StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Faye vs SignalR

Faye vs SignalR

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Faye
Faye
Stacks29
Followers34
Votes24
GitHub Stars4.4K
Forks369
SignalR
SignalR
Stacks656
Followers1.2K
Votes146
GitHub Stars9.3K
Forks2.3K

Faye vs SignalR: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will outline the key differences between Faye and SignalR for website developers.

1. **Transport Protocol Support**: Faye primarily uses WebSocket as its main transport protocol, providing a full-duplex communication channel between the client and server. On the other hand, SignalR supports multiple transport protocols such as WebSocket, Server-Sent Events, Forever Frame, and Long Polling, offering flexibility in communication options. 

2. **Scalability**: Faye is more suitable for small to medium-scale applications due to its simplicity and lightweight nature. In contrast, SignalR is designed for large-scale real-time web applications and provides features like scale-out using backplanes to handle multiple servers and clients efficiently.

3. **Platforms Supported**: Faye is mostly used in Node.js applications as a Node.js module but can also be implemented in other languages like Ruby and PHP. SignalR, on the other hand, is primarily intended for use with Microsoft technologies, including .NET, ASP.NET, and Azure, making it more suitable for developers using the Microsoft ecosystem.

4. **Community Support**: Faye has a smaller community compared to SignalR, which is supported by a larger developer community as part of the broader Microsoft ecosystem. This difference can impact the availability of resources, documentation, and community-driven plugins and extensions.

5. **Client Compatibility**: Faye can work with a variety of clients that support WebSocket protocol, including modern web browsers and mobile devices. SignalR, with its multi-protocol support, ensures compatibility with a wider range of clients, including older browsers that may not fully support WebSocket.

6. **Customization and Flexibility**: Faye is known for its simplicity and ease of use but may lack some advanced features and customization options compared to SignalR, which provides more flexibility through hubs, persistent connections, and a rich API for real-time web application development.

In Summary, these key differences between Faye and SignalR highlight their distinctive features in terms of transport protocol support, scalability, platforms supported, community support, client compatibility, and customization options for web developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Faye
Faye
SignalR
SignalR

Faye is a set of tools for simple publish-subscribe messaging between web clients. It ships with easy-to-use message routing servers for Node.js and Rack applications, and clients that can be used on the server and in the browser.

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.4K
GitHub Stars
9.3K
GitHub Forks
369
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
29
Stacks
656
Followers
34
Followers
1.2K
Votes
24
Votes
146
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Simple
  • 5
    Node.js
  • 5
    Open source
  • 2
    Scalable
  • 2
    Ruby (EventMachine)
Pros
  • 32
    Supports .NET server
  • 25
    Real-time
  • 18
    Free
  • 16
    Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling
  • 15
    WebSockets
Cons
  • 2
    Expertise hard to get
  • 2
    Requires jQuery
  • 1
    Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions
  • 1
    Weak iOS and Android support
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to Faye, SignalR?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

8base

8base

A cloud service designed to power enterprise-grade web and mobile applications that require support for large numbers of users, complex data and transactional requirements, comprehensive role-based security and a modern look-and-feel.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase