Overview

Ghost

Stacks514

Followers506

Votes219

GitHub Stars51.1K

Forks11.1K

Strapi

Stacks717

Followers1.3K

Votes277

GitHub Stars70.2K

Forks9.2K

Ghost vs Strapi: What are the differences?

Ghost is a streamlined CMS for online content, while Strapi is a flexible headless CMS enabling API customization for content-rich applications. Let's explore the key differences between the two:

Content Management: Ghost is a headless CMS specifically designed for creating and managing content, focusing on writing experience and publishing blog posts. It offers a simplified interface for authors and provides intuitive tools for content creation and organization. On the other hand, Strapi is a fully-featured, self-hosted CMS that allows users to create and manage various types of content, including blog posts, static pages, and even complex web applications. It provides a flexible content model and extensive customization options for developers.
Front-end Development: Ghost focuses on providing an excellent writing experience for authors and simplifies the process of publishing content in a clean and minimalistic way. It comes with built-in templates and theme options, allowing users to customize the appearance of their blogs without extensive front-end development knowledge. Whereas, Strapi provides a powerful API-driven development experience, allowing developers to build custom front-end applications using their preferred frameworks and technologies. It offers a wide range of APIs and plugins, enabling developers to integrate their CMS with various front-end tools and technologies.
User Interface and User Experience: Ghost provides a user-friendly and distraction-free writing interface, emphasizing productivity and the creation of high-quality content. It offers a clean and minimalistic design, allowing authors to focus solely on writing without unnecessary distractions. On the other hand, Strapi offers a more robust and feature-rich user interface, providing powerful content management capabilities. It includes a comprehensive dashboard for managing content, user roles, and permissions, making it suitable for larger and more complex projects with multiple contributors.
Hosting and Deployment: Ghost offers a hosted platform that takes care of the infrastructure and hosting of your blog, allowing users to focus solely on content creation and publishing. This option is suitable for users who prefer a hassle-free setup and maintenance experience. Strapi, on the other hand, is a self-hosted CMS, which means users have full control over their infrastructure and deployment options. It can be deployed on various hosting providers or cloud platforms, offering more flexibility and scalability for projects with specific hosting requirements.
Extensibility and Customization: Ghost provides a limited number of built-in features and extensions, focusing on simplicity and performance. While it offers some customization options through themes and templates, the overall extensibility of Ghost is relatively limited compared to Strapi. Strapi, being a flexible and extensible CMS, allows developers to create custom plugins and extensions to add new features and functionalities to their projects. It provides a robust plugin ecosystem and a customizable admin panel, giving developers greater control over the CMS.
Community and Support: Ghost has a dedicated and active community of users and developers, providing support through forums, documentation, and official resources. It also offers premium support options for users who require additional assistance. Strapi, being an open-source CMS, has a growing community of developers and contributors. It provides extensive documentation, community forums, and official support channels to help users and developers with their projects.

In summary, Ghost is a focused, minimalistic CMS designed for content publishing with a simplified interface and hosting options, while Strapi is a flexible, extensible CMS suitable for various types of projects with a more feature-rich interface and self-hosted deployment capabilities.

🔥 Trending in Platform as a Service on StackShare

Daytona Platform As A Service

The open source development environment manager

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

6

Advice on Ghost, Strapi

Xander

Founder at Rate My Meeting

Mar 30, 2020

Decided

So many choices for CMSs these days. So then what do you choose if speed, security and customization are key? Headless for one. Consuming your own APIs for content is absolute key. It makes designing pages in the front-end a breeze. Leaving Ghost and Cockpit. If I then looked at the footprint and impact on server load, Cockpit definitely wins that battle.

243k views243k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ghost	Strapi
Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.	Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.
An intuitive, minimal editor; Ultra-fast content management; All SEO features built-in natively; Native desktop & mobile apps; Publish once, distribute everywhere; Headless CMS with Node.js REST APIs; Over 19x faster than WordPress; Secure & independently audited; Custom theme or any JAMstack front-end	Files structure; Controllers; Filters; Models; Attributes; Relations; Many-to-many; One-to-many; One-to-one; One-way; Lifecycle callbacks; Internationalization; Plugin; Plugin styles; Policies; Global policies; Scoped policies; Plugin policies; Public assets; Requests; Responses; Routing; Role-based access control; Services;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 51.1K	GitHub Stars 70.2K
GitHub Forks 11.1K	GitHub Forks 9.2K
Stacks 514	Stacks 717
Followers 506	Followers 1.3K
Votes 219	Votes 277
Pros & Cons
Pros 45 Beautiful 35 Fast 29 Quick/simple post styling 20 Live Post Preview 20 Open source	Pros 57 Free 40 Open source 28 Self-hostable 27 Rapid development 25 API-based cms Cons 9 Can be limiting 8 Internationalisation 6 A bit buggy 5 DB Migrations not seemless
Integrations
No integrations available	Twilio SendGrid Node.js Ruby PostgreSQL Gatsby Google App Engine Hugo Flask Apache Cordova Angular

What are some alternatives to Ghost, Strapi?

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.