StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Static Site Generators
  5. Gatsby vs Gatsby Cloud

Gatsby vs Gatsby Cloud

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gatsby
Gatsby
Stacks3.3K
Followers2.4K
Votes121
GitHub Stars55.9K
Forks10.3K
Gatsby Cloud
Gatsby Cloud
Stacks76
Followers97
Votes1

Gatsby vs Gatsby Cloud: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Gatsby and Gatsby Cloud are both popular tools used for building and deploying websites. While Gatsby serves as a static site generator, Gatsby Cloud offers a platform for hosting and managing Gatsby projects. Understanding the key differences between the two can help in choosing the right solution for a project.

1. **Deployment:** Gatsby Cloud provides seamless deployment of Gatsby sites with features like instant builds, incremental builds, and deployment previews, making the process efficient and convenient. On the other hand, Gatsby, as a static site generator, requires external hosting solutions for deployment.

2. **Performance Monitoring:** Gatsby Cloud offers real-time performance monitoring and analytics for Gatsby sites, allowing users to track metrics like page speed, Lighthouse scores, and more to optimize website performance. Gatsby itself does not offer built-in performance monitoring tools.

3. **Cloud Integration:** Gatsby Cloud integrates seamlessly with cloud services like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure, enabling users to leverage the power of these platforms for scalability, security, and other advanced features. Gatsby, as a static site generator, does not come with built-in cloud integrations.

4. **Collaboration Tools:** Gatsby Cloud provides collaboration tools like live editing, team management, and content review workflows, making it easier for teams to work together on Gatsby projects. Gatsby, in its standalone form, does not offer these collaborative features.

5. **Automatic Updates:** Gatsby Cloud automatically updates Gatsby sites with the latest security patches, improvements, and Gatsby platform updates, ensuring that sites are always up to date and secure. With Gatsby alone, users need to manually update their sites to incorporate the latest enhancements.

6. **Support and SLA:** Gatsby Cloud offers dedicated support, service-level agreements (SLA), and priority assistance for its users, ensuring prompt resolution of issues and reliable service. Gatsby, as an open-source tool, relies on community support and may not provide the same level of dedicated assistance as Gatsby Cloud.

In Summary, Gatsby Cloud offers advanced deployment, performance monitoring, cloud integration, collaboration tools, automatic updates, and dedicated support, setting it apart from the standalone Gatsby static site generator.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Gatsby, Gatsby Cloud

Manuel
Manuel

Frontend Engineer at BI X

Jul 22, 2020

Decided

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

178k views178k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gatsby
Gatsby
Gatsby Cloud
Gatsby Cloud

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

It is the perfect cloud complement for Gatsby and provide a lot of cloud services Gatsby users need like real-time preview and very fast builds.

-
Real-time Preview: View live content updates from your headless CMS; Blazing fast Gatsby builds in the cloud (in beta); Performance reports; Free tier for small sites
Statistics
GitHub Stars
55.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
10.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.3K
Stacks
76
Followers
2.4K
Followers
97
Votes
121
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    Generated websites are super fast
  • 16
    Fast
  • 15
    GraphQL
  • 10
    Progressive Web Apps generation
  • 9
    Easy to connect with lots of CMS via official plugins
Cons
  • 7
    No ssr
  • 4
    Documentation isn't complete.
  • 3
    Very slow builds
  • 2
    Flash of unstyled content issues
  • 2
    For-profit
Pros
  • 1
    Able to have multiple sites for multiple clients.
Integrations
WordPress
WordPress
TypeScript
TypeScript
GraphCMS
GraphCMS
Babel
Babel
prismic.io
prismic.io
AWS Amplify
AWS Amplify
Glamorous
Glamorous
Prisma
Prisma
styled-components
styled-components
Emotion
Emotion
Contentful
Contentful
Drupal
Drupal
GitHub
GitHub
Cosmic JS
Cosmic JS
DatoCMS
DatoCMS
Sanity
Sanity

What are some alternatives to Gatsby, Gatsby Cloud?

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Pelican

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

MkDocs

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope