StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Git vs Phabricator

Git vs Phabricator

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Phabricator
Phabricator
Stacks221
Followers323
Votes187
Git
Git
Stacks343.7K
Followers184.2K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars57.1K
Forks26.9K

Git vs Phabricator: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Git and Phabricator highlighting key differences between the two.

1. **Version Control System**: Git is a distributed version control system, whereas Phabricator is a suite of tools for code review, repository hosting, and project management. In essence, Git is primarily focused on version control, while Phabricator offers a broader range of project management tools.
2. **Collaboration and Code Review**: Git, being a version control system, lacks advanced code review features, which are extensively provided by Phabricator. Phabricator offers robust code review capabilities such as differential revisions, inline comments, and detailed feedback mechanisms, enhancing collaboration among team members.
3. **Project Management Integration**: While Git is more centered around version control, Phabricator integrates project management tools seamlessly into its platform. It provides features like task management, project tracking, and integration with other project management tools, making it a comprehensive solution for development teams.
4. **Continuous Integration Support**: Phabricator includes continuous integration support through tools like Harbormaster, enabling automated testing and deployment workflows. Git, on the other hand, lacks native support for continuous integration and requires external tools for setting up such workflows.
5. **User Interface and User Experience**: Phabricator offers a unified user interface for code review, project management, and collaboration tools, providing a seamless user experience. Git, being a version control system, typically relies on command-line interfaces or third-party GUI tools, which may require additional setup and configuration for a consistent user experience.
6. **Scalability and Customization**: Phabricator offers extensive customization options and scalability to cater to the diverse needs of large development teams. Git, while highly scalable for version control, may require additional tools and integrations for achieving similar levels of customization and scalability in a collaborative environment.

In Summary, this Markdown code outlines key differences between Git and Phabricator, highlighting their distinct focuses on version control and project management tools, collaboration features, integration capabilities, user experience, and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Phabricator
Phabricator
Git
Git

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

reviewing code before it hits master; auditing code after it hits master; hosting Git/Hg/SVN repositories; tracking bugs or "features"; counting down to HL3; expounding liberal tomes of text; nit picking pixels with designers; "project" "manage" "ment"; hiding stuff from coworkers; and also other random things, like memes, badges, and tokens.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
57.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
26.9K
Stacks
221
Stacks
343.7K
Followers
323
Followers
184.2K
Votes
187
Votes
6.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Open Source
  • 29
    Code Review
  • 25
    Supports Git/Hg/SVN
  • 18
    Bug Tracking
  • 17
    Audit Source Code
Pros
  • 1429
    Distributed version control system
  • 1053
    Efficient branching and merging
  • 959
    Fast
  • 843
    Open source
  • 726
    Better than svn
Cons
  • 16
    Hard to learn
  • 11
    Inconsistent command line interface
  • 9
    Easy to lose uncommitted work
  • 8
    Worst documentation ever possibly made
  • 5
    Awful merge handling
Integrations
Asana
Asana
Jira
Jira
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jenkins
Jenkins
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Mercurial
Mercurial
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Phabricator, Git?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Mercurial

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

SVN (Subversion)

SVN (Subversion)

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana