Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Flynn

14
48
+ 1
16
tsuru

14
42
+ 1
33
Add tool

Flynn vs tsuru: What are the differences?

What is Flynn? Next generation open source platform as a service. Flynn lets you deploy apps with git push and containers. Developers can deploy any app to any cluster in seconds.

What is tsuru? Extensible and open source Platform as a Service software. tsuru is an open source polyglot cloud application platform (PaaS). With tsuru, you don’t need to think about servers at all. You can write apps in the programming language of your choice, back it with add-on resources such as SQL and NoSQL databases, memcached, redis, and many others. You manage your app using the tsuru command-line tool and you deploy code using the Git revision control system, all running on the tsuru infrastructure.

Flynn and tsuru belong to "Platform as a Service" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Flynn are:

  • Flynn goes beyond 12 factor apps. Run any Linux process written in any language or framework, even stateful apps on your own servers or any public cloud.
  • Scaling or adding a new cluster is simple: just add more nodes. Everything is containerized, Flynn takes care of distributing work across the cluster.
  • Flynn is 100% free and open source. Flynn works great out of the box, and since Flynn is modular and API-driven it's easy to modify and swap components to suit your needs.

On the other hand, tsuru provides the following key features:

  • Fast and secure. The entire process is really simple with no special tools needed, just a simple git push.
  • Scaling in Tsuru is completely painless. Just add a unit and Tsuru will take care of everything else.
  • Tsuru is built to be extensible. Through services you can provide anything your application needs.

"Free" is the primary reason why developers consider Flynn over the competitors, whereas "Very receptive to contributions" was stated as the key factor in picking tsuru.

Flynn and tsuru are both open source tools. Flynn with 7.21K GitHub stars and 531 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than tsuru with 3.13K GitHub stars and 421 GitHub forks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Flynn
Pros of tsuru
  • 6
    Free
  • 5
    Supports few types of containers:libvirt-lxc, docker
  • 2
    PostgreSQL HA
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    12-factor methodology
  • 5
    Very receptive to contributions
  • 5
    Ready for production with docker since 2013
  • 5
    Supports sites with millions of users at globo.com
  • 4
    Tsuru improved our time to market and Devs happiness
  • 4
    Truly opensource - no comercial version
  • 3
    Free
  • 3
    Very easy to try - just one command line
  • 2
    Multi orchestrator
  • 1
    Java platform
  • 1
    Easy to use

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Flynn?

Flynn lets you deploy apps with git push and containers. Developers can deploy any app to any cluster in seconds.

What is tsuru?

tsuru is an open source polyglot cloud application platform (PaaS). With tsuru, you don’t need to think about servers at all. You can write apps in the programming language of your choice, back it with add-on resources such as SQL and NoSQL databases, memcached, redis, and many others. You manage your app using the tsuru command-line tool and you deploy code using the Git revision control system, all running on the tsuru infrastructure.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Flynn?
What companies use tsuru?
See which teams inside your own company are using Flynn or tsuru.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Flynn?
What tools integrate with tsuru?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Flynn and tsuru?
Deis
Deis can deploy any application or service that can run inside a Docker container. In order to be scaled horizontally, applications must follow Heroku's 12-factor methodology and store state in external backing services.
Kubernetes
Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
Dokku
It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.
Heroku
Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
Google App Engine
Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.
See all alternatives