StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Gerrit Code Review vs Jenkins

Gerrit Code Review vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Gerrit Code Review and Jenkins

Gerrit Code Review and Jenkins are two popular tools used in the software development process. While both serve different purposes, they have distinct differences that set them apart.

  1. Architecture: Gerrit Code Review is a web-based code collaboration tool that provides a platform for code review and change management. It is built on top of Git version control system, allowing developers to submit changes for review. On the other hand, Jenkins is an open-source automation server that is used primarily for continuous integration and delivery. It helps in automating the build, test, and deployment processes.

  2. Code Review vs Automation: Gerrit Code Review specifically focuses on the code review process. It provides a platform for developers to review and approve changes made to the codebase before merging them. Jenkins, on the other hand, is aimed at automating the entire development lifecycle. It supports various plugins and integrations to automate tasks such as building, testing, and deploying the code.

  3. Workflow: Gerrit Code Review follows a pre-submit workflow, where changes are reviewed and approved before they can be merged into the main codebase. It enforces a strict code review process, ensuring that only high-quality code gets merged. Jenkins, on the other hand, follows a post-submit workflow, where changes are built, tested, and deployed after they have been merged. It focuses on automating the development pipeline and providing feedback on the build and test results.

  4. User Interface: Gerrit Code Review has a dedicated web-based user interface specifically designed for code review and change management. It provides features such as inline commenting, side-by-side diff view, and review dashboard. Jenkins, on the other hand, has a web-based user interface that provides a dashboard for managing and monitoring the builds and jobs. It offers various views and plugins to visualize the build and test results.

  5. Integration: Gerrit Code Review integrates tightly with Git, allowing developers to push changes for review directly from their Git client. It also provides integration with popular code hosting platforms such as GitHub and GitLab. Jenkins, on the other hand, can be integrated with various version control systems, build tools, and deployment platforms. It supports plugins that enable seamless integration with tools like Git, Maven, Docker, etc.

  6. Scope: Gerrit Code Review is primarily focused on the code review process and change management. It provides a platform for collaboration between developers and a central place for reviewing and approving code changes. Jenkins, on the other hand, has a wider scope and can be used for automating various aspects of the development process, including building, testing, and deploying the code.

In summary, Gerrit Code Review is a specialized tool for code review and change management, while Jenkins is an automation server that focuses on continuous integration and delivery. Gerrit Code Review enforces a pre-submit workflow and provides a dedicated user interface for code review, while Jenkins automates the development pipeline and offers a wide range of integrations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Gerrit Code Review

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
116
Followers
50.4K
Followers
223
Votes
2.2K
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
  • 10
    Open source
Integrations
No integrations available
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Gerrit Code Review?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana