StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Static Site Generators
  5. Gatsby vs Nuxt.js

Gatsby vs Nuxt.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gatsby
Gatsby
Stacks3.3K
Followers2.4K
Votes121
GitHub Stars55.9K
Forks10.3K
Nuxt.js
Nuxt.js
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.7K
Votes372

Gatsby vs Nuxt.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Gatsby and Nuxt.js are both popular frameworks used for building websites and applications. While they have some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart. In this markdown, I will outline the key differences between Gatsby and Nuxt.js.

  1. 1. Development Approach: Gatsby is a static site generator, meaning it generates static HTML files during the build process which can be served to users. On the other hand, Nuxt.js is a server-side rendering (SSR) framework that runs on the server and generates HTML dynamically for each request. This difference in development approach affects how the websites built with these frameworks perform and how they handle dynamic content.

  2. 2. Language Choice: Gatsby is primarily built using JavaScript and React, making it well-suited for developers familiar with these technologies. Nuxt.js, on the other hand, is built using JavaScript and Vue.js, providing a different ecosystem and developer experience. The choice of language and framework can depend on the preferences and expertise of the development team.

  3. 3. Routing and Navigation: Gatsby uses a file-based routing approach where routes are defined based on the file structure of the project. This can be useful for small to medium-sized websites. Nuxt.js, on the other hand, includes a robust routing system that allows for more complex routing configurations, including nested routes and dynamic routing. This makes Nuxt.js a better choice for larger and more dynamic websites.

  4. 4. Build Time vs Runtime: Gatsby focuses on build-time optimizations, generating static HTML files during the build process, which results in fast loading times for users. Nuxt.js, being an SSR framework, generates HTML dynamically at runtime, allowing for dynamic content and interactions. This difference in approach affects the performance and flexibility of the websites built with these frameworks.

  5. 5. Plugin Ecosystem: Gatsby has a rich plugin ecosystem that allows developers to extend its functionality with ease. The plugin community for Gatsby is large and active, providing a wide range of plugins for various purposes. Nuxt.js, on the other hand, has a smaller plugin ecosystem compared to Gatsby, but it still offers a good selection of plugins for common tasks. The choice of framework can depend on the specific needs and requirements of the project.

  6. 6. Community and Documentation: Both Gatsby and Nuxt.js have vibrant communities and extensive documentation to support developers. However, Gatsby has been around for a longer time and has a larger community size, which means a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support. Nuxt.js, being a newer framework, has a smaller community compared to Gatsby, but it is rapidly growing and gaining popularity.

In summary, Gatsby and Nuxt.js have key differences in their development approach, language choice, routing and navigation, build time vs runtime, plugin ecosystem, and community support. The choice between these frameworks should be based on the specific needs of the project and the preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gatsby
Gatsby
Nuxt.js
Nuxt.js

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

-
Automatic transpilation and bundling; Hot module replacement; Server-side rendering OR Single Page App OR Static Generated, you choose 🔥; Static file serving; Configurable with a nuxt.config.js file; Custom layouts with the layouts/ directory; Middleware; Code splitting for every pages
Statistics
GitHub Stars
55.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
10.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.3K
Stacks
2.0K
Followers
2.4K
Followers
1.7K
Votes
121
Votes
372
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    Generated websites are super fast
  • 16
    Fast
  • 15
    GraphQL
  • 10
    Progressive Web Apps generation
  • 9
    Reusable components (React)
Cons
  • 7
    No ssr
  • 4
    Documentation isn't complete.
  • 3
    Very slow builds
  • 2
    Slow builds
  • 2
    Flash of unstyled content issues
Pros
  • 62
    SSR
  • 47
    Automatic routes
  • 33
    Middleware
  • 29
    Hot code reloading
  • 22
    Easy setup, easy to use, great community, FRENCH TOUCH
Integrations
WordPress
WordPress
TypeScript
TypeScript
GraphCMS
GraphCMS
Babel
Babel
prismic.io
prismic.io
AWS Amplify
AWS Amplify
Glamorous
Glamorous
Prisma
Prisma
styled-components
styled-components
Emotion
Emotion
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Gatsby, Nuxt.js?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase