Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GitHub vs Gitpod: What are the differences?
Introduction
GitHub and Gitpod are both popular tools used in software development, but they differ in several key aspects. Understanding the differences between GitHub and Gitpod can help developers choose the right tool for their project requirements and workflow. Below are the key differences between GitHub and Gitpod.
Hosting and Collaboration: GitHub is primarily a web-based hosting platform for open-source projects, allowing developers to store, manage, and collaborate on code repositories. It provides a centralized platform for version control, issue tracking, and project management. On the other hand, Gitpod is an online integrated development environment (IDE) that leverages the power of Git and allows developers to write, review, and ship code without the need for complex local development setups. Gitpod integrates seamlessly with GitHub, enabling developers to open and work on their repositories directly from the GitHub interface.
Workspace Environment: In GitHub, developers typically work with their repositories locally using their preferred IDEs or text editors. Gitpod, on the other hand, provides a cloud-based workspace environment where developers can instantly start coding without any local setup. Gitpod automatically builds a complete development environment using Docker, ensuring that all the necessary tools, dependencies, and extensions are readily available. This allows developers to work from any machine with an internet connection, enabling more flexibility and faster onboarding.
Configuration and Customization: GitHub allows developers to configure their repositories by adding files such as READMEs, licenses, and configuration files. It also provides a variety of features and integrations that can be customized to suit the needs of a project. Gitpod, on the other hand, focuses on providing a consistent development environment out of the box. While developers can customize certain aspects of their Gitpod workspace, such as configuring Git settings or installing specific tools, its main goal is to provide a standardized environment that works across all projects.
Development Workflow: GitHub is primarily designed for managing the versioning and collaboration aspects of software development. Developers clone repositories locally, make changes, commit them, and then push those changes back to the GitHub repository. Gitpod, on the other hand, provides a more streamlined development workflow within the browser. Developers can simply open their repositories in Gitpod and start coding directly within the web IDE. Gitpod automatically saves and synchronizes changes, making it easier to switch between different machines or collaborate with teammates.
Collaboration Features: GitHub offers extensive collaboration features, such as pull requests, code reviews, and issue tracking. It allows developers to work together, review code changes, and manage project tasks within a centralized platform. Gitpod, while integrated with GitHub, focuses more on the individual development experience. It provides features like live collaboration, where multiple users can work simultaneously in the same workspace, making it easier for teams to pair program or troubleshoot code together.
Pricing and Availability: GitHub offers both free and paid plans, with additional features and storage available for paid users. Gitpod also has free and paid plans, but it is more focused on providing a cloud-based development environment rather than hosting repositories. Gitpod can be used in conjunction with a code hosting platform like GitHub or GitLab. The pricing and availability of Gitpod depend on the chosen plan and the integrations required.
In Summary, GitHub is a web-based hosting platform for code repositories with extensive collaboration features, while Gitpod is a cloud-based IDE that provides a streamlined development environment accessible anywhere.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.
SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.
As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i
is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.
Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!
At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.
Pros of GitHub
- Open source friendly1.8K
- Easy source control1.5K
- Nice UI1.3K
- Great for team collaboration1.1K
- Easy setup867
- Issue tracker504
- Great community487
- Remote team collaboration483
- Great way to share449
- Pull request and features planning442
- Just works147
- Integrated in many tools132
- Free Public Repos122
- Github Gists116
- Github pages113
- Easy to find repos83
- Open source62
- Easy to find projects60
- It's free60
- Network effect56
- Extensive API49
- Organizations43
- Branching42
- Developer Profiles34
- Git Powered Wikis32
- Great for collaboration30
- It's fun24
- Clean interface and good integrations23
- Community SDK involvement22
- Learn from others source code20
- Because: Git16
- It integrates directly with Azure14
- Standard in Open Source collab10
- Newsfeed10
- Fast8
- Beautiful user experience8
- It integrates directly with Hipchat8
- Easy to discover new code libraries7
- Smooth integration6
- Integrations6
- Graphs6
- Nice API6
- It's awesome6
- Cloud SCM6
- Quick Onboarding5
- Remarkable uptime5
- CI Integration5
- Reliable5
- Hands down best online Git service available5
- Version Control4
- Unlimited Public Repos at no cost4
- Simple but powerful4
- Loved by developers4
- Free HTML hosting4
- Uses GIT4
- Security options4
- Easy to use and collaborate with others4
- Easy deployment via SSH3
- Ci3
- IAM3
- Nice to use3
- Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects2
- Beautiful2
- Self Hosted2
- Issues tracker2
- Easy source control and everything is backed up2
- Never dethroned2
- All in one development service2
- Good tools support2
- Free HTML hostings2
- IAM integration2
- Very Easy to Use2
- Easy to use2
- Leads the copycats2
- Free private repos2
- Profound1
- Dasf1
Pros of Gitpod
- Can be locally hosted3
- Open Source3
- Cloud IDE2
- Declarative worksaces in VCS2
- JetBrains IDEs Supported1
- Prebuilds1
- Multiple-IDEs Support1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GitHub
- Owned by micrcosoft55
- Expensive for lone developers that want private repos38
- Relatively slow product/feature release cadence15
- API scoping could be better10
- Only 3 collaborators for private repos9
- Limited featureset for issue management4
- Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens3
- GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions2
- No multilingual interface1
- Takes a long time to commit1
- Expensive1