GitBucket vs Gitea

Overview

GitBucket

Stacks79

Followers177

Votes36

Gitea

Stacks322

Followers448

Votes123

GitHub Stars51.8K

Forks6.2K

GitBucket vs Gitea: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitBucket and Gitea are both popular self-hosted Git platforms that provide similar functionalities for managing Git repositories. However, there are several key differences between these two platforms.

User Interface and Design: GitBucket has a more polished and modern user interface with a cleaner design, while Gitea has a more simplistic and lightweight user interface. GitBucket provides a more visually appealing and user-friendly experience, making it easier for users to navigate and interact with the platform.
Community and Support: Gitea has a larger and more active open-source community compared to GitBucket. This means that Gitea has a wider range of plugins, extensions, and community-contributed features available for users to enhance their Git experience. Additionally, Gitea has a more active development and support team, which leads to regular updates and bug fixes.
Performance and Resource Usage: Gitea is known for its lightweight and resource-efficient design, resulting in faster loading times and lower resource consumption compared to GitBucket. This makes Gitea a preferable choice for those looking for a Git platform that can be hosted on lower-end hardware or limited resources.
Integration and Compatibility: GitBucket provides better integration with external services and tools such as Jenkins, Slack, and sonarQube. It offers more comprehensive and seamless integration options, allowing users to automate their development workflow and integrate GitBucket with their existing tools and services easily.
Authentication and Access Control: Gitea offers more advanced authentication and access control options compared to GitBucket. It provides support for multiple authentication methods like OAuth, LDAP, and SMTP, allowing users to integrate with their existing user management systems. Gitea also offers more fine-grained access control settings, enabling administrators to have more control over user permissions and repository access.
Migration and Compatibility with Git Services: GitBucket has better compatibility with existing Git services such as GitHub. It provides a smooth migration process from GitHub, allowing users to easily import their repositories and issues from GitHub to GitBucket. This feature is particularly useful for those looking to switch from GitHub to a self-hosted Git platform.

In summary, GitBucket provides a more visually appealing user interface and better compatibility with external services like Jenkins and Slack. On the other hand, Gitea has a larger community, better performance and resource usage, more advanced authentication and access control options, and smoother migration and compatibility with existing Git services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitBucket, Gitea

Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

740k views740k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitBucket	Gitea
GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.	Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.
Public / Private Git repository (http and ssh access);Repository viewer and online file editing;Repository search (Code and Issues);Wiki;Issues;Fork / Pull request;Mail notification;Activity timeline;User management (for Administrators);Group (like Organization in Github);LDAP integration;Gravatar support	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 51.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 6.2K
Stacks 79	Stacks 322
Followers 177	Followers 448
Votes 36	Votes 123
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Self hosted 7 Open source 6 Familiar interface 5 Scala 5 Simple setup	Pros 24 Self-hosted 16 Lightweight 15 Free 12 Simple 9 Easy Setup Cons 3 Community-fork of Gogs 0 Easy Windows authentication is not supported
Integrations
No integrations available	Raspberry Pi DingTalk Discord OpenLDAP Drone.io Jenkins Vagrant MySQL SQLite PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to GitBucket, Gitea?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Related Comparisons

GitBucket vs Gitea: What are the differences?

Introduction

User Interface and Design: GitBucket has a more polished and modern user interface with a cleaner design, while Gitea has a more simplistic and lightweight user interface. GitBucket provides a more visually appealing and user-friendly experience, making it easier for users to navigate and interact with the platform.
Community and Support: Gitea has a larger and more active open-source community compared to GitBucket. This means that Gitea has a wider range of plugins, extensions, and community-contributed features available for users to enhance their Git experience. Additionally, Gitea has a more active development and support team, which leads to regular updates and bug fixes.
Performance and Resource Usage: Gitea is known for its lightweight and resource-efficient design, resulting in faster loading times and lower resource consumption compared to GitBucket. This makes Gitea a preferable choice for those looking for a Git platform that can be hosted on lower-end hardware or limited resources.
Integration and Compatibility: GitBucket provides better integration with external services and tools such as Jenkins, Slack, and sonarQube. It offers more comprehensive and seamless integration options, allowing users to automate their development workflow and integrate GitBucket with their existing tools and services easily.
Authentication and Access Control: Gitea offers more advanced authentication and access control options compared to GitBucket. It provides support for multiple authentication methods like OAuth, LDAP, and SMTP, allowing users to integrate with their existing user management systems. Gitea also offers more fine-grained access control settings, enabling administrators to have more control over user permissions and repository access.
Migration and Compatibility with Git Services: GitBucket has better compatibility with existing Git services such as GitHub. It provides a smooth migration process from GitHub, allowing users to easily import their repositories and issues from GitHub to GitBucket. This feature is particularly useful for those looking to switch from GitHub to a self-hosted Git platform.

GitBucket vs Gitea

Overview