Falco vs Network Polygraph: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Falco and Network Polygraph in terms of key differences.

1. **Data Collection**: Falco focuses on monitoring system calls and activities within containers to detect abnormal behavior and security threats, while Network Polygraph focuses on collecting network traffic data and analyzing it to identify anomalies and potential security risks.
2. **Scope of Monitoring**: Falco primarily monitors containerized environments and activities at the system call level, ensuring that security threats are detected within the containerized infrastructure. In contrast, Network Polygraph extends its monitoring capabilities to network traffic, providing insights into network-based threats and vulnerabilities.
3. **Alerting Mechanisms**: Falco generates alerts based on system call behavior and activities within containers, enabling real-time threat detection and response. On the other hand, Network Polygraph utilizes network traffic analysis to trigger alerts for suspicious network behavior, supporting rapid incident response.
4. **Deployment Flexibility**: Falco can be easily deployed within Kubernetes environments to secure containerized workloads, enhancing the overall security posture of the container ecosystem. In contrast, Network Polygraph offers deployment flexibility across various network infrastructures, providing a comprehensive security outlook for network-based assets.
5. **Supported Security Protocols**: Falco focuses on system call monitoring and container security, offering insights into container-specific threats and vulnerabilities. Network Polygraph, on the other hand, supports a wide range of security protocols and standards, enabling comprehensive network security monitoring and analysis.
6. **Integration Capabilities**: Falco seamlessly integrates with Kubernetes environments and cloud-native applications, facilitating cohesive security monitoring within containerized ecosystems. Network Polygraph offers integration capabilities with network monitoring tools and security platforms, ensuring seamless interoperability in diverse network environments.

In Summary, the key differences between Falco and Network Polygraph lie in their focus areas, data collection methods, monitoring scopes, alerting mechanisms, deployment flexibility, and supported security protocols.