StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. GitLab CI vs Jenkins X

GitLab CI vs Jenkins X

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab CI
GitLab CI
Stacks2.3K
Followers1.6K
Votes75
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Stacks147
Followers370
Votes16
GitHub Stars4.7K
Forks800

GitLab CI vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between GitLab CI and Jenkins X. Both GitLab CI and Jenkins X are popular continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools, but they have some fundamental differences that set them apart.

  1. Execution Model: GitLab CI follows a pipeline-based execution model, where jobs defined in a YAML file are executed in stages. Each stage can have multiple jobs that run sequentially or in parallel depending on the configuration. Jenkins X, on the other hand, is built on top of Jenkins and Kubernetes, and it uses a serverless approach where pipelines are triggered automatically based on events in the repository, such as code commits or pull requests.

  2. Cloud-Native Architecture: Jenkins X is designed with cloud-native principles in mind, making it well-suited for modern containerized applications and microservices architectures. It leverages cloud-native technologies like Kubernetes to provide scalability and portability. GitLab CI, while it can be used with Kubernetes, does not have the same level of native integration and is more flexible in terms of deployment options.

  3. Built-in Features: GitLab CI includes several built-in features like integrated code review, issue tracking, and a built-in container registry. These features are tightly integrated into the CI/CD process, providing a seamless experience for developers. Jenkins X, on the other hand, focuses primarily on the CI/CD workflow and integrates with external tools for code review, issue tracking, and artifact storage.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: GitLab has a large and active community, with a wide range of plugins and extensions available. GitLab CI benefits from this strong ecosystem and offers a wide range of integrations and extensions. Jenkins, the underlying platform for Jenkins X, has been around for a long time and has a well-established ecosystem with a vast number of plugins and integrations. However, Jenkins X is a relatively new project and its ecosystem is still growing.

  5. Ease of Use and Configuration: GitLab CI provides a user-friendly interface for configuring and managing pipelines. The configuration is done using YAML files, making it easy to version control and share with others. Jenkins X, while it can be configured using YAML files as well, requires more setup and configuration due to its integration with Kubernetes and other cloud-native tools.

  6. Deployment and Scalability: Jenkins X provides built-in support for automatic deployment to Kubernetes clusters, making it easy to deploy and scale applications. GitLab CI, on the other hand, offers more flexibility in terms of deployment options, supporting a wide range of platforms and environments.

In summary, GitLab CI and Jenkins X have different execution models, with GitLab CI following a pipeline-based model and Jenkins X taking a serverless approach. Jenkins X is built with cloud-native principles in mind and has a stronger focus on the CI/CD workflow, while GitLab CI offers integrated features and a wider range of deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab CI, Jenkins X

Stratos
Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

  • Fast SBT builds (caching)
  • Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
  • Everything as code
  • Ease of use
181k views181k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Feb 14, 2020

Decided

Buddy is one of the most easy-to-use tools for CI I ever met. When I needed to set up the pipeline I was really impressed with how easy it is to create it with Buddy with only a few moments. It's literally like:

  1. Add repo
  2. Click - Click - Click
  3. You're done and your app is on prod :D The top feature that I've found is a simple integration with different notification channels - not only Slack (which is the one by default), but Telegram and Discord. The support is also neat - guys respond pretty quickly on even a small issue.
157k views157k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab CI
GitLab CI
Jenkins X
Jenkins X

GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.

Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes

-
Automated CI and CD - Rather than having to have deep knowledge of the internals of Jenkins Pipeline, Jenkins X will default awesome pipelines for your projects that implements fully CI and CD; Environment Promotion via GitOps - Each team gets a set of Environments. Jenkins X then automates the management of the Environments and the Promotion of new versions of Applications between Environments via GitOps; Pull Request Preview Environments - Jenkins X automatically spins up Preview Environments for your Pull Requests so you can get fast feedback before changes are merged to master; Feedback on Issues and Pull Requests - Jenkins X automatically comments on your Commits, Issues and Pull Requests with feedback as code is ready to be previewed, is promoted to environments or if Pull Requests are generated automatically to upgrade versions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
4.7K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
800
Stacks
2.3K
Stacks
147
Followers
1.6K
Followers
370
Votes
75
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 22
    Robust CI with awesome Docker support
  • 13
    Simple configuration
  • 9
    All in one solution
  • 7
    Source Control and CI in one place
  • 5
    Integrated with VCS on commit
Cons
  • 2
    Works best with GitLab repositories
Pros
  • 7
    Kubernetes integration
  • 5
    Scripted Pipelines
  • 4
    GitOps
Cons
  • 1
    Complexity
Integrations
GitLab
GitLab
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
macOS
macOS
Linux Mint
Linux Mint
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Debian
Debian
Fedora
Fedora

What are some alternatives to GitLab CI, Jenkins X?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana