Express Gateway vs seneca

Overview

seneca

Stacks29

Followers42

Votes2

GitHub Stars4

Forks1

Express Gateway

Stacks62

Followers167

Votes10

Express Gateway vs seneca: What are the differences?

Architecture: Express Gateway is a microservices API Gateway that is built upon Express.js and focuses on providing a scalable, flexible, and easy-to-configure gateway solution. On the other hand, Seneca is a microservices framework that allows developers to build network-based applications in a decentralized way by employing a message-based approach.
Extension support: Express Gateway provides a wide range of plugins and extensions that can be easily integrated into the gateway, enabling developers to extend its functionality and customize it according to their specific requirements. In contrast, Seneca offers a limited number of plugins and focuses more on a core set of functionalities that can be extended through custom code.
Configuration: Express Gateway allows for configuration through YAML and JSON files, making it easier for developers to define their API gateway settings and policies. Seneca, on the other hand, requires developers to define configurations programmatically within their codebase, which may be more challenging for some users.
Scalability: Express Gateway is designed to be horizontally scalable, allowing it to handle increasing traffic loads by adding more instances of the gateway as needed. Seneca, while supporting some level of scalability through its message-passing architecture, may require more manual effort and configuration to achieve the same level of scalability as Express Gateway.
Community and Support: Express Gateway has a larger community and active support from the maintainers, providing developers with a wealth of resources, documentation, and tutorials to help them get started and troubleshoot any issues. Seneca, while having its own community, may not have as extensive resources and support available.
Use case focus: Express Gateway is particularly suited for handling API traffic and serving as a gateway for microservices architectures. On the other hand, Seneca is more focused on the development of microservices themselves and may not provide as robust a solution for API gateway functionalities.

In Summary, Express Gateway and Seneca differ in terms of architecture, extension support, configuration methods, scalability, community support, and use case focus.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

seneca	Express Gateway
Seneca is a toolkit for organizing the business logic of your app. You can break down your app into "stuff that happens", rather than focusing on data models or managing dependencies.	A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.
pattern matching: a wonderfully flexible way to handle business requirements;transport independence: how messages get to the right server is not something you should have to worry about;maturity: 5 years in production (before we called it micro-services), but was once taken out by lightning;deep and wide ecosystem of plugins	Authentication;Authorization;API Management;Microservices;JSON Web Token (JWT);OAuth2;Custom Plugins;Consumer Mgmt;YAML Driven; REST API;Pipelines;Built-in Policies;Hot Reload and Restart;Actions & Conditions;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 29	Stacks 62
Followers 42	Followers 167
Votes 2	Votes 10
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Multi transports support	Pros 4 Microservices, Body manipulation 3 Custom Plugins 3 Amazing api gwy. Easy and powerful configuration Cons 2 Deprecated
Integrations
Node.js	Prometheus Google Kubernetes Engine Kubernetes AWS Lambda Docker Auth0 StatsD Node.js Azure Kubernetes Service ExpressJS

What are some alternatives to seneca, Express Gateway?

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

Zuul

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Ocelot

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Micro

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

Related Comparisons

Express Gateway vs seneca: What are the differences?

Architecture: Express Gateway is a microservices API Gateway that is built upon Express.js and focuses on providing a scalable, flexible, and easy-to-configure gateway solution. On the other hand, Seneca is a microservices framework that allows developers to build network-based applications in a decentralized way by employing a message-based approach.
Extension support: Express Gateway provides a wide range of plugins and extensions that can be easily integrated into the gateway, enabling developers to extend its functionality and customize it according to their specific requirements. In contrast, Seneca offers a limited number of plugins and focuses more on a core set of functionalities that can be extended through custom code.
Configuration: Express Gateway allows for configuration through YAML and JSON files, making it easier for developers to define their API gateway settings and policies. Seneca, on the other hand, requires developers to define configurations programmatically within their codebase, which may be more challenging for some users.
Scalability: Express Gateway is designed to be horizontally scalable, allowing it to handle increasing traffic loads by adding more instances of the gateway as needed. Seneca, while supporting some level of scalability through its message-passing architecture, may require more manual effort and configuration to achieve the same level of scalability as Express Gateway.
Community and Support: Express Gateway has a larger community and active support from the maintainers, providing developers with a wealth of resources, documentation, and tutorials to help them get started and troubleshoot any issues. Seneca, while having its own community, may not have as extensive resources and support available.
Use case focus: Express Gateway is particularly suited for handling API traffic and serving as a gateway for microservices architectures. On the other hand, Seneca is more focused on the development of microservices themselves and may not provide as robust a solution for API gateway functionalities.

In Summary, Express Gateway and Seneca differ in terms of architecture, extension support, configuration methods, scalability, community support, and use case focus.

Express Gateway vs seneca

Overview