a new, better user experience. Under the hood, LXD uses LXC through liblxc and its Go binding to create and manage the containers. It's basically an alternative to LXC's tools and distribution template system with the added features that come from being controllable over the network.

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Related Comparisons

Docker vs Netflix OSS: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between Docker and Netflix OSS are crucial for understanding their respective roles in modern software development environments.

Architecture: Docker is a containerization platform that lets you package an application and all its dependencies into a standardized unit for software development, while Netflix OSS is a set of tools and libraries that Netflix uses to build highly resilient and scalable distributed systems.
Deployment Scope: Docker focuses on the packaging, distribution, and deployment of applications within containers, allowing for consistent delivery across different environments. In contrast, Netflix OSS provides a suite of tools for specific tasks like service discovery, load balancing, and fault tolerance within a distributed system.
Community Support: Docker has a vast community and ecosystem, making it easier to find support, documentation, and pre-built images for a wide range of applications. On the other hand, Netflix OSS, being specific to Netflix's needs, has a smaller community, which may limit the availability of resources and support for non-Netflix projects.
Learning Curve: Docker has gained popularity for its ease of use and straightforward containerization process, making it accessible to beginners and experienced developers alike. In comparison, Netflix OSS tools require a deeper understanding of distributed systems and cloud architectures, which can present a steeper learning curve for users.
Use Cases: Docker is versatile and suitable for various types of applications and environments, from small-scale projects to enterprise-level deployments. Netflix OSS, however, is tailored specifically for building large-scale, cloud-native applications that require robust resilience, scalability, and fault tolerance mechanisms.
Integration with Existing Systems: Docker can be seamlessly integrated into existing development workflows and infrastructure setups, enabling organizations to modernize their applications without significant disruptions. On the other hand, integrating Netflix OSS tools may require substantial changes to the existing architecture and development practices due to their specialized nature.

Docker vs Netflix OSS

Overview