Go.CD vs Gogs

Overview

Gogs

Stacks175

Followers306

Votes182

GoCD

Stacks205

Followers325

Votes207

GitHub Stars7.3K

Forks980

Go.CD vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of continuous integration and version control, Go.CD and Gogs are two popular tools that cater to different aspects of the software development lifecycle.

Deployment and Orchestration: Go.CD focuses on deployment and orchestration, providing a powerful pipeline mechanism to automate and streamline the build, test, and release processes of software development projects. On the other hand, Gogs is primarily a self-hosted Git service that emphasizes version control and collaboration among team members.
Customization and Extensibility: Go.CD offers extensive customization options with plugins and integrations to tailor the CI/CD pipeline as per specific project requirements. In contrast, Gogs has a more streamlined approach with fewer customization options, focusing on simplicity and ease of use for version control.
Scalability and Performance: Go.CD is designed to handle complex pipelines and large-scale projects, making it ideal for enterprises and organizations with diverse software development needs. Gogs, on the other hand, is better suited for smaller teams and projects where scalability and performance are not the primary concerns.
User Interface and User Experience: Go.CD provides a sophisticated user interface with detailed analytics and monitoring capabilities to track the progress of pipelines and identify bottlenecks in the development process. Gogs, while intuitive and user-friendly, offers a more simplified interface focused on version control tasks and collaboration among team members.
Community Support and Documentation: Go.CD has a vibrant community of users and contributors, along with comprehensive documentation and support resources to help users maximize the potential of the tool. In comparison, Gogs has a smaller community base and less extensive documentation, which may limit the available resources for troubleshooting and assistance.
Cost and Licensing: Go.CD is an open-source tool with a free version available for use, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations looking to implement robust CI/CD pipelines without incurring additional expenses. Gogs, being open-source as well, offers similar cost benefits but may have limitations in terms of support and enterprise features compared to commercial alternatives.

In Summary, Go.CD and Gogs offer distinct advantages and functionalities in the realms of continuous integration, deployment, version control, and collaboration, catering to different needs and preferences of software development teams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Gogs, GoCD

Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planally

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Docker

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

545k views545k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gogs	GoCD
The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.	GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.
Activity timeline;SSH/HTTP(S) protocol support;SMTP/LDAP/reverse proxy authentication support;Register/delete/rename account;Create/migrate/mirror/delete/watch/rename/transfer public/private repository;Repository viewer/release/issue tracker/webhooks;Add/remove repository collaborators;Gravatar and cache support;Mail service(register, issue);Administration panel;Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite3;Social account login(GitHub, Google, QQ, Weibo)	Model complex workflows with dependency management and parallel execution; Easy to pass once-built binaries between stages; Visibility into your end-to-end workflow. Track a change from commit to deploy at a glance; Manual triggers allow deployment any version at anytime. And it's securable and auditable; Run tests written in most languages or frameworks, provides informative testing report; Compare both files and commit messages across any two arbitrary builds; Eliminate Bottlenecks by providing trivial parallel execution across pipelines, platforms, versions, branches, etc.; Easily reuse pipeline configurations via template system.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 7.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 980
Stacks 175	Stacks 205
Followers 306	Followers 325
Votes 182	Votes 207
Pros & Cons
Pros 36 Self-hosted github like service 31 Very low memory footprint 29 Easy to install / update 17 Lightweight (low minimal req.) runs on Raspberry pi 16 Single binary deploy no dependencies	Pros 32 Open source 27 Pipeline dependencies 25 Pipeline structures 22 Can run jobs in parallel 20 Very flexible Cons 2 Lack of plugins 2 Horrible ui 1 No support
Integrations
No integrations available	Docker Kubernetes Slack

What are some alternatives to Gogs, GoCD?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

Go.CD vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of continuous integration and version control, Go.CD and Gogs are two popular tools that cater to different aspects of the software development lifecycle.

Deployment and Orchestration: Go.CD focuses on deployment and orchestration, providing a powerful pipeline mechanism to automate and streamline the build, test, and release processes of software development projects. On the other hand, Gogs is primarily a self-hosted Git service that emphasizes version control and collaboration among team members.
Customization and Extensibility: Go.CD offers extensive customization options with plugins and integrations to tailor the CI/CD pipeline as per specific project requirements. In contrast, Gogs has a more streamlined approach with fewer customization options, focusing on simplicity and ease of use for version control.
Scalability and Performance: Go.CD is designed to handle complex pipelines and large-scale projects, making it ideal for enterprises and organizations with diverse software development needs. Gogs, on the other hand, is better suited for smaller teams and projects where scalability and performance are not the primary concerns.
User Interface and User Experience: Go.CD provides a sophisticated user interface with detailed analytics and monitoring capabilities to track the progress of pipelines and identify bottlenecks in the development process. Gogs, while intuitive and user-friendly, offers a more simplified interface focused on version control tasks and collaboration among team members.
Community Support and Documentation: Go.CD has a vibrant community of users and contributors, along with comprehensive documentation and support resources to help users maximize the potential of the tool. In comparison, Gogs has a smaller community base and less extensive documentation, which may limit the available resources for troubleshooting and assistance.
Cost and Licensing: Go.CD is an open-source tool with a free version available for use, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations looking to implement robust CI/CD pipelines without incurring additional expenses. Gogs, being open-source as well, offers similar cost benefits but may have limitations in terms of support and enterprise features compared to commercial alternatives.

Go.CD vs Gogs

Overview