Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GitLab CI

2.3K
1.6K
+ 1
75
Jenkins X

149
369
+ 1
16
Add tool

GitLab CI vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between GitLab CI and Jenkins X. Both GitLab CI and Jenkins X are popular continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) tools, but they have some fundamental differences that set them apart.

  1. Execution Model: GitLab CI follows a pipeline-based execution model, where jobs defined in a YAML file are executed in stages. Each stage can have multiple jobs that run sequentially or in parallel depending on the configuration. Jenkins X, on the other hand, is built on top of Jenkins and Kubernetes, and it uses a serverless approach where pipelines are triggered automatically based on events in the repository, such as code commits or pull requests.

  2. Cloud-Native Architecture: Jenkins X is designed with cloud-native principles in mind, making it well-suited for modern containerized applications and microservices architectures. It leverages cloud-native technologies like Kubernetes to provide scalability and portability. GitLab CI, while it can be used with Kubernetes, does not have the same level of native integration and is more flexible in terms of deployment options.

  3. Built-in Features: GitLab CI includes several built-in features like integrated code review, issue tracking, and a built-in container registry. These features are tightly integrated into the CI/CD process, providing a seamless experience for developers. Jenkins X, on the other hand, focuses primarily on the CI/CD workflow and integrates with external tools for code review, issue tracking, and artifact storage.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: GitLab has a large and active community, with a wide range of plugins and extensions available. GitLab CI benefits from this strong ecosystem and offers a wide range of integrations and extensions. Jenkins, the underlying platform for Jenkins X, has been around for a long time and has a well-established ecosystem with a vast number of plugins and integrations. However, Jenkins X is a relatively new project and its ecosystem is still growing.

  5. Ease of Use and Configuration: GitLab CI provides a user-friendly interface for configuring and managing pipelines. The configuration is done using YAML files, making it easy to version control and share with others. Jenkins X, while it can be configured using YAML files as well, requires more setup and configuration due to its integration with Kubernetes and other cloud-native tools.

  6. Deployment and Scalability: Jenkins X provides built-in support for automatic deployment to Kubernetes clusters, making it easy to deploy and scale applications. GitLab CI, on the other hand, offers more flexibility in terms of deployment options, supporting a wide range of platforms and environments.

In summary, GitLab CI and Jenkins X have different execution models, with GitLab CI following a pipeline-based model and Jenkins X taking a serverless approach. Jenkins X is built with cloud-native principles in mind and has a stronger focus on the CI/CD workflow, while GitLab CI offers integrated features and a wider range of deployment options.

Advice on GitLab CI and Jenkins X
Needs advice
on
CircleCICircleCIGitLab CIGitLab CI
and
Jenkins XJenkins X

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

  • Fast SBT builds (caching)
  • Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
  • Everything as code
  • Ease of use
See more
Replies (3)
Glenn Gillen
Recommends
on
BuildkiteBuildkite

I think I've tried most of the CI tools out there at some point. It took me a while to get around to Buildkite because at first I didn't see much point given it seemed like you had to run the agent yourself. Eventually it dawned on me why this approach was more ingenious than I realised:

Running my app in a production (or production-like) environment was already a solved problem, because everything was already in some form of "everything as code". Having a test environment where the only difference was adding the Buildkite agent was a trivial addition.

It means that dev/test/prod parity is simple to achieve and maintain. It's also proven to be much easier to support than trying to deal with the problems that come with trying to force an app to fit into the nuances and constraints that are imposed by the containers/runtime of a CI service. When you completely control all of the environment the tests are running in you define those constraints too. It's been a great balance between a managed service and the flexibility of running it yourself.

And while none of my needs have hit the scale of Shopify (I saw one of their engineers speak about it at a conference once, I can't find the video now though 😞) it's good to know I can scale out my worker nodes to hundreds of thousands of workers to reduce the time it takes for my tests to run.

See more
Recommends
on
jFrogjFrog

I would recommend you to consider the JFrog Platform that includes JFrog Pipelines - it will allow you to manage the full artifact life cycle for your sbt, docker and other technologies, and automate all of your CI and CD using cloud native declarative yaml pipelines. Will integrate smoothly with all your other toolset.

See more
Estu Fardani
Recommends
on
GitLab CIGitLab CI

more configurable to setup ci/cd: * It can provide caching when build sbt, just add this section to yml file * Easy to use, many documentation

Weakness: * Need use gitlab as repository to bring more powerful configuration

See more
Decisions about GitLab CI and Jenkins X

Buddy is one of the most easy-to-use tools for CI I ever met. When I needed to set up the pipeline I was really impressed with how easy it is to create it with Buddy with only a few moments. It's literally like: 1. Add repo 2. Click - Click - Click 3. You're done and your app is on prod :D The top feature that I've found is a simple integration with different notification channels - not only Slack (which is the one by default), but Telegram and Discord. The support is also neat - guys respond pretty quickly on even a small issue.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of GitLab CI
Pros of Jenkins X
  • 22
    Robust CI with awesome Docker support
  • 13
    Simple configuration
  • 9
    All in one solution
  • 7
    Source Control and CI in one place
  • 5
    Integrated with VCS on commit
  • 5
    Free and open source
  • 5
    Easy to configure own build server i.e. GitLab-Runner
  • 2
    Hosted internally
  • 1
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Built-in support of Review Apps
  • 1
    Pipeline could be started manually
  • 1
    Enable or disable pipeline by using env variables
  • 1
    Gitlab templates could be shared across logical group
  • 1
    Easy to setup the dedicated runner to particular job
  • 1
    Built-in support of Kubernetes
  • 7
    Kubernetes integration
  • 5
    Scripted Pipelines
  • 4
    GitOps

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of GitLab CI
Cons of Jenkins X
  • 2
    Works best with GitLab repositories
  • 1
    Complexity

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is GitLab CI?

GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.

What is Jenkins X?

Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jobs that mention GitLab CI and Jenkins X as a desired skillset
What companies use GitLab CI?
What companies use Jenkins X?
See which teams inside your own company are using GitLab CI or Jenkins X.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with GitLab CI?
What tools integrate with Jenkins X?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to GitLab CI and Jenkins X?
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
Bamboo
Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.
Travis CI
Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.
TeamCity
TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.
CircleCI
Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
See all alternatives