StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs Gitter

GitHub vs Gitter

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.5K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Gitter
Gitter
Stacks225
Followers257
Votes277

GitHub vs Gitter: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GitHub and Gitter

  1. Functionality: GitHub is primarily a code hosting platform that offers version control, collaboration tools, and project management features. It allows users to track changes, manage code repositories, and collaborate with team members. On the other hand, Gitter is a communication platform designed specifically for developers. It provides real-time chat rooms, allowing developers to have discussions, share code snippets, and engage in conversations related to programming.

  2. Focus: GitHub focuses on providing a platform for hosting and managing code repositories. It offers version control features, issue tracking, code review tools, and project management capabilities. Additionally, it allows developers to collaborate on projects using features like pull requests and code reviews. Gitter, on the other hand, places its main emphasis on facilitating real-time conversations and discussions among developers. It aims to provide a platform for developers to connect with each other, ask questions, and engage in community-driven discussions.

  3. Community: GitHub has a large and active community of developers, with millions of users and numerous open-source projects hosted on the platform. It serves as a hub for developers to contribute to projects, discover new repositories, and showcase their work. Gitter, while also having a developer-focused community, is more centered around real-time interactions. It provides a platform for developers to join specific chat rooms based on their interests or projects, enabling them to connect with like-minded individuals and discuss topics of mutual interest.

  4. Integration: GitHub offers extensive integration capabilities, allowing developers to connect their repositories with various tools and services. It integrates with popular development tools, such as continuous integration systems, project management platforms, and code quality analysis tools. Gitter, on the other hand, is limited in terms of integration options. While it allows users to add widgets and badges to their GitHub repositories, it primarily operates as a standalone communication platform with less emphasis on interconnecting with other tools.

  5. Interface: GitHub provides a comprehensive web interface where users can browse code, view pull requests, manage issues, and perform various other code-related activities. It offers a visually appealing and user-friendly interface with a focus on code and collaboration. Gitter, on the other hand, is primarily chat-based and offers a simple and minimalist interface. It emphasizes real-time conversations and displays messages in chronological order, making it easy for developers to engage in quick and focused discussions.

  6. Ownership: GitHub is owned by Microsoft, a technology giant with a wide range of products and services. Being a part of Microsoft, GitHub benefits from its resources, infrastructure, and support. Gitter, on the other hand, is not owned by Microsoft and operates as an independent entity. While both platforms have their own sets of features and advantages, GitHub's connection to Microsoft provides additional stability and trustworthiness.

In Summary, GitHub is primarily a code hosting and collaboration platform with a strong focus on version control and project management, while Gitter is a real-time chat platform aimed at facilitating developer discussions and interactions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Gitter

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Gitter
Gitter

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Know who's seen any message;Edit messages after you've sent them;Full emoji support;Special Lurk Mode;IRC bridge.;Automatically embeds content like Gists, YouTube, pictures of cats and other stuff;Desktop notifications and @mentions.;Infinite chat history stored in the cloud;Will soon be searchable too;Phew, that's a lot and we're building more constantly.;Desktop app for Mac. Windows, iPhone and Android coming soon. Works perfectly in mobile web browsers.
Statistics
Stacks
295.5K
Stacks
225
Followers
259.0K
Followers
257
Votes
10.4K
Votes
277
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 63
    Github integration
  • 55
    Free
  • 45
    Markdown support
  • 19
    Markdown
  • 17
    Graceful integration
Cons
  • 2
    Sends data to US Gov
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Sprint.ly
Sprint.ly
Trello
Trello
Travis CI
Travis CI
Jenkins
Jenkins

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Gitter?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana