StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Log Management
  5. ELK vs Logback

ELK vs Logback

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ELK
ELK
Stacks863
Followers941
Votes23
Logback
Logback
Stacks5.6K
Followers76
Votes0

ELK vs Logback: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Configuration: The key difference between ELK and Logback is how they handle configurations. ELK uses a centralized configuration that requires a separate instance of a Kibana dashboard for configuration management, while Logback relies on traditional XML or groovy configuration files that are specific to the application.

  2. Data Processing: ELK focuses on log processing, aggregation, and visualization through Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana, making it a comprehensive log management solution. On the other hand, Logback primarily serves as a logging framework without built-in data processing capabilities, requiring additional tools for log analysis and visualization.

  3. Scalability: ELK offers horizontal scalability by allowing users to easily expand the cluster size to accommodate increasing log data volumes. In contrast, Logback's scalability is limited to the capabilities of the application server where it is deployed, making it less flexible in handling larger log datasets.

  4. Flexibility: ELK provides flexibility in managing various types of log data from multiple sources by supporting custom log formats and structures through Logstash configurations. Logback, while flexible in configuring logging behavior within an application, lacks the ability to handle a diverse range of log formats and sources efficiently.

  5. Search and Analysis: With its integrated Elasticsearch capabilities, ELK enables users to perform advanced search queries, data analysis, and visualization on log data stored in the cluster. Logback, being primarily a logging framework, lacks the advanced search and analysis features offered by ELK, requiring users to use third-party tools for log exploration and analysis.

  6. Real-time Monitoring: ELK excels in providing real-time log monitoring and alerting functionalities through Kibana's visualization dashboards and alerting mechanisms, ensuring timely identification of critical log events. Logback, while capable of logging events in real-time, does not offer built-in monitoring and alerting features, requiring additional setup for real-time log monitoring.

In Summary, ELK and Logback differ in configuration management, data processing capabilities, scalability, flexibility in handling diverse log data formats, search and analysis functionalities, and real-time monitoring capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ELK
ELK
Logback
Logback

It is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.

It is intended as a successor to the popular log4j project. It is divided into three modules, logback-core, logback-classic and logback-access. The logback-core module lays the groundwork for the other two modules, logback-classic natively implements the SLF4J API so that you can readily switch back and forth between logback and other logging frameworks and logback-access module integrates with Servlet containers, such as Tomcat and Jetty, to provide HTTP-access log functionality.

Statistics
Stacks
863
Stacks
5.6K
Followers
941
Followers
76
Votes
23
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Open source
  • 4
    Can run locally
  • 3
    Good for startups with monetary limitations
  • 1
    External Network Goes Down You Aren't Without Logging
  • 1
    Easy to setup
Cons
  • 5
    Elastic Search is a resource hog
  • 3
    Logstash configuration is a pain
  • 1
    Bad for startups with personal limitations
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to ELK, Logback?

Papertrail

Papertrail

Papertrail helps detect, resolve, and avoid infrastructure problems using log messages. Papertrail's practicality comes from our own experience as sysadmins, developers, and entrepreneurs.

Logmatic

Logmatic

Get a clear overview of what is happening across your distributed environments, and spot the needle in the haystack in no time. Build dynamic analyses and identify improvements for your software, your user experience and your business.

Loggly

Loggly

It is a SaaS solution to manage your log data. There is nothing to install and updates are automatically applied to your Loggly subdomain.

Logentries

Logentries

Logentries makes machine-generated log data easily accessible to IT operations, development, and business analysis teams of all sizes. With the broadest platform support and an open API, Logentries brings the value of log-level data to any system, to any team member, and to a community of more than 25,000 worldwide users.

Logstash

Logstash

Logstash is a tool for managing events and logs. You can use it to collect logs, parse them, and store them for later use (like, for searching). If you store them in Elasticsearch, you can view and analyze them with Kibana.

Graylog

Graylog

Centralize and aggregate all your log files for 100% visibility. Use our powerful query language to search through terabytes of log data to discover and analyze important information.

Sematext

Sematext

Sematext pulls together performance monitoring, logs, user experience and synthetic monitoring that tools organizations need to troubleshoot performance issues faster.

Fluentd

Fluentd

Fluentd collects events from various data sources and writes them to files, RDBMS, NoSQL, IaaS, SaaS, Hadoop and so on. Fluentd helps you unify your logging infrastructure.

Sumo Logic

Sumo Logic

Cloud-based machine data analytics platform that enables companies to proactively identify availability and performance issues in their infrastructure, improve their security posture and enhance application rollouts. Companies using Sumo Logic reduce their mean-time-to-resolution by 50% and can save hundreds of thousands of dollars, annually. Customers include Netflix, Medallia, Orange, and GoGo Inflight.

Splunk

Splunk

It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana