Alternatives to Flask logo

Alternatives to Flask

Django, Tornado, ExpressJS, Node.js, and React are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Flask.
14.2K
11.9K
+ 1
1.5K

What is Flask and what are its top alternatives?

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.
Flask is a tool in the Microframeworks (Backend) category of a tech stack.
Flask is an open source tool with 57.3K GitHub stars and 14.7K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Flask's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Flask

  • Django

    Django

    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. ...

  • Tornado

    Tornado

    By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user. ...

  • ExpressJS

    ExpressJS

    Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications. ...

  • Node.js

    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • React

    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • Bottle

    Bottle

    It is distributed as a single file module and has no dependencies other than the Python Standard Library. It has fast and pythonic built-in template engine and support for mako, jinja2 and cheetah templates. ...

  • Spring Boot

    Spring Boot

    Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration. ...

  • Django REST framework

    Django REST framework

    It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Flask alternatives & related posts

Django logo

Django

26.7K
23.6K
3.8K
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
26.7K
23.6K
+ 1
3.8K
PROS OF DJANGO
  • 634
    Rapid development
  • 468
    Open source
  • 401
    Great community
  • 353
    Easy to learn
  • 263
    Mvc
  • 215
    Beautiful code
  • 210
    Elegant
  • 193
    Free
  • 191
    Great packages
  • 178
    Great libraries
  • 68
    Restful
  • 65
    Comes with auth and crud admin panel
  • 65
    Powerful
  • 60
    Great documentation
  • 58
    Great for web
  • 44
    Python
  • 37
    Great orm
  • 34
    Great for api
  • 27
    All included
  • 22
    Web Apps
  • 21
    Fast
  • 18
    Used by top startups
  • 16
    Clean
  • 15
    Easy setup
  • 15
    Sexy
  • 12
    Convention over configuration
  • 10
    ORM
  • 9
    The Django community
  • 9
    Allows for very rapid development with great libraries
  • 6
    Great MVC and templating engine
  • 6
    King of backend world
  • 6
    Its elegant and practical
  • 5
    Mvt
  • 5
    Batteries included
  • 5
    Full stack
  • 5
    Fast prototyping
  • 5
    Easy Structure , useful inbuilt library
  • 5
    Easy to develop end to end AI Models
  • 5
    Have not found anything that it can't do
  • 4
    Very quick to get something up and running
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Easy
  • 4
    Cross-Platform
  • 3
    Map
  • 3
    Great peformance
  • 3
    Scaffold
  • 3
    Just the right level of abstraction
  • 3
    Modular
  • 3
    Full-Text Search
  • 3
    Zero code burden to change databases
  • 3
    Python community
  • 3
    Many libraries
  • 2
    Easy to change database manager
  • 1
    Node js
CONS OF DJANGO
  • 25
    Underpowered templating
  • 19
    Underpowered ORM
  • 19
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
  • 7
    Admin
  • 7
    Not nodejs
  • 6
    Configuration hell
  • 4
    Not as clean and nice documentation like Laravel
  • 3
    Python
  • 3
    Not typed
  • 3
    Bloated admin panel included
  • 2
    Overwhelming folder structure
  • 1
    InEffective Multithreading

related Django posts

Dmitry Mukhin

Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It’s worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren’t running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we’d go with Ember.js.

However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

See more

Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

See more
Tornado logo

Tornado

317
368
165
A Python web framework and asynchronous networking library, originally developed at FriendFeed
317
368
+ 1
165
PROS OF TORNADO
  • 37
    Open source
  • 31
    So fast
  • 27
    Great for microservices architecture
  • 20
    Websockets
  • 17
    Simple
  • 13
    Asynchronous
  • 10
    Python
  • 7
    Lightweight
  • 3
    Handles well persistent connexions
CONS OF TORNADO
  • 2
    Event loop is complicated

related Tornado posts

Around the time of their Series A, Pinterest’s stack included Python and Django, with Tornado and Node.js as web servers. Memcached / Membase and Redis handled caching, with RabbitMQ handling queueing. Nginx, HAproxy and Varnish managed static-delivery and load-balancing, with persistent data storage handled by MySQL.

