Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs Netflix OSS: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Key differences between Docker and Netflix OSS are crucial for understanding their respective roles in modern software development environments.
Architecture: Docker is a containerization platform that lets you package an application and all its dependencies into a standardized unit for software development, while Netflix OSS is a set of tools and libraries that Netflix uses to build highly resilient and scalable distributed systems.
Deployment Scope: Docker focuses on the packaging, distribution, and deployment of applications within containers, allowing for consistent delivery across different environments. In contrast, Netflix OSS provides a suite of tools for specific tasks like service discovery, load balancing, and fault tolerance within a distributed system.
Community Support: Docker has a vast community and ecosystem, making it easier to find support, documentation, and pre-built images for a wide range of applications. On the other hand, Netflix OSS, being specific to Netflix's needs, has a smaller community, which may limit the availability of resources and support for non-Netflix projects.
Learning Curve: Docker has gained popularity for its ease of use and straightforward containerization process, making it accessible to beginners and experienced developers alike. In comparison, Netflix OSS tools require a deeper understanding of distributed systems and cloud architectures, which can present a steeper learning curve for users.
Use Cases: Docker is versatile and suitable for various types of applications and environments, from small-scale projects to enterprise-level deployments. Netflix OSS, however, is tailored specifically for building large-scale, cloud-native applications that require robust resilience, scalability, and fault tolerance mechanisms.
Integration with Existing Systems: Docker can be seamlessly integrated into existing development workflows and infrastructure setups, enabling organizations to modernize their applications without significant disruptions. On the other hand, integrating Netflix OSS tools may require substantial changes to the existing architecture and development practices due to their specialized nature.
In Summary, understanding the key differences between Docker and Netflix OSS is essential for choosing the right tools and technologies to meet specific software development and deployment requirements.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Easy setup6
- Fast and Portable6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- Highly useful3
- It's dope3
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Asdfd0
Pros of Netflix OSS
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3