FinalBuilder vs Jenkins X

Overview

FinalBuilder

Stacks10

Followers13

Votes0

Jenkins X

Stacks147

Followers370

Votes16

GitHub Stars4.7K

Forks800

FinalBuilder vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of continuous integration and delivery, FinalBuilder and Jenkins X are two popular automation tools that aid in the software development process. However, they have key differences that distinguish them from one another.

User Interface: FinalBuilder offers a visual user interface that allows users to create and customize build processes through a drag-and-drop interface, making it easy for non-technical users to define their build pipelines. On the other hand, Jenkins X primarily relies on command-line interfaces and configuration files, providing a more code-centric approach to defining pipeline configurations.
Scalability and Extendability: FinalBuilder is designed as a standalone tool primarily for Windows environments, limiting its scalability in larger and more complex development ecosystems. In contrast, Jenkins X is built on top of Jenkins and Kubernetes, providing a highly scalable and extensible platform that can adapt to the diverse needs of modern software development projects.
Community Support and Plugins: Jenkins X has a large and active community that continuously develops and maintains a vast array of plugins and integrations, allowing users to easily extend and customize their automation workflows. FinalBuilder, while offering some plugins and integrations, lacks the extensive plugin ecosystem and community support found in Jenkins X, limiting its flexibility for integrating with other tools and technologies.
Cloud-Native Capabilities: Jenkins X is specifically designed for cloud-native development, providing out-of-the-box support for Kubernetes, Docker, and various cloud providers. FinalBuilder, while capable of integrating with cloud services, may require more manual configuration and setup to achieve the same level of cloud-native capabilities provided by Jenkins X.
Native Pipeline Support: Jenkins X natively supports pipeline definitions as code, enabling teams to manage their build and deployment configurations alongside their application code using version control systems like Git. FinalBuilder, while supporting version control integration, may not offer the same level of seamless pipeline-as-code capabilities as Jenkins X, potentially leading to more fragmented and less collaborative development processes.
Deployment Workflow Automation: Jenkins X is specifically designed to automate the end-to-end deployment workflow, including automatic versioning, promotion between environments, and monitoring of application health. FinalBuilder, while capable of automating various stages of the build process, may require more manual intervention and external tools to achieve the same level of automated deployment workflow as Jenkins X.

In Summary, FinalBuilder emphasizes visual build process design and integration flexibility, while Jenkins X focuses on scalability, cloud-native capabilities, and end-to-end deployment automation in a code-centric environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on FinalBuilder, Jenkins X

Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

Fast SBT builds (caching)
Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
Everything as code

Ease of use

181k views181k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

FinalBuilder	Jenkins X
With FinalBuilder you don't need to edit xml, or write scripts. Visually define and debug your build scripts, then schedule them with windows scheduler, or integrate them with Continua CI, Jenkins or any other CI Server.	Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes
Graphical Interface; Scheduled Builds; Flow Control	Automated CI and CD - Rather than having to have deep knowledge of the internals of Jenkins Pipeline, Jenkins X will default awesome pipelines for your projects that implements fully CI and CD; Environment Promotion via GitOps - Each team gets a set of Environments. Jenkins X then automates the management of the Environments and the Promotion of new versions of Applications between Environments via GitOps; Pull Request Preview Environments - Jenkins X automatically spins up Preview Environments for your Pull Requests so you can get fast feedback before changes are merged to master; Feedback on Issues and Pull Requests - Jenkins X automatically comments on your Commits, Issues and Pull Requests with feedback as code is ready to be previewed, is promoted to environments or if Pull Requests are generated automatically to upgrade versions
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 800
Stacks 10	Stacks 147
Followers 13	Followers 370
Votes 0	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
Cons 1 No way to undo actions in the editor 1 Hard to solve merge conflicts	Pros 7 Kubernetes integration 5 Scripted Pipelines 4 GitOps Cons 1 Complexity
Integrations
Jenkins Windows	Kubernetes macOS Linux Mint Ubuntu Debian Fedora

What are some alternatives to FinalBuilder, Jenkins X?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

FinalBuilder vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

User Interface: FinalBuilder offers a visual user interface that allows users to create and customize build processes through a drag-and-drop interface, making it easy for non-technical users to define their build pipelines. On the other hand, Jenkins X primarily relies on command-line interfaces and configuration files, providing a more code-centric approach to defining pipeline configurations.
Scalability and Extendability: FinalBuilder is designed as a standalone tool primarily for Windows environments, limiting its scalability in larger and more complex development ecosystems. In contrast, Jenkins X is built on top of Jenkins and Kubernetes, providing a highly scalable and extensible platform that can adapt to the diverse needs of modern software development projects.
Community Support and Plugins: Jenkins X has a large and active community that continuously develops and maintains a vast array of plugins and integrations, allowing users to easily extend and customize their automation workflows. FinalBuilder, while offering some plugins and integrations, lacks the extensive plugin ecosystem and community support found in Jenkins X, limiting its flexibility for integrating with other tools and technologies.
Cloud-Native Capabilities: Jenkins X is specifically designed for cloud-native development, providing out-of-the-box support for Kubernetes, Docker, and various cloud providers. FinalBuilder, while capable of integrating with cloud services, may require more manual configuration and setup to achieve the same level of cloud-native capabilities provided by Jenkins X.
Native Pipeline Support: Jenkins X natively supports pipeline definitions as code, enabling teams to manage their build and deployment configurations alongside their application code using version control systems like Git. FinalBuilder, while supporting version control integration, may not offer the same level of seamless pipeline-as-code capabilities as Jenkins X, potentially leading to more fragmented and less collaborative development processes.
Deployment Workflow Automation: Jenkins X is specifically designed to automate the end-to-end deployment workflow, including automatic versioning, promotion between environments, and monitoring of application health. FinalBuilder, while capable of automating various stages of the build process, may require more manual intervention and external tools to achieve the same level of automated deployment workflow as Jenkins X.

FinalBuilder vs Jenkins X

Overview