See more
ExpressJS logo

ExpressJS

21.1K
16K
1.5K
Sinatra inspired web development framework for node.js -- insanely fast, flexible, and simple
21.1K
16K
+ 1
1.5K
PROS OF EXPRESSJS
  • 367
    Simple
  • 322
    Node.js
  • 235
    Javascript
  • 185
    High performance
  • 148
    Robust routing
  • 66
    Middlewares
  • 66
    Open source
  • 53
    Great community
  • 34
    Hybrid web applications
  • 10
    Well documented
  • 8
    Sinatra inspired
  • 5
    Isomorphic js.. superfast and easy
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 2
    Socket connection
  • 2
    Npm
  • 2
    Event loop
  • 2
    Light weight
  • 2
    Resource available for learning
  • 2
    Xxx
  • 1
    Callbacks
  • 1
    Data stream
CONS OF EXPRESSJS
  • 23
    Not python
  • 16
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 6
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 2
    Easily Insecure for Novices
  • 1
    Not a lion
  • 1
    Nnnn

related ExpressJS posts

Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 25 upvotes · 2.1M views

Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
  • npm as package manager
  • NestJS as Node.js framework
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • ExpressJS as web server
  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
  • Postman as a tool for API development
  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
  • JSON Web Token for access token management

The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
See more

Repost

Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku . However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

See more
Node.js logo

Node.js

125.4K
103.9K
8.4K
A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
125.4K
103.9K
+ 1
8.4K
PROS OF NODE.JS
  • 1.4K
    Npm
  • 1.3K
    Javascript
  • 1.1K
    Great libraries
  • 1K
    High-performance
  • 795
    Open source
  • 484
    Great for apis
  • 474
    Asynchronous
  • 420
    Great community
  • 390
    Great for realtime apps
  • 295
    Great for command line utilities
  • 81
    Node Modules
  • 80
    Websockets
  • 67
    Uber Simple
  • 57
    Great modularity
  • 56
    Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
  • 40
    Easy to start
  • 35
    Great for Data Streaming
  • 31
    Realtime
  • 26
    Awesome
  • 24
    Non blocking IO
  • 17
    Can be used as a proxy
  • 16
    High performance, open source, scalable
  • 15
    Non-blocking and modular
  • 14
    Easy and Fun
  • 12
    Easy and powerful
  • 12
    Same lang as AngularJS
  • 11
    Future of BackEnd
  • 10
    Fast
  • 9
    Fullstack
  • 9
    Scalability
  • 9
    Cross platform
  • 8
    Simple
  • 7
    Mean Stack
  • 6
    Great for webapps
  • 6
    Easy concurrency
  • 5
    Friendly
  • 5
    Fast, simple code and async
  • 5
    React
  • 4
    Great speed
  • 4
    Fast development
  • 4
    Its amazingly fast and scalable
  • 4
    Control everything
  • 4
    Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
  • 4
    Typescript
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 3
    It's fast
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Isomorphic coolness
  • 2
    Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
  • 2
    Easy to learn
  • 2
    TypeScript Support
  • 2
    Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
  • 2
    One language, end-to-end
  • 2
    Javascript2
  • 2
    Not Python
  • 2
    Performant and fast prototyping
  • 2
    Blazing fast
  • 2
    Great community
  • 2
    Less boilerplate code
  • 2
    Easy
  • 1
    Lovely
  • 1
    Event Driven
CONS OF NODE.JS
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 42
    New framework every day
  • 35
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 29
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 23
    Callback
  • 16
    Javascript
  • 11
    Dependency based on GitHub
  • 10
    Dependency hell
  • 10
    Low computational power
  • 7
    Can block whole server easily
  • 6
    Very very Slow
  • 6
    Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
  • 3
    Unstable
  • 3
    Breaking updates
  • 3
    Unneeded over complication
  • 1
    No standard approach
  • 1
    Can't read server session
  • 1
    Bad transitive dependency management

related Node.js posts

Nick Rockwell
SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 44 upvotes · 1.7M views

