StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. OpenShift vs fabric8

OpenShift vs fabric8

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.4K
Votes517
GitHub Stars885
Forks510
fabric8
fabric8
Stacks37
Followers113
Votes1
GitHub Stars1.8K
Forks498

OpenShift vs fabric8: What are the differences?

Introduction

OpenShift and fabric8 are both popular platforms that provide solutions for application development and deployment. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.

  1. Ease of Use: OpenShift offers a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easier for developers to navigate and manage their applications. On the other hand, fabric8 focuses more on providing a command-line interface, which may be preferred by developers who are comfortable working with terminals and command prompts.

  2. Scalability: OpenShift is known for its robust scalability features, allowing applications to easily handle a large number of users and traffic. It provides automatic scaling options and built-in load balancing capabilities. In contrast, fabric8 offers more flexibility in terms of scalability, allowing developers to choose the most suitable approach for their specific application requirements.

  3. Community Support: OpenShift has a large and active community of users and contributors, which means that there is a wealth of resources available for developers who need help or want to learn more about the platform. On the other hand, fabric8 may have a smaller community compared to OpenShift, but it still offers a supportive ecosystem where developers can get assistance and share their experiences.

  4. Integration with Kubernetes: OpenShift is built on top of Kubernetes, an open-source container orchestration platform. This integration allows developers to take advantage of the rich features and capabilities provided by Kubernetes while also benefiting from the additional tools and functionalities offered by OpenShift. In contrast, fabric8 provides its own set of tools and frameworks for managing containers and microservices, without the direct integration with Kubernetes.

  5. Supported Platforms: OpenShift supports a wide range of platforms, including public cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, as well as on-premises deployments. This flexibility enables developers to choose the environment that suits their needs best. On the other hand, while fabric8 can also be deployed on various platforms, it may require more configuration and customization to work seamlessly with different infrastructure setups.

  6. Vendor Lock-In: OpenShift is developed and maintained by Red Hat, a well-known and trusted enterprise software provider. While this can provide assurance and stability for organizations using OpenShift, it may also create a dependency on Red Hat's ecosystem. In contrast, fabric8 is an open-source project with contributions from multiple organizations and individuals, which reduces the risk of vendor lock-in and allows for more freedom and flexibility in terms of customization and integration.

In Summary, OpenShift and fabric8 offer different approaches to application development and deployment. OpenShift focuses on ease of use, scalability, and integration with Kubernetes, while fabric8 prioritizes flexibility, community support, and independence from vendor lock-in. The choice between the two platforms depends on the specific requirements and preferences of developers and organizations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
fabric8
fabric8

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

fabric8 makes it easy to create microservices, build, test and deploy them via Continuous Delivery pipelines then run and manage them with Continuous Improvement and ChatOps.

Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise);OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift;OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play;Autoscaling- OpenShift can scale your application by adding additional instances of your application and enabling clustering. Alternatively, you can manually scale the amount of resources with which your application is deployed when needed;OpenShift by Red Hat is built on open-source technologies (Red Hat Enterprise Linux- RHEL);One Click Deployment- Deploying to the OpenShift platform is as easy a clicking a button or entering a "Git push" command
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
885
GitHub Stars
1.8K
GitHub Forks
510
GitHub Forks
498
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
37
Followers
1.4K
Followers
113
Votes
517
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 99
    Good free plan
  • 63
    Open Source
  • 47
    Easy setup
  • 43
    Nodejs support
  • 42
    Well documented
Cons
  • 2
    Decisions are made for you, limiting your options
  • 2
    License cost
  • 1
    Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to build and automate integration testing
Integrations
No integrations available
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift, fabric8?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot