StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. F-droid vs Visual Studio App Center

F-droid vs Visual Studio App Center

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

F-droid
F-droid
Stacks4
Followers2
Votes0
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center
Stacks113
Followers232
Votes4

F-droid vs Visual Studio App Center: What are the differences?

# Introduction
F-droid and Visual Studio App Center are both platforms used for deploying and managing mobile applications. Despite sharing similar purposes, they possess distinct differences that cater to different needs of developers.

1. **Licensing Model**: F-droid exclusively supports open-source applications, ensuring that all the software available on the platform is free and open for anyone to modify and distribute. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center does not impose any restrictions on the licensing model, allowing both open-source and proprietary applications to be deployed and managed.

2. **Supported Platforms**: F-droid primarily focuses on Android applications, providing a curated selection of free and open-source software for the Android platform. In contrast, Visual Studio App Center supports a broader range of platforms, including Android, iOS, macOS, Windows, and Xamarin, making it a versatile solution for developers working across multiple operating systems.

3. **Continuous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD)**: Visual Studio App Center offers robust CI/CD capabilities, allowing developers to automate the build, test, and deployment processes for their applications. In comparison, F-droid does not provide built-in CI/CD features, requiring developers to set up their own pipelines for automating these tasks.

4. **App Distribution**: F-droid focuses on distributing apps through its own repository, where users can discover and install open-source applications directly. On the other hand, Visual Studio App Center offers more flexibility in app distribution, allowing developers to distribute apps through public app stores, private app stores, or direct links.

5. **Analytics and Monitoring**: Visual Studio App Center provides comprehensive analytics and monitoring tools, enabling developers to track user engagement, crashes, and performance metrics for their applications. In contrast, F-droid does not offer built-in analytics and monitoring features, requiring developers to integrate third-party tools for this functionality.

6. **Community and Support**: F-droid is driven by a strong community of open-source enthusiasts and developers who contribute to the repository's maintenance and curation. In comparison, Visual Studio App Center is backed by Microsoft's extensive resources and support network, offering professional assistance and documentation for developers using the platform.

In Summary, F-droid focuses on open-source Android applications with a strict licensing model, while Visual Studio App Center supports multiple platforms, offers robust CI/CD capabilities, and provides comprehensive analytics and monitoring tools for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

F-droid
F-droid
Visual Studio App Center
Visual Studio App Center

It is is a robot with a passion for Free and Open Source (FOSS) software on the Android platform. On this site you’ll find a repository of FOSS apps, along with an Android client to perform installations and updates, and news, reviews and other features covering all things Android and software-freedom related.

Automate the lifecycle of your iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS apps. Connect your repo and within minutes build in the cloud, test on thousands of real devices, distribute to beta testers and app stores, and monitor real-world usage with crash and analytics data. All in one place.

-
Build; Test; Distribute; Crashes; Diagnostics; Analytics; Push; CD/CI;
Statistics
Stacks
4
Stacks
113
Followers
2
Followers
232
Votes
0
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Show error issues for mobile devices
  • 1
    Slack integration
  • 1
    For Mobile apps diagnostics and tracking
  • 1
    Bug tracking integration
Integrations
Android Studio
Android Studio
Android SDK
Android SDK
Android OS
Android OS
Android Room
Android Room
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to F-droid, Visual Studio App Center?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase