Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Gatling

250
319
+ 1
21
Loader.io

73
173
+ 1
18
Add tool

Gatling vs Loader.io: What are the differences?

Introduction

Gatling and Loader.io are both popular tools used for performance testing applications. However, there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Protocol Support: Gatling has strong support for HTTP protocol and can also handle WebSocket and Server-Sent Events. On the other hand, Loader.io focuses mainly on HTTP and HTTPS protocols, making it more suitable for testing web applications with these protocols.

  2. Scalability: Gatling is more suited for testing complex scenarios and high loads on a single machine due to its intensive CPU utilization. In contrast, Loader.io provides on-demand cloud-based load testing capabilities, allowing for easy scalability by provisioning more virtual users.

  3. Real-Time Monitoring: Loader.io offers real-time monitoring and detailed analytics during the test execution, which can help in understanding the performance of the application under load. Gatling, on the other hand, requires additional integration with monitoring tools for similar real-time insights.

  4. Ease of Use: Loader.io provides a user-friendly interface for creating and managing load tests without the need for scripting or programming knowledge, making it ideal for beginners. Gatling, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve due to its scripting-based test scenarios.

  5. Cost: Gatling is open-source software, making it a cost-effective option for performance testing. Loader.io, being a cloud-based service, comes with a pricing model based on the number of virtual users and test duration, which may incur costs based on the test requirements.

In Summary, Gatling and Loader.io differ in protocol support, scalability, real-time monitoring, ease of use, and cost, catering to different needs in performance testing.

Advice on Gatling and Loader.io
Ratan Sharmacharya
Needs advice
on
Apache JMeterApache JMeter
and
Loader.ioLoader.io

I have a team that is not heavy on programming skills. I am looking for a load testing tool that is easy to use. Preferably, the tool should be a record and playback tool without much programming. Also, the tool should be able to test APIs apart from web-based applications. What tool should I opt for?

See more
Replies (2)
Deepak Naik
Product Owner at Digite Infotech Private Limited · | 3 upvotes · 35.5K views

My choice would be Apache JMeter, It's free and opensource plus it comes with lots of plugins and extendability. Apache JMeter needs a small amount of a learning curve and a basic understanding of Network, Protocols (TCP/IP ports, HTTP(S) and REST/SOAP, etc.) for initial setup. But it doesn't require programming skills. it has a nice record and playback option. You can still carry on without the developer skillset if you follow these steps. 1. Take backup. 2. Start recording and interact with the application. 3. stop recording and save the test case. This will give you your test-bed, after this, after these steps, every time just do Restore from backup and then Playback and observer results.

If you have longer recordings then an understanding of how to modify the recorded scripts will come handy.

For some of the advanced features such as Configuring variables, implementing loops, throttling adding think time, and automating test scaling to the number of users will require good planning of test scenarios and a Developer experience but this is true for any tool (even loader.io)

See more
Pepe Ruiz
Head of Content at k6.io · | 2 upvotes · 35K views
Recommends
on
k6k6

Disclaimer: I work at k6, and I recommend you try our tool.

It might require some coding skills, but we support a few options to record a user session to autogenerate the load test. Read How to record a browser session with k6 OSS.

The k6 Cloud also supports recording a user session with a Browser Extension. Additionally, it provides a Test Builder UI to generate a load test for testing APIs.

If you have questions or need help, you can ask on Slack and the Community forum.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Gatling
Pros of Loader.io
  • 6
    Great detailed reports
  • 5
    Can run in cluster mode
  • 5
    Loadrunner
  • 3
    Scala based
  • 2
    Load test as code
  • 0
    Faster
  • 9
    Easy to use
  • 6
    Free tier
  • 3
    Heroku add-on

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Gatling
Cons of Loader.io
  • 2
    Steep Learning Curve
  • 1
    Hard to test non-supported protocols
  • 0
    Not distributed
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Gatling?

    Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

    What is Loader.io?

    Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Gatling?
    What companies use Loader.io?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Gatling?
    What tools integrate with Loader.io?
    What are some alternatives to Gatling and Loader.io?
    Selenium
    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
    BlazeMeter
    Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>
    Locust
    Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.
    k6
    It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.
    Cucumber
    Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.
    See all alternatives