Firebase vs Hasura: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Firebase and Hasura are both popular backend as a service (BaaS) platforms that offer various features for building and managing applications. However, they differ in several key aspects, making them suitable for different use cases.

1. Real-time Database vs Instant GraphQL API: Firebase provides a real-time database that synchronizes data across all devices in real time, making it ideal for applications that require instant updates. On the other hand, Hasura offers an instant GraphQL API that simplifies data fetching and manipulation, making it easier to work with complex data structures and queries.

2. Authentication Methods: Firebase offers built-in authentication methods such as email/password, Google, Facebook, etc., making it convenient for developers to implement user authentication. In contrast, Hasura relies on external services like Auth0 or Firebase Authentication for user authentication, providing more flexibility but requiring additional setup.

3. Serverless Functions: Firebase allows developers to write serverless functions using Cloud Functions, enabling them to run custom backend code without managing servers. Hasura, on the other hand, does not provide serverless functions out-of-the-box, which may require developers to set up a separate serverless platform for custom backend logic.

4. Real-time Subscription Support: Firebase supports real-time data synchronization through its real-time database, enabling developers to subscribe to changes in data. Hasura, on the other hand, offers real-time subscription support through GraphQL subscriptions, allowing developers to receive real-time updates when specific events occur.

5. Data Storage and Querying: Firebase provides a NoSQL database for storing data, which may be more suitable for applications with flexible data structures. In contrast, Hasura uses PostgreSQL as its database, offering powerful relational querying capabilities that are beneficial for applications with complex data relationships.

6. Deployment and Scaling: Firebase provides built-in solutions for deployment and scaling, making it easier for developers to deploy their applications globally and handle increased traffic. Hasura, on the other hand, may require more manual configuration and setup for deployment and scaling, especially for larger applications with high performance requirements.

In Summary, Firebase offers a real-time database, built-in authentication, and serverless functions, while Hasura provides an instant GraphQL API, real-time subscriptions, and powerful relational querying capabilities.