Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

OneDev

Stacks8

Followers30

Votes3

GitHub Stars14.4K

Forks920

GitLab vs OneDev: What are the differences?

GitLab and OneDev are both powerful and popular git repository management systems that provide a wide range of features. While both tools offer similar functionalities, there are several key differences that set them apart from each other. This article aims to highlight and explain these differences in detail.

1. Installation and Deployment: GitLab can be installed on a dedicated server or as a cloud-based solution, allowing organizations to have complete control over their repositories. On the other hand, OneDev offers a container-based deployment, making it easy to deploy the tool using Docker or Kubernetes, providing a more scalable and flexible solution.

2. Built-in CI/CD Support: GitLab provides extensive built-in Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) support, allowing users to set up automated testing and deployment pipelines effortlessly. OneDev, on the other hand, relies on external CI/CD tools integration, requiring additional setup and configuration.

3. User Interface and Customization: GitLab offers a feature-rich and intuitive user interface, allowing users to easily navigate and interact with their repositories. It also provides various customization options, enabling users to personalize their experience according to their preferences. OneDev, although functional, has a relatively simpler user interface and limited customization options compared to GitLab.

4. Pricing and Licensing: GitLab is available as both a free and open-source Community Edition (CE) and a paid Enterprise Edition (EE), offering additional features for enterprise users. OneDev, on the other hand, is entirely free and open-source, making it an attractive option for organizations with budget constraints or those seeking a cost-effective solution.

5. Issue and Project Management: GitLab provides robust issue tracking and project management capabilities, allowing users to effectively manage and track their tasks, milestones, and overall progress. OneDev, while it does offer similar functionalities, does not provide the same level of depth and integration with version control as GitLab.

6. Community and Support: GitLab has a large and active community of users, developers, and contributors that regularly provide support, contribute to the project, and share knowledge. This active community ensures frequent updates, bug fixes, and a wealth of documentation and resources. OneDev, being a relatively newer project, does not have as large of a community, resulting in potentially slower support and fewer resources available.

In Summary, GitLab offers more installation options, has built-in CI/CD support, provides a feature-rich and customizable user interface, has a flexible pricing model, offers robust issue and project management capabilities, and benefits from a large and active community. OneDev, on the other hand, provides container-based deployment, requires external CI/CD tool integration, has a simpler user interface, is entirely free and open-source, offers limited project management capabilities, and has a smaller community.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

Glide

Code Collaboration

AI-assisted technical design docs

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

8

Advice on GitLab, OneDev

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	OneDev
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	It is a super easy all-in-one DevOps platform. With Issue Tracking, Git Management, Pull Request, and Build Farm. Simple yet Powerful.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Docker First Kubernetes Native Build Farm; Create Build Spec in a Breeze; Flexible Build Workflow and Pipeline; Custom Issue States and Fields; Auto-Refreshing Issue Boards; Symbol Search and Navigation
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars 14.4K
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks 920
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 8
Followers 54.5K	Followers 30
Votes 2.5K	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	Pros 1 Self-hosted 1 Integrated CI/CD 1 Free
Integrations
No integrations available	C++ Java Less JavaScript Golang PHP Kubernetes C# Microsoft Edge

What are some alternatives to GitLab, OneDev?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.