GitBucket vs Upsource: What are the differences?
GitBucket: The easily installable Github clone powered by Scala. GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request; Upsource: Self-hosted Git, Mercurial, Subversion and Perforce repository browser and code review tool. Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.
GitBucket and Upsource can be categorized as "Code Collaboration & Version Control" tools.
Some of the features offered by GitBucket are:
- Public / Private Git repository (http and ssh access)
- Repository viewer and online file editing
- Repository search (Code and Issues)
On the other hand, Upsource provides the following key features:
- Instantly access all your projects
- Keep track of code changes
- Use code insight in Java projects
"Self hosted" is the top reason why over 7 developers like GitBucket, while over 13 developers mention "Free for 10 users" as the leading cause for choosing Upsource.
GitBucket is an open source tool with 7.73K GitHub stars and 1.06K GitHub forks. Here's a link to GitBucket's open source repository on GitHub.
8ack GmbH, Koch Essen Kommunikation + Design GmbH, and DairyWindow are some of the popular companies that use GitBucket, whereas Upsource is used by SAYMON, Kialo, and simpleshow GmbH. GitBucket has a broader approval, being mentioned in 3 company stacks & 6 developers stacks; compared to Upsource, which is listed in 3 company stacks and 4 developer stacks.