Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Gatsby

3.2K
2.4K
+ 1
121
Jekyll

1.9K
1.4K
+ 1
230
Middleman

169
190
+ 1
66

Gatsby vs Jekyll vs Middleman: What are the differences?

## Introduction

### Key Differences between Gatsby, Jekyll, and Middleman

1. **Architecture**: Gatsby is built using React and GraphQL, providing a modern development experience with server-side rendering and client-side hydration, while Jekyll and Middleman use Ruby with a more traditional static site generation approach.

2. **Plugin Ecosystem**: Gatsby has a vast plugin ecosystem that allows developers to extend the functionality easily, while Jekyll and Middleman have a smaller community and fewer plugins available for customization.

3. **Performance**: Gatsby is known for its fast build times and optimized performance due to its use of GraphQL and webpack for bundling assets, whereas Jekyll and Middleman can be slower for larger sites as they lack the same level of optimization.

4. **Learning Curve**: Gatsby requires developers to have knowledge of React and GraphQL, which might have a steeper learning curve for beginners compared to Jekyll and Middleman, which use simpler templating languages like Liquid or ERB.

5. **Data Handling**: Gatsby excels in handling dynamic data sources from APIs and CMSs, making it a great choice for content-heavy websites, whereas Jekyll and Middleman are best suited for simpler static websites without complex data requirements.

6. **Community Support**: Gatsby has a thriving community and active development with regular updates, while Jekyll and Middleman have been around longer and have established communities but may not have as frequent updates or new features.

In Summary, Gatsby, Jekyll, and Middleman differ in architecture, plugin ecosystem, performance, learning curve, data handling, and community support, catering to different needs and preferences of developers.

Decisions about Gatsby, Jekyll, and Middleman
Manuel Feller
Frontend Engineer at BI X · | 4 upvotes · 163.2K views

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Gatsby
Pros of Jekyll
Pros of Middleman
  • 28
    Generated websites are super fast
  • 16
    Fast
  • 15
    GraphQL
  • 10
    Progressive Web Apps generation
  • 9
    Easy to connect with lots of CMS via official plugins
  • 9
    Reusable components (React)
  • 7
    Allows to use markdown files as articles
  • 5
    Static-sites
  • 5
    All the benefits of a static website + React+GraphQL
  • 5
    Images
  • 4
    List of starters as base for new project
  • 3
    Easy to connect with Drupal via official plugin
  • 3
    Open source
  • 1
    Gitlab pages integration
  • 1
    Incremental Build
  • 74
    Github pages integration
  • 54
    Open source
  • 37
    It's slick, customisable and hackerish
  • 24
    Easy to deploy
  • 23
    Straightforward cms for the hacker mindset
  • 7
    Gitlab pages integration
  • 5
    Best for blogging
  • 2
    Low maintenance
  • 2
    Easy to integrate localization
  • 1
    Huge plugins ecosystem
  • 1
    Authoring freedom and simplicity
  • 20
    Rails for static sites
  • 18
    Erb, haml, slim
  • 17
    Live reload
  • 7
    Easy setup
  • 3
    Emacs org-mode integration by middleman-org
  • 1
    Make front-end easy and rock solid again

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Gatsby
Cons of Jekyll
Cons of Middleman
  • 6
    No ssr
  • 3
    Very slow builds
  • 3
    Documentation isn't complete.
  • 2
    For-profit
  • 2
    Slow builds
  • 2
    Flash of unstyled content issues
  • 1
    Problematic between develop and build commands
  • 1
    Difficult debugging
  • 1
    Too many dependencies
  • 1
    Plugin driven development
  • 1
    Difficult maintenance
  • 4
    Build time increases exponentially as site grows
  • 2
    Lack of developments lately
  • 1
    Og doesn't work with postings dynamically
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Gatsby?

    Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

    What is Jekyll?

    Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

    What is Middleman?

    Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Gatsby?
    What companies use Jekyll?
    What companies use Middleman?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Gatsby?
    What tools integrate with Jekyll?
    What tools integrate with Middleman?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitNode.jsFirebase+5
    7
    2361
    GitHubPythonSlack+25
    7
    3161
    What are some alternatives to Gatsby, Jekyll, and Middleman?
    Hugo
    Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
    Next.js
    Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.
    React
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    Create React App
    Create React apps with no build configuration.
    WordPress
    The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.
    See all alternatives