GitBucket vs Gitea: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitBucket and Gitea are both popular self-hosted Git platforms that provide similar functionalities for managing Git repositories. However, there are several key differences between these two platforms.

1. User Interface and Design: GitBucket has a more polished and modern user interface with a cleaner design, while Gitea has a more simplistic and lightweight user interface. GitBucket provides a more visually appealing and user-friendly experience, making it easier for users to navigate and interact with the platform.

2. Community and Support: Gitea has a larger and more active open-source community compared to GitBucket. This means that Gitea has a wider range of plugins, extensions, and community-contributed features available for users to enhance their Git experience. Additionally, Gitea has a more active development and support team, which leads to regular updates and bug fixes.

3. Performance and Resource Usage: Gitea is known for its lightweight and resource-efficient design, resulting in faster loading times and lower resource consumption compared to GitBucket. This makes Gitea a preferable choice for those looking for a Git platform that can be hosted on lower-end hardware or limited resources.

4. Integration and Compatibility: GitBucket provides better integration with external services and tools such as Jenkins, Slack, and sonarQube. It offers more comprehensive and seamless integration options, allowing users to automate their development workflow and integrate GitBucket with their existing tools and services easily.

5. Authentication and Access Control: Gitea offers more advanced authentication and access control options compared to GitBucket. It provides support for multiple authentication methods like OAuth, LDAP, and SMTP, allowing users to integrate with their existing user management systems. Gitea also offers more fine-grained access control settings, enabling administrators to have more control over user permissions and repository access.

6. Migration and Compatibility with Git Services: GitBucket has better compatibility with existing Git services such as GitHub. It provides a smooth migration process from GitHub, allowing users to easily import their repositories and issues from GitHub to GitBucket. This feature is particularly useful for those looking to switch from GitHub to a self-hosted Git platform.

In summary, GitBucket provides a more visually appealing user interface and better compatibility with external services like Jenkins and Slack. On the other hand, Gitea has a larger community, better performance and resource usage, more advanced authentication and access control options, and smoother migration and compatibility with existing Git services.