StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. Dynomite vs Redis

Dynomite vs Redis

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redis
Redis
Stacks61.9K
Followers46.5K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars42
Forks6
Dynomite
Dynomite
Stacks20
Followers56
Votes9
GitHub Stars4.2K
Forks532

Dynomite vs Redis: What are the differences?

Introduction

Dynomite and Redis are both popular distributed key-value stores used for caching and data storage purposes.

Key Differences between Dynomite and Redis

  1. Architecture: Dynomite is designed as a distributed system where multiple Dynomite nodes form a ring topology, allowing for decentralized data storage and fault tolerance. Redis, on the other hand, follows a master-slave replication model, with a single master node and multiple slave nodes.

  2. Scalability: Dynomite is highly scalable and can handle large amounts of data and traffic by distributing it across multiple nodes in the cluster. Redis, while also scalable, has limitations in terms of the maximum amount of data it can handle on a single node due to its in-memory nature.

  3. Data Durability: Dynomite provides eventual consistency and does not guarantee immediate persistence of data. This makes it suitable for use cases where temporary data loss is acceptable, such as in caching scenarios. Redis, on the other hand, offers persistency options like writing data to disk or replication to ensure data durability.

  4. Data Model: Dynomite provides a simple key-value data model, resembling that of Redis. However, Redis supports additional complex data structures such as lists, sets, hashes, and sorted sets, making it more versatile for various use cases.

  5. Built-in Commands: Redis comes with a rich set of built-in commands, allowing for complex operations on data, such as atomic transactions and advanced querying. Dynomite, while supporting basic key-value operations, does not provide the same level of functionality and extensibility.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Redis has a larger and more active community, with extensive documentation, libraries, and tools available to support its usage. Dynomite, although it has a growing community, has a more limited ecosystem and may require more effort for integration and troubleshooting.

Summary

In summary, Dynomite and Redis differ in their architecture, scalability, data durability, supported data models, built-in commands, and community/ecosystem support. Understanding these differences is crucial when deciding which key-value store best suits specific use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Redis
Redis
Dynomite
Dynomite

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Dynomite is a generic dynamo implementation that can be used with many different key-value pair storage engines. Currently these include Redis and Memcached. Dynomite supports multi-datacenter replication and is designed for high availability.

-
Replication;Highly available reads;Pluggable Datastores;Standard open source Memcached/Redis ASCII protocol support;Scalable I/O event notification server;Peer-to-peer, and linearly scalable;Cold cache warm-up;Asymmetric multi-datacenter replications;Internode communication and Gossip;Functional in AWS and physical datacenter
Statistics
GitHub Stars
42
GitHub Stars
4.2K
GitHub Forks
6
GitHub Forks
532
Stacks
61.9K
Stacks
20
Followers
46.5K
Followers
56
Votes
3.9K
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 888
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 514
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
Cons
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL
Pros
  • 3
    Multi datacenters or regions
  • 2
    Low latency high throughput
  • 2
    Pluggable APIs (Currently have Redis/Memcached APIs)
  • 1
    Support many datastores: redis, memcached, rocksdb, etc
  • 1
    Scale
Integrations
No integrations available
Memcached
Memcached

What are some alternatives to Redis, Dynomite?

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Navicat

Navicat

Powerful database management & design tool for Win, Mac & Linux. With intuitive GUI, user manages MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, Oracle & PostgreSQL DB easily.

Azure Redis Cache

Azure Redis Cache

It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.

KeyDB

KeyDB

KeyDB is a fully open source database that aims to make use of all hardware resources. KeyDB makes it possible to breach boundaries often dictated by price and complexity.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot