Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
Docusaurus vs ReadMe.io: What are the differences?
- Built for Different Purposes: Docusaurus is primarily a documentation tool, designed to help developers build and maintain documentation websites. It provides a framework and easy-to-use tools for creating and organizing documentation, with a focus on open source projects. On the other hand, ReadMe.io is a broader platform that offers API documentation, developer portals, and other features beyond just documentation.
- Hosting and Deployment Options: Docusaurus websites can be deployed using static site generators like GitHub Pages or Netlify, which offer free hosting options. ReadMe.io, on the other hand, provides its own hosting and deployment infrastructure, making it easier for users to publish and manage their documentation without relying on third-party services.
- Customization and Theming: Docusaurus offers a wide range of customization options, allowing users to create a unique look and feel for their documentation websites. It provides a theming system that enables users to modify the design, layout, and colors of their websites. ReadMe.io, although it allows some customization, its options are more limited compared to Docusaurus.
- Frontend Framework Support: Docusaurus is built with React.js, a popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces. This means that developers familiar with React will find it easier to work with Docusaurus and leverage its component-based architecture. On the other hand, ReadMe.io uses a different stack and does not have direct integration with React or any other frontend framework.
- Community and Ecosystem: Docusaurus has a thriving community of developers, which means that users can benefit from community-contributed plugins, themes, and extensions. Additionally, because Docusaurus is open source, users can contribute to its development and help shape its future. ReadMe.io, although it has its own community, is more focused on providing a complete solution rather than community-driven extensions.
- Pricing Model: Docusaurus is an open source tool and completely free to use, making it an attractive choice for projects with limited budgets. On the other hand, ReadMe.io offers various pricing tiers, including free and paid plans, depending on the specific needs and requirements of the users.
In summary, Docusaurus is a documentation tool with extensive customization and theming options, built on React.js, and supported by a vibrant community. It is free and offers flexibility in hosting options. ReadMe.io, on the other hand, is a comprehensive platform that provides not only documentation solutions but also features like API documentation, developer portals, and its own hosting infrastructure, with more limited customization options and a different pricing model.
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MorePros of Docusaurus
Pros of ReadMe.io
Pros of Docusaurus
- Open Source8
- Self Hosted7
- Free to use3
- React3
- Easy customization3
- Jamstack3
- MDX3
- I18n3
- Versioning2
Pros of ReadMe.io
- Great UI18
- Easy15
- Customizable10
- Cute mascot10
- Looks great and is fun to use8
- It's friggin awesome5
- Make sample API calls inside the docs3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docusaurus
Cons of ReadMe.io
Cons of Docusaurus
Be the first to leave a con
Cons of ReadMe.io
- Support is awful4
- No backup and restore capability3
- Important parts of the CSS are locked2
- Document structure is severely restricted2
- Full of bugs2
- No notifications of edits by other users2
- Supports only two documents plus a blog1
- Does not support pre-request scripts1
- Random pages display content of other pages instead1
- Review and comment functionality is hard to work with1
- Navigation in user-facing copy is spotty1
- All admins have full editing rights1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
- No public GitHub repository available -
What is Docusaurus?
Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.
What is ReadMe.io?
It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jobs that mention Docusaurus and ReadMe.io as a desired skillset
What companies use Docusaurus?
What companies use ReadMe.io?
What companies use Docusaurus?
What companies use ReadMe.io?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Docusaurus?
What tools integrate with ReadMe.io?
What tools integrate with Docusaurus?
What tools integrate with ReadMe.io?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+6 14
15656
+30 27
18700
+25 12
2473
What are some alternatives to Docusaurus and ReadMe.io?
Confluence
Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.
Gitbook
It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team.
MkDocs
It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.
VuePress
A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.
Hugo
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.