When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

See more
Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 39 upvotes · 4.2M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
React logo

React

113.6K
91.2K
3.8K
A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
113.6K
91.2K
+ 1
3.8K
PROS OF REACT
  • 760
    Components
  • 652
    Virtual dom
  • 563
    Performance
  • 486
    Simplicity
  • 436
    Composable
  • 175
    Data flow
  • 159
    Declarative
  • 124
    Isn't an mvc framework
  • 113
    Reactive updates
  • 111
    Explicit app state
  • 32
    JSX
  • 23
    Learn once, write everywhere
  • 19
    Uni-directional data flow
  • 16
    Easy to Use
  • 14
    Works great with Flux Architecture
  • 10
    Great perfomance
  • 8
    Built by Facebook
  • 7
    Javascript
  • 5
    TypeScript support
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Feels like the 90s
  • 4
    Scalable
  • 4
    Easy to start
  • 4
    Awesome
  • 3
    Fancy third party tools
  • 3
    Hooks
  • 3
    Functional
  • 3
    Server side views
  • 3
    Props
  • 2
    Rich ecosystem
  • 2
    Obama
  • 2
    Very gentle learning curve
  • 2
    Has functional components
  • 2
    Simple
  • 2
    Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
  • 2
    Super easy
  • 2
    Has arrow functions
  • 2
    Strong Community
  • 2
    Great migration pathway for older systems
  • 2
    SSR
  • 2
    Fast evolving
  • 2
    Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
  • 2
    Excellent Documentation
  • 2
    Scales super well
  • 2
    Just the View of MVC
  • 2
    Server Side Rendering
  • 2
    Cross-platform
  • 1
    Fragments
  • 1
    Start simple
  • 1
    Every decision architecture wise makes sense
  • 1
    Permissively-licensed
  • 1
    Beautiful and Neat Component Management
  • 1
    Sdfsdfsdf
  • 1
    Allows creating single page applications
  • 1
    Split your UI into components with one true state
  • 1
    Sharable
CONS OF REACT
  • 35
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 23
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 21
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 8
    JSX
  • 7
    Not enterprise friendly
  • 4
    One-way binding only
  • 2
    State consistency with backend neglected
  • 2
    Bad Documentation

related React posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 1.6M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more
Adebayo Akinlaja
Engineering Manager at Andela · | 26 upvotes · 786.9K views

I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.

A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.

In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.

If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.

See more
Bottle logo

Bottle

40
47
5
A lightweight WSGI micro web-framework for Python
40
47
+ 1
5
PROS OF BOTTLE
  • 2
    Great documentation
  • 2
    Super easy to use
  • 1
    Faster
CONS OF BOTTLE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Bottle posts

    Spring Boot logo

    Spring Boot

    17.1K
    15.1K
    914
    Create Spring-powered, production-grade applications and services with absolute minimum fuss
    17.1K
    15.1K
    + 1
    914
    PROS OF SPRING BOOT
    • 135
      Powerful and handy
    • 127
      Easy setup
    • 118
      Java
    • 86
      Spring
    • 82
      Fast
    • 42
      Extensible
    • 34
      Lots of "off the shelf" functionalities
    • 29
      Cloud Solid
    • 23
      Caches well
    • 21
      Many receipes around for obscure features
    • 20
      Productive
    • 20
      Modular
    • 19
      Integrations with most other Java frameworks
    • 19
      Spring ecosystem is great
    • 18
      Fast Performance With Microservices
    • 17
      Auto-configuration
    • 16
      Community
    • 13
      Easy setup, Community Support, Solid for ERP apps
    • 13
      One-stop shop
    • 12
      Cross-platform
    • 12
      Easy to parallelize
    • 11
      Easy setup, good for build erp systems, well documented
    • 11
      Powerful 3rd party libraries and frameworks
    • 10
      Easy setup, Git Integration
    • 3
      It's so easier to start a project on spring
    • 3
      Kotlin
    CONS OF SPRING BOOT
    • 19
      Heavy weight
    • 17
      Annotation ceremony
    • 10
      Many config files needed
    • 8
      Java
    • 5
      Reactive
    • 4
      Excellent tools for cloud hosting, since 5.x

    related Spring Boot posts

    Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

    Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

    See more
    Praveen Mooli
    Engineering Manager at Taylor and Francis · | 14 upvotes · 2M views

