FF4J vs Optimizely Rollouts

Overview

Optimizely Rollouts

Stacks4

Followers28

Votes0

FF4J

Stacks7

Followers16

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.4K

Forks286

FF4J vs Optimizely Rollouts: What are the differences?

Primary Focus: FF4J primarily focuses on feature toggles and switches, enabling controlled feature deployment and release management. In contrast, Optimizely Rollouts focuses on feature flags for controlled feature releases, targeting specific user segments for A/B testing and experimentation.
Integration Capabilities: FF4J provides seamless integration with various frameworks and languages, such as Java, Spring, and REST APIs, allowing for easy implementation and adoption. On the other hand, Optimizely Rollouts offers integration with popular development tools, such as GitHub and Slack, for streamlined collaboration and workflow enhancements.
Open Source vs. Commercial Solution: FF4J is an open-source feature management solution, allowing users to customize and extend its functionality as needed. Comparatively, Optimizely Rollouts is a commercial platform with advanced features like feature experimentation and targeting, suitable for enterprises requiring robust feature management capabilities.
Community Support: FF4J has a vibrant community of developers contributing to its development and offering support through forums and documentation. In contrast, Optimizely Rollouts provides dedicated customer support and resources for users, ensuring timely assistance and guidance when needed.
Deployment Flexibility: FF4J offers flexibility in deployment options, supporting on-premise, cloud, or hybrid environments based on individual preferences and requirements. Optimizely Rollouts, while cloud-based, provides scalability and reliability for handling feature management at scale across different applications and projects.
Feature Experimentation Features: Optimizely Rollouts offers advanced feature experimentation capabilities, including A/B testing, feature targeting, and analytics, empowering teams to make data-driven decisions and optimize feature performance based on user feedback and behavior.

In Summary, FF4J and Optimizely Rollouts differ in their primary focus, integration capabilities, open-source versus commercial nature, community support, deployment flexibility, and feature experimentation features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Optimizely Rollouts	FF4J
It is unlimited free feature flags and rollouts built on an enterprise-grade platform. Manage your features remotely and roll them out gradually to targeted audiences, without re-deploying your code. Connect Rollouts with Jira and invite your product and engineering teams to work together.	It is an implementation of Feature Toggle pattern : Enable and disable features or your applications at runtime thanks to dedicated web console, REST API, JMX or even CLI. It handle also properties and provide generic interfaces.
Unlimited feature flags; Staged rollouts; REST API; Roll out everywhere; Change history; Audience targeting; Cloud dashboard; Advanced user permissions; Enterprise security and compliance	Feature Toggle; Role-based Toggling; Strategy-based Toggling; AOP-driven Toggling; Features Monitoring; Web Console; Wide choice of Databases; Spring Boot Starter; Command Line Interface
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 1.4K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 286
Stacks 4	Stacks 7
Followers 28	Followers 16
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
React Python C# Jira Node.js Java JavaScript Golang Ruby PHP	PostgreSQL Elasticsearch MongoDB Cassandra MariaDB Spring Boot Java Redis Amazon DynamoDB Consul

What are some alternatives to Optimizely Rollouts, FF4J?

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

ConfigCat

Cross-platform feature flag service for Teams. It is a hosted or on-premise service with a web app for feature management, and SDKs for all major programming languages and technologies.

Unleash Hosted

It is a simple feature management system. It gives you great overview of all feature toggles across all your applications. You decide who is exposed to which feature.

guava

The Guava project contains several of Google's core libraries that we rely on in our Java-based projects: collections, caching, primitives support, concurrency libraries, common annotations, string processing, I/O, and so forth.

LaunchDarkly

Serving over 200 billion feature flags daily to help software teams build better software, faster. LaunchDarkly helps eliminate risk for developers and operations teams from the software development cycle.

Airship

Airship is a modern product flagging framework that gives the right people total control over what your customers see & experience - without deploying code.

Thymeleaf

It is a modern server-side Java template engine for both web and standalone environments. It is aimed at creating elegant web code while adding powerful features and retaining prototyping abilities.

JSF

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

Flagr

Open-source Go microservice supports feature flagging, A/B testing, and dynamic configuration. Logs data records and impressions.

Related Comparisons

FF4J vs Optimizely Rollouts: What are the differences?

Primary Focus: FF4J primarily focuses on feature toggles and switches, enabling controlled feature deployment and release management. In contrast, Optimizely Rollouts focuses on feature flags for controlled feature releases, targeting specific user segments for A/B testing and experimentation.
Integration Capabilities: FF4J provides seamless integration with various frameworks and languages, such as Java, Spring, and REST APIs, allowing for easy implementation and adoption. On the other hand, Optimizely Rollouts offers integration with popular development tools, such as GitHub and Slack, for streamlined collaboration and workflow enhancements.
Open Source vs. Commercial Solution: FF4J is an open-source feature management solution, allowing users to customize and extend its functionality as needed. Comparatively, Optimizely Rollouts is a commercial platform with advanced features like feature experimentation and targeting, suitable for enterprises requiring robust feature management capabilities.
Community Support: FF4J has a vibrant community of developers contributing to its development and offering support through forums and documentation. In contrast, Optimizely Rollouts provides dedicated customer support and resources for users, ensuring timely assistance and guidance when needed.
Deployment Flexibility: FF4J offers flexibility in deployment options, supporting on-premise, cloud, or hybrid environments based on individual preferences and requirements. Optimizely Rollouts, while cloud-based, provides scalability and reliability for handling feature management at scale across different applications and projects.
Feature Experimentation Features: Optimizely Rollouts offers advanced feature experimentation capabilities, including A/B testing, feature targeting, and analytics, empowering teams to make data-driven decisions and optimize feature performance based on user feedback and behavior.

FF4J vs Optimizely Rollouts

Overview