Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

Docusaurus vs Wiki.js: What are the differences?

Docusaurus and Wiki.js are both popular platforms for creating websites, but they have key differences that set them apart. Here are six key differences between Docusaurus and Wiki.js:

  1. Hosting and Deployment: Docusaurus is designed to be hosted and deployed with ease on platforms like GitHub Pages or Netlify. It simplifies the process of publishing websites, making it ideal for projects that require frequent updates. On the other hand, Wiki.js is more focused on self-hosting, which allows users to have more control over their data and the hosting environment.

  2. Content Management: Docusaurus primarily focuses on creating static websites, with the ability to generate documentation sites from Markdown files. It offers a simple and intuitive content management system that is well-suited for projects that require organized documentation. In contrast, Wiki.js is a full-fledged wiki platform that provides a comprehensive content management system with features like revision history, user permissions, rich text editing, and more. It is better suited for collaborative projects that require extensive content management capabilities.

  3. Customization and Theming: Docusaurus offers a limited number of themes and customization options, making it quick and easy to set up a website with a consistent look and feel. However, it may not be as flexible for users who require extensive customization. On the other hand, Wiki.js provides a high level of customization and theming options, allowing users to tailor the appearance of their wiki to their specific needs and branding requirements.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Docusaurus has a large and active community, with a wide range of plugins and extensions available to enhance its functionality. It benefits from the popularity of frameworks like React and the support of the larger web development community. Wiki.js, while also having an active community, may not have the same breadth of plugins and extensions available. However, it provides a comprehensive set of features out-of-the-box, reducing the need for extensive customization.

  5. Documentation Features: Docusaurus provides features specifically tailored for documentation websites, such as automatic versioning, code highlighting, and search functionality. These features make it easy for users to create and maintain documentation sites. Wiki.js, on the other hand, offers a wider range of features suitable for general knowledge sharing, such as category management, attachments, tags, and advanced search capabilities.

  6. User Experience and Interface: Docusaurus focuses on providing a streamlined and minimalistic user experience. Its interface aims to be simple and easy to navigate, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise. Wiki.js, on the other hand, offers a more feature-rich interface with a broader range of functionalities, which may result in a steeper learning curve for some users.

In Summary, Docusaurus is best suited for projects that require easy hosting, simplified content management, and a fast, minimalistic user experience. On the other hand, Wiki.js excels in providing comprehensive content management capabilities, extensive customization options, and powerful wiki features, making it ideal for collaborative projects with complex knowledge sharing needs.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Docusaurus
Pros of Wiki.js
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 7
    Self Hosted
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
    Free to use
  • 3
  • 3
    Easy customization
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
    Fast speed by node.js
  • 1
    Open Source

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Docusaurus
Cons of Wiki.js
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      No tree structure by default

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Docusaurus?

    Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

    What is Wiki.js?

    It is an open source, modern and powerful wiki app based on Node.js, Git, and Markdown. It runs on the flamingly fast Node.js engine and is optimized to conserve CPU resources.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Docusaurus?
    What companies use Wiki.js?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Docusaurus or Wiki.js.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Docusaurus?
    What tools integrate with Wiki.js?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Docusaurus and Wiki.js?
    Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.
    It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team.
    It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.
    A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.
    Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
    See all alternatives