    We are in the process of building a modern content platform to deliver our content through various channels. We decided to go with Microservices architecture as we wanted scale. Microservice architecture style is an approach to developing an application as a suite of small independently deployable services built around specific business capabilities. You can gain modularity, extensive parallelism and cost-effective scaling by deploying services across many distributed servers. Microservices modularity facilitates independent updates/deployments, and helps to avoid single point of failure, which can help prevent large-scale outages. We also decided to use Event Driven Architecture pattern which is a popular distributed asynchronous architecture pattern used to produce highly scalable applications. The event-driven architecture is made up of highly decoupled, single-purpose event processing components that asynchronously receive and process events.

    To build our #Backend capabilities we decided to use the following: 1. #Microservices - Java with Spring Boot , Node.js with ExpressJS and Python with Flask 2. #Eventsourcingframework - Amazon Kinesis , Amazon Kinesis Firehose , Amazon SNS , Amazon SQS, AWS Lambda 3. #Data - Amazon RDS , Amazon DynamoDB , Amazon S3 , MongoDB Atlas

    To build #Webapps we decided to use Angular 2 with RxJS

    #Devops - GitHub , Travis CI , Terraform , Docker , Serverless

    See more
    Django REST framework logo

    Django REST framework

    1.6K
    1.7K
    301
    Web APIs for Django
    1.6K
    1.7K
    + 1
    301
    PROS OF DJANGO REST FRAMEWORK
    • 64
      Browsable api
    • 64
      Easy to use
    • 53
      Great documentation
    • 49
      Customizable
    • 41
      Fast development
    • 9
      Easy to use, customizable, pluggable, serializer
    • 8
      Python
    • 5
      Django ORM
    • 4
      FastSerialize
    • 2
      Less code
    • 2
      Easy implementation
    • 0
      Dsasda
    CONS OF DJANGO REST FRAMEWORK
    • 2
      Bad documentation
    • 2
      Reimplements Django functionality
    • 1
      No support for URL Namespaces
    • 0
      Bad CSRF handling

    related Django REST framework posts

    Tim Abbott

    Zulip has been powered by Django since the very early days of its development with Django 1.4, back in 2012. As a reasonably mature web application with significant scale, we're at the stage in many companies' development where one starts to rip out more and more of the web framework to optimize things or just make them work the way we want. (E.g. while I was at Dropbox in early 2016, we discovered we only had about 600 lines of code left from the original Pylons framework that actually ran).

    One of the things that has been really fantastic about Django is that we're still happily using it for the vast majority of code in the project, and every time Django comes out with a new release, I read the changelog and get excited about several improvements that actually make my life better. While Django has made some design decisions that I don't agree with (e.g. I'm not a fan of Django REST framework, and think it makes life more difficult), Django also makes it easy to do your own thing, which we've done to great effect (see the linked article for details on our has_request_variables framework).

    Overall I think we've gotten a ton of value out of Python and Django and would recommend it to anyone starting a new full-featured web application project today.

    See more

    Hi

    I’ve been using Django for the last year on and off to do my backend API. I’m getting a bit frustrated with the Django REST framework with the setup of the serializers and Django for the lack of web sockets. I’m considering either Spring or .NET Core. I’m familiar with Kotlin and C# but I’ve not built any substantial projects with them. I like OOP, building a desktop app, web API, and also the potential to get a job in the future or building a tool at work to manage my documents, dashboard and processes point cloud data.

    I’m familiar with c/cpp, TypeScript.

    I would love your insights on where I should go.

    See more