StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitLab vs fastlane

GitLab vs fastlane

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
fastlane
fastlane
Stacks716
Followers437
Votes74
GitHub Stars40.6K
Forks6.0K

GitLab vs fastlane: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitLab and fastlane are both popular software tools used for different purposes in software development. GitLab is a web-based Git repository management tool that provides a platform for version control, CI/CD pipelines, and collaboration features. On the other hand, fastlane is a tool used for automating the release process of iOS and Android apps. Although both tools serve different purposes, there are key differences between GitLab and fastlane.

  1. Integration with CI/CD pipelines: GitLab provides built-in CI/CD functionality which allows developers to automate the testing, building, and deployment of their projects. It offers a seamless integration with GitLab repositories, making it easy to set up and manage the pipelines directly within the GitLab platform. On the other hand, fastlane automates the release process of mobile apps by providing a set of powerful tools and integrations with popular CI/CD solutions like Jenkins and Travis CI. It focuses specifically on automating the deployment of apps to app stores, handling code signing, and managing beta testing processes.

  2. Scope of functionality: GitLab offers a wide range of features beyond version control and CI/CD. It includes project management tools, issue tracking, code review, and collaboration features, making it a comprehensive platform for software development teams. Fastlane, on the other hand, is a more specialized tool focused on automating the release process of mobile apps. It provides specific functionalities related to app deployment and release management, such as managing provisioning profiles, uploading app builds to app stores, and running tests on various devices and simulators.

  3. Ease of use: GitLab provides a user-friendly web interface for managing repositories, pipelines, and collaboration features. It offers a visually appealing and intuitive interface that makes it easy for developers to navigate through projects and perform various tasks. Fastlane, although powerful, requires more technical knowledge and configuration to set up and integrate with the app development process. It involves writing configuration files and running commands from the command line, which may require a steeper learning curve compared to GitLab.

  4. Community and support: GitLab has a large and active community of users, with extensive documentation and support resources available. It has a well-established presence in the software development community and provides enterprise-level support options for organizations. Fastlane, on the other hand, has a smaller community compared to GitLab, but it is rapidly growing in popularity among mobile app developers. It has a dedicated GitHub repository and a community-driven support forum where users can seek help and contribute to the project.

  5. Supported platforms: GitLab is a platform-agnostic tool that can be used for managing any type of software project, regardless of the programming language or platform. It supports Git version control system and can be hosted on-premises or in the cloud. Fastlane, on the other hand, is specifically designed for automating the release process of iOS and Android apps. It provides features and integrations that are tailored for mobile app development and is not suitable for managing other types of projects.

In summary, GitLab is a comprehensive web-based Git repository management tool that offers version control, CI/CD pipelines, and collaboration features, while fastlane is a specialized tool focused on automating the release process of iOS and Android apps, providing features like code signing, app deployment, and beta testing. The key differences between GitLab and fastlane lie in their scope of functionality, integration with CI/CD pipelines, ease of use, community support, and supported platforms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, fastlane

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
fastlane
fastlane

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Connect all build tools together;Define multiple lanes for different needs;Jenkins Integration;Extend by adding your own build steps;Deploy from any computer;Release new app updates with the push of a button
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
40.6K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
6.0K
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
716
Followers
54.5K
Followers
437
Votes
2.5K
Votes
74
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Pros
  • 20
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Open Source
  • 13
    Itunes connect deployment
  • 11
    Incredible flexability
  • 9
    Third party integrations
Integrations
No integrations available
Testmunk
Testmunk
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
TestFlight
TestFlight
HockeyApp
HockeyApp
HipChat
HipChat
Crashlytics
Crashlytics
Travis CI
Travis CI
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack

What are some alternatives to GitLab, fastlane?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Bitrise

Bitrise

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

Buddybuild

Buddybuild

Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana