StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Firebase vs Hasura

Firebase vs Hasura

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Firebase
Firebase
Stacks42.5K
Followers36.0K
Votes2.0K
Hasura
Hasura
Stacks343
Followers634
Votes144
GitHub Stars31.8K
Forks2.8K

Firebase vs Hasura: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Firebase and Hasura are both popular backend as a service (BaaS) platforms that offer various features for building and managing applications. However, they differ in several key aspects, making them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Real-time Database vs Instant GraphQL API: Firebase provides a real-time database that synchronizes data across all devices in real time, making it ideal for applications that require instant updates. On the other hand, Hasura offers an instant GraphQL API that simplifies data fetching and manipulation, making it easier to work with complex data structures and queries.

  2. Authentication Methods: Firebase offers built-in authentication methods such as email/password, Google, Facebook, etc., making it convenient for developers to implement user authentication. In contrast, Hasura relies on external services like Auth0 or Firebase Authentication for user authentication, providing more flexibility but requiring additional setup.

  3. Serverless Functions: Firebase allows developers to write serverless functions using Cloud Functions, enabling them to run custom backend code without managing servers. Hasura, on the other hand, does not provide serverless functions out-of-the-box, which may require developers to set up a separate serverless platform for custom backend logic.

  4. Real-time Subscription Support: Firebase supports real-time data synchronization through its real-time database, enabling developers to subscribe to changes in data. Hasura, on the other hand, offers real-time subscription support through GraphQL subscriptions, allowing developers to receive real-time updates when specific events occur.

  5. Data Storage and Querying: Firebase provides a NoSQL database for storing data, which may be more suitable for applications with flexible data structures. In contrast, Hasura uses PostgreSQL as its database, offering powerful relational querying capabilities that are beneficial for applications with complex data relationships.

  6. Deployment and Scaling: Firebase provides built-in solutions for deployment and scaling, making it easier for developers to deploy their applications globally and handle increased traffic. Hasura, on the other hand, may require more manual configuration and setup for deployment and scaling, especially for larger applications with high performance requirements.

In Summary, Firebase offers a real-time database, built-in authentication, and serverless functions, while Hasura provides an instant GraphQL API, real-time subscriptions, and powerful relational querying capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Firebase, Hasura

Jared
Jared

Contractor at Insight Global

Aug 9, 2019

ReviewonFirebaseFirebase

I started using Firebase over 5 years ago because of the 'real-time' nature. I originally used to use Real Time Database, but now I use Cloud Firestore. I recommend using the Google Firebase PaaS to quickly develop or prototype small to enterprise level web/mobile applications. Since Google purchased Firebase, it has exploded and it growing rapidly. I also find some level of comfort that it is Backed by Google.

272k views272k
Comments
Noam
Noam

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsExpressJSExpressJSReactReact

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

1.15M views1.15M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Firebase
Firebase
Hasura
Hasura

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Add the Firebase library to your app and get access to a shared data structure. Any changes made to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.;Firebase apps can be written entirely with client-side code, update in real-time out-of-the-box, interoperate well with existing services, scale automatically, and provide strong data security.;Data Accessibility- Data is stored as JSON in Firebase. Every piece of data has its own URL which can be used in Firebase's client libraries and as a REST endpoint. These URLs can also be entered into a browser to view the data and watch it update in real-time.;Real-time Synchronization- Firebase takes a new approach to the way data is moved around an app. Rather than using a traditional request & response model, it works by synchronizing data between devices. Whenever your data changes, all clients are immediately notified within milliseconds. The synchronized data is also persisted, allowing new clients to be immediately updated.;First-class Data Security- Traditional applications intermix security code with application code, whereas Firebase treats security as a first-class feature. You define your security policies in one place using a flexible rules language, and Firebase ensures that they are consistently enforced across all parts of your application. Having all your security logic in one place allows for easy auditing and helps you avoid security mistakes. The safety and security of your data is our top priority.;Automatic Scaling- The Firebase API is built from the ground up for performance and scale. Whenever your data changes, Firebase calculates the minimum set of updates required to keep all your clients in sync. In addition, all Firebase API functions are designed to scale linearly with the size of the data being synchronized. More importantly, Firebase handles all of the scaling and operations for you. Your app will scale from its first user to its first million without any code changes.;Servers are Optional- Firebase can provide all of the data storage, control, and transmission needs of most apps. In many cases, Firebase can completely replace your server and server-side code. This means you no longer need to build complicated backend software and can instead focus on your application logic and your customers.
Stack-agnostic; Cloud-agnostic; Git push to deploy; Pre-configured API Gateway; Instant GraphQL or JSON APIs; Out-of-the-box Auth APIs with UI Kits; Filestore APIs with access control; Deploy custom code
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
31.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.8K
Stacks
42.5K
Stacks
343
Followers
36.0K
Followers
634
Votes
2.0K
Votes
144
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
Cons
  • 31
    Can become expensive
  • 16
    No open source, you depend on external company
  • 15
    Scalability is not infinite
  • 9
    Not Flexible Enough
  • 7
    Cant filter queries
Pros
  • 23
    Fast
  • 18
    Easy GraphQL subscriptions
  • 16
    Easy setup of relationships and permissions
  • 15
    Automatically generates your GraphQL schema
  • 15
    Minimal learning curve
Cons
  • 3
    Cumbersome validations
Integrations
Trigger.io
Trigger.io
Famo.us
Famo.us
Backbone.js
Backbone.js
Ember.js
Ember.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Docker
Docker
GraphQL
GraphQL

What are some alternatives to Firebase, Hasura?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase