StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Gerrit Code Review vs TeamCity

Gerrit Code Review vs TeamCity

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TeamCity
TeamCity
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes316
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review
Stacks116
Followers223
Votes67

Gerrit Code Review vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Gerrit Code Review and TeamCity

Gerrit Code Review is a web-based team code collaboration tool while TeamCity is a continuous integration and deployment server designed for developers and DevOps teams. 
1. **Code Collaboration vs. Continuous Integration:** Gerrit focuses primarily on code collaboration, allowing developers to review code changes and provide feedback before merging, whereas TeamCity is focused on automating build, test, and deployment processes.
2. **Code Review Workflow:** In Gerrit, code reviews are done before merging changes into the main codebase, enforcing a strict approval process. TeamCity, on the other hand, does not have a built-in code review feature but can be integrated with external code review tools.
3. **User Interface:** Gerrit Code Review has a lightweight web interface tailored specifically for code reviews, with features like inline commenting and code version comparison. TeamCity has a more comprehensive, dashboard-like interface that displays build statuses, test results, and deployment information.
4. **Integration:** Gerrit Code Review is tightly integrated with Git repositories and is often used in conjunction with Git for version control. TeamCity, while also supporting Git, is designed to work with a variety of version control systems such as SVN, Mercurial, and Perforce.
5. **Build and Deployment Automation:** TeamCity excels in automating build, test, and deployment processes, with features like build pipelines, build triggers, and artifact management. Gerrit Code Review, while facilitating code collaboration, does not have built-in automation capabilities for the development process.
6. **Role in Development Lifecycle:** Gerrit Code Review serves as a gatekeeper for code changes, ensuring code quality through reviews and approvals. TeamCity, on the other hand, focuses on streamlining the build and deployment process, helping developers deliver software faster and more reliably.

In Summary, Gerrit Code Review is primarily focused on code collaboration and reviews, while TeamCity is designed for continuous integration and deployment automation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity
TeamCity
Gerrit Code Review
Gerrit Code Review

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
git repository hosting; pre-commit code review; commenting on diffs; updating a single commit with multiple patch sets; project-based access control; protecting repositories
Statistics
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
116
Followers
1.1K
Followers
223
Votes
316
Votes
67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    On premise
  • 32
    User friendly
  • 32
    Github integration
Cons
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    Proprietary
  • 2
    User-friendly
  • 2
    User friendly
Pros
  • 14
    Code review
  • 12
    Good workflow
  • 11
    Cleaner repository story
  • 10
    Good integration with Jenkins
  • 10
    Open source
Integrations
Slack
Slack
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, Gerrit Code Review?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana