Overview

Review Board

Stacks19

Followers52

Votes6

GitHub Stars1.7K

Forks435

Gerrit Code Review

Stacks116

Followers223

Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs Review Board: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Gerrit Code Review and Review Board are both popular tools used for code review in software development. While they serve the same purpose, there are several key differences between them that developers and teams should be aware of. Here are six specific differences between Gerrit Code Review and Review Board.

1. Workflow: Gerrit Code Review follows a "change-based" workflow, where each code change is submitted as a separate entity. This allows for precise tracking and management of individual changes. On the other hand, Review Board follows a "review-request-based" workflow, where code changes are grouped into review requests, which can include multiple changes related to a specific feature or bug fix.

2. Integration with Version Control Systems (VCS): Gerrit Code Review has tight integration with Git, making it the preferred choice for projects that use Git as their version control system. In contrast, Review Board supports a wide range of VCS such as Git, Mercurial, Subversion, and Perforce, providing more flexibility for teams using different VCS.

3. User Interface (UI): Gerrit Code Review has a primarily web-based UI that is focused on providing a streamlined code review experience. It offers features such as inline commenting, side-by-side diff view, and a searchable change history. Review Board, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive web-based UI with additional features like file attachment, discussion threads, and user dashboards.

4. Extensibility and Plugin Ecosystem: Gerrit Code Review provides a robust plugin ecosystem, allowing users to customize and extend its functionalities as per their requirements. It also has integration capabilities with popular development tools like Jenkins for continuous integration. Review Board, although it supports plugins, does not have as extensive an ecosystem as Gerrit Code Review.

5. Permission and Access Control: Gerrit Code Review offers fine-grained access control, allowing administrators to define access rules based on user roles, project ownership, and branch permissions. This ensures that only authorized users can approve and merge code changes. Review Board also provides access control features but may not offer the same level of granularity as Gerrit Code Review.

6. Code Hosting Options: Gerrit Code Review is typically self-hosted, meaning it requires installation and maintenance on the user's infrastructure. In contrast, Review Board offers both self-hosted and cloud-hosted options. This makes Review Board a more convenient choice for teams that do not want the hassle of managing their own infrastructure.

In summary, Gerrit Code Review and Review Board differ in their workflow approach, integration with VCS, user interface, extensibility, permission control, and hosting options. Developers and teams should consider these differences while choosing a code review tool that aligns with their specific needs and requirements.

🔥 Trending in Code Review on StackShare

fossabot Code Review

fossabot

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

1

Detailed Comparison

Review Board	Gerrit Code Review
Review Board is an open source, web-based code and document review tool built to help companies, open source projects, and other organizations keep their quality high and their bug count low.	Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.
Syntax-highlighted diffs; Smarter indentation handling; Moved code detection; Know exactly what function or class you're in; See more context in your diffs; Multi-line commenting in diffs/text files; Track status of automated builds and reviews	git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 435	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 19	Stacks 116
Followers 52	Followers 223
Votes 6	Votes 67
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Simple to use. Great UI 1 Diff between review versions 1 Open Source 1 Review Bots	Pros 14 Code review 12 Good workflow 11 Cleaner repository story 10 Good integration with Jenkins 10 Open source
Integrations
Travis CI Slack iDoneThis Bitbucket GitHub Git Azure DevOps CircleCI GitLab Trello	Git

What are some alternatives to Review Board, Gerrit Code Review?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.