Fluxible vs Re-base: What are the differences?
Developers describe Fluxible as "A pluggable container for universal flux applications, by Yahoo". Pluggable, singleton-free container for isomorphic Flux applications. On the other hand, Re-base is detailed as "A Relay inspired library for building React.js + Firebase applications". React.js makes managing state easy to reason about. Firebase makes persisting your data easy to implement. re-base, inspired by Relay, combines the benefits of React and Firebase by allowing each component to specify its own data dependency. Forget about your data persistence and focus on what really matters, your application's state.
Some of the features offered by Fluxible are:
- Singleton-free for server rendering
- Store dehydration for client bootstrapping
- Stateless async actions
On the other hand, Re-base provides the following key features:
- syncState: Two way data binding between any property on your component's state and any endpoint in Firebase. Use the same API you're used to to update your component's state (setState), and Firebase will also update.
- bindToState: One way data binding. Whenever your Firebase endpoint changes, the property on your state will update as well.
- listenTo: Whenever your Firebase endpoint changes, it will invoke a callback passing it the new data from Firebase.
Fluxible and Re-base are both open source tools. It seems that Re-base with 2.13K GitHub stars and 162 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Fluxible with 1.82K GitHub stars and 230 GitHub forks.