Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GitLab

60.5K
51.8K
+ 1
2.5K
GoCD

205
326
+ 1
206
Add tool

GitLab vs Go.CD: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between GitLab and Go.CD. GitLab and Go.CD are both popular DevOps tools that help streamline the software development and deployment process. While they share some similarities, there are also significant differences between the two platforms. Let's delve into the key distinctions.

  1. Deployment Pipeline Configuration: GitLab primarily focuses on providing a complete DevOps platform that includes version control, issue tracking, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. While GitLab does have a built-in CI/CD pipeline feature, it lacks the extensive customization options offered by Go.CD. Go.CD is specifically designed to simplify complex deployment pipelines by providing an intuitive and configurable interface. It allows users to define dependencies, orchestrations, fan-ins, and fan-outs, making it a powerful tool for managing intricate pipelines.

  2. Configuration Management: GitLab and Go.CD differ in their approach to configuration management. GitLab employs a declarative configuration approach, where users specify the desired state in a configuration file, and GitLab handles the execution. On the other hand, Go.CD adopts an imperative configuration approach, where users define the exact steps required to achieve the desired state. This allows for more granular control and allows teams to build more complex and flexible pipelines.

  3. Plugins and Extensions: Go.CD offers a vast library of plugins and extensions that enhance its functionality and make it easier to integrate with other tools in the DevOps ecosystem. These plugins provide support for various version control systems, notification mechanisms, analytics tools, and more. GitLab, on the other hand, offers a more integrated approach, where many functionalities are natively built into the platform. While GitLab does provide some plugins and integrations, it may require additional customization to achieve the same level of extensibility as Go.CD.

  4. User Interface: The user interface of GitLab and Go.CD differs significantly. GitLab provides a comprehensive web-based interface that encompasses all aspects of the DevOps lifecycle, including code management, issue tracking, and CI/CD pipelines. On the other hand, Go.CD focuses primarily on the pipeline orchestration and provides a simple, intuitive interface for pipeline configuration and visualization. This streamlined interface makes it easier for users to understand and manage their pipelines.

  5. Community and Support: GitLab has a large and active community, which contributes to its continuous improvement and provides a wealth of resources for users. The community-driven model allows for rapid development and innovation. Go.CD, while also having a dedicated community, is more commercially driven, with support and additional features available through commercial subscriptions. The choice between the two platforms depends on the level of community support desired and the need for commercial support and features.

  6. Pricing Model: GitLab offers a range of pricing options, including a free tier for small teams and a paid tier for enterprise customers. It follows a subscription-based pricing model that includes technical support and access to additional features. Go.CD, on the other hand, offers a free and open-source version that is suitable for many organizations. However, commercial support and additional enterprise features are available through a commercial subscription.

In summary, GitLab provides a complete DevOps platform with built-in CI/CD pipeline features, while Go.CD specializes in pipeline orchestration and configurability. GitLab adopts a declarative configuration approach, while Go.CD follows an imperative approach. Go.CD offers a broader range of plugins and extensions, while GitLab focuses on integration within its own platform. The user interface and community support differ between the two platforms, and the pricing models also vary. Overall, the choice between GitLab and Go.CD depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the organization.

Advice on GitLab and GoCD
Mohammad Hossein Amri
Chief Technology Officer at Planally · | 3 upvotes · 494.8K views
Needs advice
on
GoCDGoCD
and
JenkinsJenkins

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

See more
Replies (1)
Ankit Malik
Software Developer at CloudCover · | 1 upvotes · 477.5K views
Recommends
on
Google Cloud BuildGoogle Cloud Build

Google cloud build can help you. It is hosted on cloud and also provide reasonable free quota.

See more
Decisions about GitLab and GoCD
Elmar Wouters
CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media · | 7 upvotes · 491.5K views

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

See more
Kamaleshwar BN
Senior Software Engineer at Pulley · | 8 upvotes · 659.8K views

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

See more

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

See more
Nazar Atamaniuk
Shared insights
on
DeployPlaceDeployPlaceGitHubGitHubGitLabGitLab

At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of GitLab
Pros of GoCD
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 430
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
  • 137
    Includes many features, including ci
  • 113
    Nice UI
  • 84
    Good integration with gitlabci
  • 57
    Simple setup
  • 34
    Free private repository
  • 34
    Has an official mobile app
  • 31
    Continuous Integration
  • 22
    Open source, great ui (like github)
  • 18
    Slack Integration
  • 14
    Full CI flow
  • 11
    Free and unlimited private git repos
  • 10
    User, group, and project access management is simple
  • 9
    All in one (Git, CI, Agile..)
  • 8
    Built-in CI
  • 8
    Intuitive UI
  • 6
    Both public and private Repositories
  • 6
    Full DevOps suite with Git
  • 5
    Build/pipeline definition alongside code
  • 5
    CI
  • 5
    So easy to use
  • 5
    Integrated Docker Registry
  • 5
    It's powerful source code management tool
  • 4
    Issue system
  • 4
    Dockerized
  • 4
    Unlimited free repos & collaborators
  • 4
    Security and Stable
  • 4
    On-premises
  • 4
    It's fully integrated
  • 4
    Mattermost Chat client
  • 4
    Excellent
  • 3
    Great for team collaboration
  • 3
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 3
    Low maintenance cost due omnibus-deployment
  • 3
    I like the its runners and executors feature
  • 3
    Free private repos
  • 3
    Because is the best remote host for git repositories
  • 3
    Not Microsoft Owned
  • 3
    Opensource
  • 2
    Groups of groups
  • 2
    Powerful software planning and maintaining tools
  • 2
    Review Apps feature
  • 2
    Kubernetes integration with GitLab CI
  • 2
    It includes everything I need, all packaged with docker
  • 2
    Multilingual interface
  • 2
    HipChat intergration
  • 2
    Powerful Continuous Integration System
  • 2
    One-click install through DigitalOcean
  • 2
    The dashboard with deployed environments
  • 2
    Native CI
  • 2
    Many private repo
  • 2
    Kubernetes Integration
  • 2
    Published IP list for whitelisting (gl-infra#434)
  • 2
    Wounderful
  • 2
    Beautiful
  • 1
    Supports Radius/Ldap & Browser Code Edits
  • 31
    Open source
  • 27
    Pipeline dependencies
  • 25
    Pipeline structures
  • 22
    Can run jobs in parallel
  • 20
    Very flexible
  • 15
    Plugin architecture
  • 13
    Environments can keep config secure
  • 12
    Great UI
  • 10
    Good user roles and permissions
  • 9
    Supports many material dependencies
  • 7
    Fan-in, Fan-out
  • 6
    Designed for cd not just ci
  • 4
    Empowers product people to make delivery decisions
  • 2
    Flexible & easy deployment
  • 2
    Pass around artifacts
  • 1
    Build once

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of GitLab
Cons of GoCD
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 8
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
  • 2
    Lack of plugins
  • 2
    Horrible ui
  • 1
    No support

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is GitLab?

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

What is GoCD?

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use GitLab?
What companies use GoCD?
See which teams inside your own company are using GitLab or GoCD.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with GitLab?
What tools integrate with GoCD?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to GitLab and GoCD?
GitHub
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
Bitbucket
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
Gogs
The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.
Git
Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
See all alternatives