StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. State Management Library
  5. Fluxible vs Redux.js

Fluxible vs Redux.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redux
Redux
Stacks32.0K
Followers23.6K
Votes674
Fluxible
Fluxible
Stacks12
Followers13
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.8K
Forks224

Fluxible vs Redux.js: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Fluxible and Redux.js, both popular choices for managing state in JavaScript applications.

  1. Architecture: Fluxible is built on the Flux architecture, which consists of actions, dispatchers, stores, and views. Redux, on the other hand, is based on the Redux architecture, where there is a single store with reducers to manage state changes. This difference in architecture can impact how developers structure their applications and manage state.

  2. Middleware: Redux has a robust ecosystem for middleware, allowing developers to extend its capabilities with middleware like thunk, saga, or logger. On the contrary, Fluxible does not have as extensive a range of middleware options available, limiting the flexibility in handling side effects and complex async actions within the application.

  3. Immutability: Redux promotes the principle of immutable state by immutably updating the state tree with every action. This ensures predictability of state changes and helps in efficient state management. Fluxible, on the other hand, doesn't enforce immutability out of the box, leaving it up to the developer to handle state mutations carefully.

  4. Tooling and DevTools: Redux comes with powerful developer tools like Redux DevTools, which provide insights into state changes, actions, and performance optimizations. These tools make it easier to debug and track application state. Fluxible, although it has tools for debugging, might not offer the same level of sophistication and ease of use provided by Redux DevTools.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Redux has a larger and more active community compared to Fluxible, which translates into more resources, tutorials, plugins, and support available for developers using Redux. The vast ecosystem of Redux can be advantageous when seeking help, integrating with other libraries, or finding solutions to common problems.

In Summary, Redux and Fluxible differ in architecture, middleware options, immutability enforcement, developer tools, and community support, influencing how developers manage state in JavaScript applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Redux
Redux
Fluxible
Fluxible

It helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. t provides a great experience, such as live code editing combined with a time traveling debugger.

Pluggable, singleton-free container for isomorphic Flux applications.

Predictable state; Easy testing; Works with other view layers besides React
Singleton-free for server rendering;Store dehydration for client bootstrapping;Stateless async actions;Higher order components for easy integration;Enforcement of Flux flow - restricted access to the Flux interface from within components;Pluggable - add your own interfaces to the Flux context;Updated for React 0.13
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
224
Stacks
32.0K
Stacks
12
Followers
23.6K
Followers
13
Votes
674
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 191
    State is predictable
  • 150
    Plays well with React and others
  • 126
    State stored in a single object tree
  • 79
    Hot reloading out of the box
  • 74
    Allows for time travel
Cons
  • 13
    Lots of boilerplate
  • 6
    Verbose
  • 5
    Steep learning curve
  • 5
    Design
  • 4
    Steeper learning curve than MobX
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
React
React

What are some alternatives to Redux, Fluxible?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

MobX

MobX

MobX is a battle tested library that makes state management simple and scalable by transparently applying functional reactive programming (TFRP). React and MobX together are a powerful combination. React renders the application state by providing mechanisms to translate it into a tree of renderable components. MobX provides the mechanism to store and update the application state that React then uses.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase