Flask vs Rocket

Overview

Flask

Stacks19.3K

Followers16.2K

Votes60

Rocket

Stacks91

Followers176

Votes12

Flask vs Rocket: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Flask and Rocket are both popular web frameworks used for developing web applications in Python. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that differentiate them.

Routing: In Flask, routes are defined using decorators, making it easy to map URLs to functions. On the other hand, Rocket uses macros to define routes, allowing for more flexibility and customizability in routing.
Async Support: Flask traditionally does not support asynchronous programming out of the box, whereas Rocket fully embraces asynchronous programming, allowing developers to take advantage of features like async/await for improved performance.
Request Handling: Flask provides a Request object to access request data, while Rocket uses custom data types to handle requests, providing a more customized approach to request handling.
Template Engines: Flask typically uses Jinja2 as its default template engine, allowing for easy template inheritance and dynamic content generation. Rocket, on the other hand, provides support for multiple template engines, giving developers more options to choose from.
Dependency Injection: Flask does not have built-in support for dependency injection, making it less suitable for complex applications that require managing dependencies. Rocket, on the other hand, provides built-in support for dependency injection, making it easier to manage and inject dependencies into components.
API Development: Flask is commonly used for building RESTful APIs, with libraries like Flask-RESTful providing tools for easily creating API endpoints. Rocket, on the other hand, is more focused on web applications, providing features like form validation and request handling tailored for web development.

In Summary, Flask and Rocket have significant differences in routing, async support, request handling, template engines, dependency injection, and focus on API development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Flask, Rocket

Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceon

Django

Python

Flask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k

Comments

Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.
Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.
Support for swagger/ OpenAPI
Support for JSON Web Token
Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k

Comments

Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Python

Nameko

RabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask	Rocket
Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.	Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.
-	From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something; Boilerplate free; Easy to use; Extensible
Statistics
Stacks 19.3K	Stacks 91
Followers 16.2K	Followers 176
Votes 60	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 For it flexibility 9 Flexibilty and easy to use 7 User friendly 6 Secured 5 Unopinionated Cons 10 Not JS 7 Context 5 Not fast 1 Don't has many module as in spring	Pros 5 Easy to use 4 Uses all the rust features extensively 1 Provides nice abstractions 1 Inbuilt templating feature 1 Django analog in rust Cons 1 Only runs in nightly
Integrations
No integrations available	Rust

What are some alternatives to Flask, Rocket?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Flask vs Rocket: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Flask and Rocket are both popular web frameworks used for developing web applications in Python. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that differentiate them.

Routing: In Flask, routes are defined using decorators, making it easy to map URLs to functions. On the other hand, Rocket uses macros to define routes, allowing for more flexibility and customizability in routing.
Async Support: Flask traditionally does not support asynchronous programming out of the box, whereas Rocket fully embraces asynchronous programming, allowing developers to take advantage of features like async/await for improved performance.
Request Handling: Flask provides a Request object to access request data, while Rocket uses custom data types to handle requests, providing a more customized approach to request handling.
Template Engines: Flask typically uses Jinja2 as its default template engine, allowing for easy template inheritance and dynamic content generation. Rocket, on the other hand, provides support for multiple template engines, giving developers more options to choose from.
Dependency Injection: Flask does not have built-in support for dependency injection, making it less suitable for complex applications that require managing dependencies. Rocket, on the other hand, provides built-in support for dependency injection, making it easier to manage and inject dependencies into components.
API Development: Flask is commonly used for building RESTful APIs, with libraries like Flask-RESTful providing tools for easily creating API endpoints. Rocket, on the other hand, is more focused on web applications, providing features like form validation and request handling tailored for web development.

In Summary, Flask and Rocket have significant differences in routing, async support, request handling, template engines, dependency injection, and focus on API development.