StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. DokuWiki vs Strapi

DokuWiki vs Strapi

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

DokuWiki
DokuWiki
Stacks72
Followers99
Votes0
Strapi
Strapi
Stacks720
Followers1.3K
Votes277
GitHub Stars70.2K
Forks9.2K

DokuWiki vs Strapi: What are the differences?

Key Differences between DokuWiki and Strapi

DokuWiki and Strapi are both content management systems, but they differ in several key aspects.

  1. Architecture: DokuWiki is a self-contained wiki software that stores its content in text files, making it simple to install and use. On the other hand, Strapi utilizes a headless CMS architecture, separating the back-end and front-end, enabling more flexibility and customization options.

  2. User Interface: DokuWiki has a user-friendly interface that emphasizes simplicity and accessibility, suitable for small-scale collaborations. In contrast, Strapi offers a more robust and customizable admin panel, suitable for larger enterprise projects with complex content management needs.

  3. Data Structure: DokuWiki stores its data in a hierarchical format using plain text files, while Strapi employs a database-centric approach, providing a structured and scalable data management solution with support for various databases like MongoDB, PostgreSQL, and SQLite.

  4. Extensibility: While both platforms offer plugin systems, the extensibility capabilities differ. DokuWiki has a wide range of plugins available, covering various functionalities like discussion forums and syntax highlighting. Strapi, being an API-driven CMS, supports extensions through custom APIs and is highly extensible for building custom plugins and integrations.

  5. API-First Approach: One of the major differences is Strapi's API-first approach that enables developers to build applications using its RESTful or GraphQL APIs, making it suitable for decoupled front-end development. DokuWiki, on the other hand, is primarily designed for traditional wiki-style content management.

  6. Scalability: Strapi is built to handle larger-scale projects, capable of managing high volumes of content and serving multiple users concurrently. DokuWiki, while efficient for small to medium-sized projects, might face limitations when it comes to scalability and handling large amounts of content.

In summary, DokuWiki is a lightweight and user-friendly wiki software focusing on simplicity, while Strapi is a feature-rich headless CMS offering scalability, extensibility, and an API-first approach for building complex, decoupled applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

DokuWiki
DokuWiki
Strapi
Strapi

It is a simple to use and highly versatile Open Source wiki software that doesn't require a database. It has clean and readable syntax. The ease of maintenance, backup and integration makes it an administrator's favorite. Built in access controls and authentication connectors make it especially useful in the enterprise context and the large number of plugins contributed by its vibrant community allow for a broad range of use cases beyond a traditional wiki.

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

-
Files structure; Controllers; Filters; Models; Attributes; Relations; Many-to-many; One-to-many; One-to-one; One-way; Lifecycle callbacks; Internationalization; Plugin; Plugin styles; Policies; Global policies; Scoped policies; Plugin policies; Public assets; Requests; Responses; Routing; Role-based access control; Services;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
70.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
Stacks
72
Stacks
720
Followers
99
Followers
1.3K
Votes
0
Votes
277
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 57
    Free
  • 40
    Open source
  • 28
    Self-hostable
  • 27
    Rapid development
  • 25
    API-based cms
Cons
  • 9
    Can be limiting
  • 8
    Internationalisation
  • 6
    A bit buggy
  • 5
    DB Migrations not seemless
Integrations
No integrations available
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Node.js
Node.js
Ruby
Ruby
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Gatsby
Gatsby
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Hugo
Hugo
Flask
Flask
Apache Cordova
Apache Cordova
Angular
Angular

What are some alternatives to DokuWiki, Strapi?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Joomla!

Joomla!

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack