Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Elm vs Svelte: What are the differences?
Key Differences Between Elm and Svelte
Elm and Svelte are both frontend development frameworks that aim to simplify web application development. However, they differ in several key aspects. Here are the key differences between Elm and Svelte:
Language: Elm uses its own programming language, whereas Svelte uses JavaScript. Elm has a statically typed functional programming language, while Svelte relies on JavaScript's dynamic typing and object-oriented programming features. This difference in language choice impacts the syntax, development workflow, and overall developer experience.
Rendering Approach: Elm follows a virtual DOM approach, where the entire DOM is reconstructed each time there is a state change. Svelte, on the other hand, compiles the components at build time and generates highly optimized JavaScript code. This results in efficient rendering with minimal runtime overhead, making Svelte faster in terms of performance compared to Elm.
Size and Bundle: Elm tends to have a larger code bundle size compared to Svelte. Elm includes its standard library in the bundle, adding to the overall size, while Svelte can create smaller and more optimized bundles by only importing the necessary components and dependencies, resulting in faster load times.
Component Reusability: While both Elm and Svelte promote component-based development, Svelte provides more flexibility when it comes to reusability. Svelte allows easy sharing of components across different projects and frameworks using its web component syntax, enabling seamless integration with existing codebases. Elm, on the other hand, has a more opinionated and isolated approach to component reuse within its ecosystem.
Debugging and Tooling: Elm provides a rich development experience with powerful in-browser time-traveling debugger and comprehensive error messages. It also enforces strong typing, which helps catch bugs early on during development. Svelte, on the other hand, offers a broader range of tooling and easier integration with existing JavaScript ecosystems, such as using popular debugging tools like Chrome DevTools.
Community and Ecosystem: Elm has a smaller but highly active and supportive community, with an emphasis on reliable and robust code. It has a curated package ecosystem that ensures quality and reliability. Svelte, on the other hand, has a larger community and a rapidly growing ecosystem. It benefits from its JavaScript compatibility, allowing developers to leverage existing JavaScript libraries and frameworks when needed.
In summary, Elm and Svelte differ in terms of their programming language, rendering approach, bundle size, component reusability, debugging and tooling capabilities, as well as their respective communities and ecosystems. Building with Elm provides a statically typed and functional programming experience with strong guarantees, while Svelte offers a more dynamic and efficient approach with seamless integration into the JavaScript ecosystem.
Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.
Svelte 3 is exacly what I'm looking for that Vue is not made for.
It has a iterable dom just like angular but very low overhead.
This is going to be used with the application.
for old/ lite devices . ie. * android tv, * micro linux, * possibly text based web browser for ascci and/or linux framebuffer * android go devices * android One devices
Pros of Elm
- Code stays clean45
- Great type system44
- No Runtime Exceptions40
- Fun33
- Easy to understand28
- Type safety23
- Correctness22
- JS fatigue17
- Ecosystem agrees on one Application Architecture12
- Declarative12
- Friendly compiler messages10
- Fast rendering8
- If it compiles, it runs7
- Welcoming community7
- Stable ecosystem5
- 'Batteries included'4
- Package.elm-lang.org2
Pros of Svelte
- Performance58
- Reactivity40
- Components35
- Simplicity35
- Javascript compiler (do that browsers don't have to)34
- Lightweight30
- Near to no learning curve28
- Real Reactivity26
- Fast as vanilajs26
- All in one22
- Compiler based18
- Use existing js libraries18
- SSR17
- Scalable16
- Very easy for beginners16
- Composable13
- No runtime overhead12
- Ease of use12
- Built in store10
- Typescript9
- Start with pure html + css7
- Best Developer Experience7
- Templates6
- Speed4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Elm
- No typeclasses -> repitition (i.e. map has 130versions)3
- JS interop can not be async2
- JS interoperability a bit more involved2
- More code is required1
- No JSX/Template1
- Main developer enforces "the correct" style hard1
- No communication with users1
- Backwards compability breaks between releases1
Cons of Svelte
- Event Listener Overload3
- Little to no libraries2
- Complex2
- Learning Curve2
- Hard to learn2