GitLab vs Upsource: What are the differences?
GitLab: Open source self-hosted Git management software. GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers; Upsource: Self-hosted Git, Mercurial, Subversion and Perforce repository browser and code review tool. Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.
GitLab and Upsource can be primarily classified as "Code Collaboration & Version Control" tools.
Some of the features offered by GitLab are:
- Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure
- Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests
- Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki
On the other hand, Upsource provides the following key features:
- Instantly access all your projects
- Keep track of code changes
- Use code insight in Java projects
"Self hosted" is the primary reason why developers consider GitLab over the competitors, whereas "Free for 10 users" was stated as the key factor in picking Upsource.
GitLab is an open source tool with 20.1K GitHub stars and 5.33K GitHub forks. Here's a link to GitLab's open source repository on GitHub.
Coderus, Webedia, and Ticketmaster are some of the popular companies that use GitLab, whereas Upsource is used by SAYMON, Kialo, and simpleshow GmbH. GitLab has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1219 company stacks & 1431 developers stacks; compared to Upsource, which is listed in 3 company stacks and 4 developer stacks.