StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs TeamForge

GitHub vs TeamForge

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.6K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
TeamForge
TeamForge
Stacks0
Followers1
Votes0

GitHub vs TeamForge: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GitHub and TeamForge

GitHub and TeamForge are both popular software development platforms, but they have some key differences that make them unique in their own ways. Here are the six main differences between GitHub and TeamForge:

  1. User Interface and Experience: GitHub provides a sleek and intuitive user interface that is known for its simplicity and ease of use. On the other hand, TeamForge offers a more comprehensive and feature-rich interface, with a broader range of functionalities for project management and collaboration.

  2. Open Source vs. Proprietary: GitHub is primarily known for its focus on open-source projects, and it has become a central hub for developers to collaborate and contribute to open-source communities. TeamForge, on the other hand, is a proprietary platform that caters to both open-source and commercial software development projects.

  3. Version Control System: GitHub is built on top of Git, a distributed version control system that offers a fast and efficient way to manage code repositories. TeamForge, on the other hand, supports multiple version control systems, including Git, Subversion, and Perforce, giving developers more flexibility in choosing their preferred system.

  4. Integration and Extensibility: GitHub has a wide range of integrations and extensions that allow developers to connect their repositories with various third-party tools and services. TeamForge also offers integrations with popular tools and services, but it provides more built-in features for project management and collaboration, reducing the reliance on external integrations.

  5. Community and Collaboration: GitHub has a thriving community of developers, with millions of users contributing to open-source projects and sharing their code repositories. It offers powerful collaboration features such as pull requests, code reviews, and issue tracking, making it easy for teams to collaborate on projects. TeamForge also offers collaboration features, but its focus is more on centralized project management and governance.

  6. Scalability and Deployment Options: GitHub is a cloud-based platform that offers a scalable and reliable infrastructure, eliminating the need for self-hosting and maintenance. TeamForge, on the other hand, provides both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, giving organizations more control over their infrastructure and data.

In summary, GitHub and TeamForge differ in terms of their user interface, focus on open source vs. proprietary projects, version control systems supported, integration and extensibility, community and collaboration features, and deployment options. Both platforms have their strengths and cater to different needs, depending on the type of project and organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
TeamForge
TeamForge

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

TeamForge is an Application Lifecycle Manager to help deliver high-quality applications for your customers at speed. Boost development productivity with Agile, Continuous Integration (CI), Continuous Delivery (CD), and DevOps. Equip cross-functional teams with best-of-breed tools, while maintaining governance, compliance, and code security standards.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Third-party tool integration; Supports Git and SVN; Enterprise Grade SCM; Share permissions across GIT and SVN repositories; Workflow automation; Project category mapping; Code reuse; code search; project-focused rollups; reporting; monitoring; analysis; Business intelligence dashboard; Communities; wikis; discussion boards; Peer code reviews; review and approval workflows
Statistics
Stacks
295.6K
Stacks
0
Followers
259.0K
Followers
1
Votes
10.4K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1774
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to GitHub, TeamForge?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot