Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Flask vs Nameko: What are the differences?
Routing and Web Framework: One key difference between Flask and Nameko is that Flask is a micro web framework primarily used for web development, while Nameko is a microservices framework used for building microservices. Flask is designed to handle HTTP requests and responses, allowing developers to create web applications, APIs, and more. On the other hand, Nameko focuses on distributed systems and communication between microservices through messaging.
Programming Paradigm: Another important difference is in the programming paradigm used by each framework. Flask follows a traditional synchronous programming model, where requests are handled sequentially, and the server waits for each request to be processed before moving on to the next. In contrast, Nameko is built on top of an event-driven architecture, implementing microservices as independent, asynchronous components that communicate through events.
Complexity and Scalability: Flask is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a great choice for small to medium-sized web applications. However, when it comes to larger and more complex projects that require scalability, Nameko's support for distributed systems and microservices architecture shines. Nameko provides tools and patterns that enable developers to build scalable systems that can handle high loads and complex interactions between services.
Community and Ecosystem: Flask has a large and active community of developers and contributors, supported by a wide range of extensions and libraries that enhance its functionality. Nameko, being a more specialized framework, has a smaller community but is dedicated to the world of microservices and distributed systems. Developers working on microservices architectures may find Nameko to be a better fit due to its specific focus and support for building resilient, distributed systems.
Error Handling and Fault Tolerance: In terms of error handling and fault tolerance, Nameko provides built-in support for handling failures and recovering from errors in distributed systems. It offers mechanisms for retrying failed operations, managing timeouts, and implementing circuit breakers to prevent cascading failures. Flask, while capable of handling errors, may require additional plugins or custom implementations to achieve the same level of fault tolerance in distributed environments.
Integration with External Systems: Nameko offers seamless integration with message brokers like RabbitMQ, allowing for easy communication between microservices through events and messaging. On the other hand, Flask can also integrate with message brokers and external systems, but its primary focus is on handling HTTP requests and responses for web applications. When it comes to building complex distributed systems with multiple interconnected services, Nameko's integration capabilities and messaging support make it a preferred choice.
In Summary, Flask and Nameko differ in their primary focuses on web development and microservices, programming paradigms, scalability and complexity, community support, fault tolerance mechanisms, and integration capabilities with external systems.
My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.
Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?
If you want to be a Web developer with knowledge in another frontend and NoSql technology, maybe continue with Flask. However, if you want to create very fast solutions to grow up with a new business and merge these with data analysis and other tools, Django is the answer. Basically read more about the service architecture where you feel more comfortable, Microservice or Monolithic, but please will not married with any because they solve issues to different contexts.
Which is the best Python framework for microservices?
We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.
Bottle is much less bloated and fast. Its built-in templating system is one of the fastest as it compiles the templates in bytecode. Also Bottle has no depenencies, preventing dependency bloat.
I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.
I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?
Here are some features I am looking for:
Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.
Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.
Support for swagger/ OpenAPI
Support for JSON Web Token
Support for test case coverage report
Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.
For starters flask provides a beautiful and easy way to create REST APIs. Also its supported by excellent beginner docs as well as a very active community. Another good thing with Flask is its widely available list of plugins which allow you to build as you go. Its also good in performance and can scale to a quite decent level. However, if you are sure your project is going to be fairly big, it would be better to start with Django as it provides a lot of features out of the box and is extremely stable in performance. Both these frameworks have support for Swagger, JWT, Coverage Report although you have to install plugins for them. Deploying both of these are fairly simple and there is huge documentation available. Django has one of the best documentations I have come across. I hope I was able to answer your queries.
Pros of Flask
- For it flexibility10
- Flexibilty and easy to use9
- Flask8
- User friendly7
- Secured6
- Unopinionated5
- Secure2
- Customizable1
- Simple to use1
- Powerful1
- Rapid development1
- Beautiful code1
- Easy to develop and maintain applications1
- Easy to setup and get it going1
- Easy to use1
- Documentation1
- Python1
- Minimal1
- Lightweight1
- Easy to get started1
- Orm1
- Not JS1
- Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.1
- Easy to integrate1
- Speed1
- Get started quickly1
- Open source0
- Well designed0
- Flexibilty0
- Productive0
- Awesome0
- Expressive0
- Love it0
Pros of Nameko
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Flask
- Not JS10
- Context7
- Not fast5
- Don't has many module as in spring1
Cons of Nameko
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Flask?
What is Nameko?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Nameko?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+17
+47+46+39