GitLab vs Tuleap

Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Tuleap

Stacks10

Followers20

Votes0

GitLab vs Tuleap: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitLab and Tuleap are both software development platforms that provide various tools for managing version control, issue tracking, collaboration, and continuous integration. While they have similar functionalities, there are key differences between the two.

1. Integration Capabilities: GitLab offers more extensive integration capabilities compared to Tuleap. It seamlessly integrates with a wide range of third-party tools and services, such as JIRA, Slack, and Jenkins. Tuleap, on the other hand, has a more limited set of integration options.

2. Licensing Model: GitLab uses an open-source model, allowing users to freely access and modify the platform's source code. Tuleap, however, follows a hybrid licensing model, with both open-source and proprietary components. This means Tuleap may have certain features or modules that are only available in the paid version.

3. Community Support: GitLab has a larger and more active community compared to Tuleap. This means that users of GitLab can benefit from a wider pool of resources, forums, and user-generated content. Tuleap, although it has a supportive community, does not have the same level of activity and content availability.

4. Built-in Agile Boards: GitLab has built-in Agile boards, allowing users to manage their projects using Kanban or Scrum methodologies. This provides a visual way to track progress and manage tasks within the GitLab platform. Tuleap, however, does not have native Agile boards and requires the use of external tools or plugins to implement similar functionalities.

5. DevOps Capabilities: GitLab is renowned for its robust DevOps capabilities, offering features like integrated CI/CD pipelines and container registry. It provides a complete end-to-end DevOps workflow within a single platform. Tuleap, while it does offer some CI capabilities, does not have the same level of integration and automation as GitLab.

6. User Interface and User Experience: GitLab is often praised for its intuitive and user-friendly interface. It has a modern and visually appealing design, making it easy for users to navigate and understand its features. Tuleap, although functional, has a slightly more complex and less visually appealing user interface, which may require more time for users to become familiar with.

In Summary, GitLab offers more extensive integration capabilities, follows an open-source licensing model, has a larger community support, provides built-in Agile boards, has robust DevOps capabilities, and offers a more user-friendly interface compared to Tuleap.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitLab, Tuleap

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	Tuleap
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	Using the most efficient industry-leading software development approaches such as DevOps and Agile methods, Tuleap helps teams to make high quality and easier to manage software. With Tuleap, deliver value faster and better.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Project management; Code versioning; Tracking; Code review; Test management
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 10
Followers 54.5K	Followers 20
Votes 2.5K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Jenkins Git Bugzilla Gerrit Code Review

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Tuleap?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Pivotal Tracker

It is a collaborative, lightweight agile project management tool, brought to you by the experts in agile software development.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Taiga.io

Taiga is a project management platform for startups and agile developers & designers who want a simple, beautiful tool that makes work truly enjoyable. Over 55,000 developers & designers and over 52,0000 projects in first 10 months.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Targetprocess

Targetprocess is an agile project management software that focuses on information visualization and freedom. It helps to track projects using Scrum, Kanban or other agile practices.

Kanban Tool

Kanban Tool is an intuitive solution used for visual project management and process work flow management with seamless time tracking and time reports. It allows to visualize workflow, manage tasks and projects with online Kanban boards and cards.

GitLab vs Tuleap

Overview